• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

南非儿童和青少年暴力预防加速器:使用两个合并队列的路径分析。

Violence prevention accelerators for children and adolescents in South Africa: A path analysis using two pooled cohorts.

机构信息

Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2020 Nov 9;17(11):e1003383. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003383. eCollection 2020 Nov.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003383
PMID:33166288
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7652294/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The INSPIRE framework was developed by 10 global agencies as the first global package for preventing and responding to violence against children. The framework includes seven complementary strategies. Delivering all seven strategies is a challenge in resource-limited contexts. Consequently, governments are requesting additional evidence to inform which 'accelerator' provisions can simultaneously reduce multiple types of violence against children.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We pooled data from two prospective South African adolescent cohorts including Young Carers (2010-2012) and Mzantsi Wakho (2014-2017). The combined sample size was 5,034 adolescents. Each cohort measured six self-reported violence outcomes (sexual abuse, transactional sexual exploitation, physical abuse, emotional abuse, community violence victimisation, and youth lawbreaking) and seven self-reported INSPIRE-aligned protective factors (positive parenting, parental monitoring and supervision, food security at home, basic economic security at home, free schooling, free school meals, and abuse response services). Associations between hypothesised protective factors and violence outcomes were estimated jointly in a sex-stratified multivariate path model, controlling for baseline outcomes and socio-demographics and correcting for multiple-hypothesis testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. We calculated adjusted probability estimates conditional on the presence of no, one, or all protective factors significantly associated with reduced odds of at least three forms of violence in the path model. Adjusted risk differences (ARDs) and adjusted risk ratios (ARRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were also calculated. The sample mean age was 13.54 years, and 56.62% were female. There was 4% loss to follow-up. Positive parenting, parental monitoring and supervision, and food security at home were each associated with lower odds of three or more violence outcomes (p < 0.05). For girls, the adjusted probability of violence outcomes was estimated to be lower if all three of these factors were present, as compared to none of them: sexual abuse, 5.38% and 1.64% (ARD: -3.74% points, 95% CI -5.31 to -2.16, p < 0.001); transactional sexual exploitation, 10.07% and 4.84% (ARD: -5.23% points, 95% CI -7.26 to -3.20, p < 0.001); physical abuse, 38.58% and 23.85% (ARD: -14.72% points, 95% CI -19.11 to -10.33, p < 0.001); emotional abuse, 25.39% and 12.98% (ARD: -12.41% points, 95% CI -16.00 to -8.83, p < 0.001); community violence victimisation, 36.25% and 28.37% (ARD: -7.87% points, 95% CI -11.98 to -3.76, p < 0.001); and youth lawbreaking, 18.90% and 11.61% (ARD: -7.30% points, 95% CI -10.50 to -4.09, p < 0.001). For boys, the adjusted probability of violence outcomes was also estimated to be lower if all three factors were present, as compared to none of them: sexual abuse, 2.39% to 1.80% (ARD: -0.59% points, 95% CI -2.24 to 1.05, p = 0.482); transactional sexual exploitation, 6.97% to 4.55% (ARD: -2.42% points, 95% CI -4.77 to -0.08, p = 0.043); physical abuse from 37.19% to 25.44% (ARD: -11.74% points, 95% CI -16.91 to -6.58, p < 0.001); emotional abuse from 23.72% to 10.72% (ARD: -13.00% points, 95% CI -17.04 to -8.95, p < 0.001); community violence victimisation from 41.28% to 35.41% (ARD: -5.87% points, 95% CI -10.98 to -0.75, p = 0.025); and youth lawbreaking from 22.44% to 14.98% (ARD -7.46% points, 95% CI -11.57 to -3.35, p < 0.001). Key limitations were risk of residual confounding and not having information on protective factors related to all seven INSPIRE strategies.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort study, we found that positive and supervisory caregiving and food security at home are associated with reduced risk of multiple forms of violence against children. The presence of all three of these factors may be linked to greater risk reduction as compared to the presence of one or none of these factors. Policies promoting action on positive and supervisory caregiving and food security at home are likely to support further efficiencies in the delivery of INSPIRE.

摘要

背景

INSPIRE 框架由 10 个全球机构制定,是预防和应对针对儿童暴力的首个全球方案。该框架包括七种相辅相成的战略。在资源有限的情况下,实施所有七种战略具有挑战性。因此,各国政府要求提供更多证据,以确定哪些“加速”条款能够同时减少多种类型的针对儿童的暴力。

方法和发现

我们汇总了两项南非青少年队列研究的数据,包括 Young Carers(2010-2012 年)和 Mzantsi Wakho(2014-2017 年)。合并样本量为 5034 名青少年。每个队列都测量了六种自我报告的暴力结果(性虐待、交易性性剥削、身体虐待、情感虐待、社区暴力受害和青少年违法犯罪)和七种自我报告的与 INSPIRE 一致的保护因素(积极的育儿方式、父母监督和监管、家庭食品安全、家庭基本经济保障、免费上学、免费学校膳食和虐待反应服务)。在性别分层多变量路径模型中,我们联合估计了假设的保护因素与暴力结果之间的关联,控制了基线结果和社会人口统计学因素,并使用 Benjamini-Hochberg 程序对多假设检验进行了校正。我们根据路径模型中与降低至少三种形式暴力的可能性显著相关的保护因素的存在情况,计算了调整后的概率估计值。我们还计算了调整后的风险差异(ARD)和调整后的风险比(ARR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)。样本的平均年龄为 13.54 岁,其中 56.62%为女性。研究存在 4%的失访率。积极的育儿方式、父母监督和监管以及家庭食品安全都与较低的多种暴力结果风险相关(p<0.05)。对于女孩,如果这三个因素都存在,与没有或只有一个因素存在相比,发生暴力结果的调整后概率估计值较低:性虐待,5.38%和 1.64%(ARD:-3.74%点,95%CI-5.31 至-2.16,p<0.001);交易性性剥削,10.07%和 4.84%(ARD:-5.23%点,95%CI-7.26 至-3.20,p<0.001);身体虐待,38.58%和 23.85%(ARD:-14.72%点,95%CI-19.11 至-10.33,p<0.001);情感虐待,25.39%和 12.98%(ARD:-12.41%点,95%CI-16.00 至-8.83,p<0.001);社区暴力受害,36.25%和 28.37%(ARD:-7.87%点,95%CI-11.98 至-3.76,p<0.001);青少年违法犯罪,18.90%和 11.61%(ARD:-7.30%点,95%CI-10.50 至-4.09,p<0.001)。对于男孩,如果这三个因素都存在,与没有或只有一个因素存在相比,发生暴力结果的调整后概率估计值也较低:性虐待,2.39%至 1.80%(ARD:-0.59%点,95%CI-2.24 至 1.05,p=0.482);交易性性剥削,6.97%至 4.55%(ARD:-2.42%点,95%CI-4.77 至-0.08,p=0.043);身体虐待从 37.19%降至 25.44%(ARD:-11.74%点,95%CI-16.91 至-6.58,p<0.001);情感虐待从 23.72%降至 10.72%(ARD:-13.00%点,95%CI-17.04 至-8.95,p<0.001);社区暴力受害从 41.28%降至 35.41%(ARD:-5.87%点,95%CI-10.98 至-0.75,p=0.025);青少年违法犯罪从 22.44%降至 14.98%(ARD-7.46%点,95%CI-11.57 至-3.35,p<0.001)。主要局限性在于存在残余混杂的风险,并且没有与 INSPIRE 的所有七种策略相关的保护因素信息。

结论

在这项队列研究中,我们发现积极的养育和监督以及家庭食品安全与降低多种针对儿童的暴力风险相关。与存在一种或不存在这些因素相比,同时存在这三种因素可能与更大的风险降低相关。促进积极的养育和监督以及家庭食品安全的政策可能会进一步提高 INSPIRE 的实施效率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98be/7652294/7247ca3e46e0/pmed.1003383.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98be/7652294/77ab80f466d0/pmed.1003383.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98be/7652294/7247ca3e46e0/pmed.1003383.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98be/7652294/77ab80f466d0/pmed.1003383.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98be/7652294/7247ca3e46e0/pmed.1003383.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Violence prevention accelerators for children and adolescents in South Africa: A path analysis using two pooled cohorts.南非儿童和青少年暴力预防加速器:使用两个合并队列的路径分析。
PLoS Med. 2020 Nov 9;17(11):e1003383. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003383. eCollection 2020 Nov.
2
Improving lives by accelerating progress towards the UN Sustainable Development Goals for adolescents living with HIV: a prospective cohort study.通过加速实现联合国可持续发展目标,改善艾滋病毒感染者青少年的生活:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2019 Apr;3(4):245-254. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30033-1.
3
Protective factors for adolescent sexual risk behaviours and experiences linked to HIV infection in South Africa: a three-wave longitudinal analysis of caregiving, education, food security, and social protection.保护因素对青少年性行为风险和艾滋病感染相关经验的影响:南非基于三波纵向分析的养育、教育、粮食安全和社会保护。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jul 29;23(1):1452. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16373-5.
4
Accelerators to reduce violence, HIV risk, and early pregnancy among adolescents and young people in Namibia: A cross-sectional analysis of the Violence Against Children & Youth Survey.纳米比亚减少青少年和青年暴力、艾滋病毒风险及早孕的促进因素:针对儿童及青少年暴力调查的横断面分析
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 May 20;5(5):e0004633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004633. eCollection 2025.
5
Multiple violence victimisation associated with sexual ill health and sexual risk behaviours in Swedish youth.瑞典青少年中与性健康不良及性风险行为相关的多重暴力受害情况。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016;21(1):49-56. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2015.1089227. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
6
Violence in the United States: Status, Challenges, and Opportunities.美国的暴力问题:现状、挑战与机遇
JAMA. 2015 Aug 4;314(5):478-88. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.8371.
7
Prevalence of consensual male-male sex and sexual violence, and associations with HIV in South Africa: a population-based cross-sectional study.南非基于人群的横断面研究:同意的男男性行为和性暴力的流行情况及其与艾滋病毒的关联。
PLoS Med. 2013;10(6):e1001472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001472. Epub 2013 Jun 18.
8
Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization--national intimate partner and sexual violence survey, United States, 2011.性暴力、跟踪和亲密伴侣暴力受害的流行率和特征——2011 年美国全国亲密伴侣和性暴力调查。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014 Sep 5;63(8):1-18.
9
The role of structural factors for preventing HIV risk practices among adolescents in South Africa: A three-wave analysis of caregiving, education, food security, and social protection.结构因素在预防南非青少年感染艾滋病毒风险行为中的作用:对照料、教育、粮食安全和社会保护的三阶段分析
Res Sq. 2023 Feb 7:rs.3.rs-2164051. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2164051/v1.
10
Household illness, poverty and physical and emotional child abuse victimisation: findings from South Africa's first prospective cohort study.家庭疾病、贫困以及身体和情感上的儿童虐待受害:来自南非首次前瞻性队列研究的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2015 May 1;15:444. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1792-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Preventing Sexual Violence and Strengthening Post-Victimization Support Among Adolescents and Young People in Kenya: An INSPIRE-Aligned Analysis of the 2019 Violence Against Children Survey (VACS).预防肯尼亚青少年和年轻人中的性暴力并加强受害后支持:对2019年暴力侵害儿童调查(VACS)的一项符合“启发”倡议的分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 May 30;22(6):863. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22060863.
2
Accelerators to reduce violence, HIV risk, and early pregnancy among adolescents and young people in Namibia: A cross-sectional analysis of the Violence Against Children & Youth Survey.纳米比亚减少青少年和青年暴力、艾滋病毒风险及早孕的促进因素:针对儿童及青少年暴力调查的横断面分析
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 May 20;5(5):e0004633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004633. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A Cash Plus Program Reduces Youth Exposure to Physical Violence in Zimbabwe.现金加项目减少了津巴布韦青少年遭受身体暴力的情况。
World Dev. 2020 Oct;134. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105037. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
2
Parenting, mental health and economic pathways to prevention of violence against children in South Africa.南非预防儿童暴力的养育、心理健康和经济途径。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Oct;262:113194. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113194. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
3
Combining parenting and economic strengthening programmes to reduce violence against children: a cluster randomised controlled trial with predominantly male caregivers in rural Tanzania.
Tackling the Triple Threat in Kenya: Factors Associated with Protection against HIV Risk, Gender-Based Violence, and Pregnancy among Adolescent Girls and Young Women.应对肯尼亚的三重威胁:与青春期女孩和年轻女性预防艾滋病毒风险、性别暴力及怀孕相关的因素
AIDS Behav. 2025 Jun;29(6):1738-1746. doi: 10.1007/s10461-025-04643-9. Epub 2025 Feb 13.
4
Reducing family and school-based violence at scale: a large-scale pre-post study of a parenting programme delivered to families with adolescent girls in Tanzania.大规模减少家庭和学校暴力:坦桑尼亚对少女家庭实施养育方案的大规模前后研究
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Nov 24;9(11):e015472. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015472.
5
Toward a Contextually Sensitive Understanding of Polyvictimization: A Latent Class Analysis of Violence, Risks, and Protections Among South African Adolescents From Highly Deprived Settings.朝向对多重受害的情境敏感理解:南非高度贫困处境青少年的暴力、风险和保护的潜在类别分析。
J Interpers Violence. 2024 Aug;39(15-16):3591-3618. doi: 10.1177/08862605241233273. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
6
Key normative, legal, and policy considerations for supporting pregnant and postpartum adolescents in high HIV-burden settings: a critical analysis.支持高艾滋病毒负担环境中怀孕和产后青少年的关键规范性、法律和政策考虑因素:批判性分析。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):2249696. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2249696.
7
Assessing the cost-effectiveness of economic strengthening and parenting support for preventing violence against adolescents in Mpumalanga Province, South Africa: An economic modelling study using non-randomised data.评估南非姆普马兰加省加强经济支持和育儿支持预防青少年暴力行为的成本效益:一项使用非随机数据的经济建模研究
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Aug 17;3(8):e0001666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001666. eCollection 2023.
8
Protocol for the OCAY study: a cohort study of orphanhood and caregiver loss in the COVID-19 era to explore the impact on children and adolescents.OCAY 研究方案:COVID-19 时代孤儿和照顾者丧失的队列研究,旨在探讨其对儿童和青少年的影响。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 1;13(6):e071023. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071023.
9
Understanding accelerators to improve SDG-related outcomes for adolescents-An investigation into the nature and quantum of additive effects of protective factors to guide policy making.理解加速器,以改善青少年与可持续发展目标相关的成果——对保护因素的性质和增量效果的调查,以指导决策。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 6;18(1):e0278020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278020. eCollection 2023.
10
Are Children Harmed by Being Locked up at Home? The Impact of Isolation during the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Phenomenon of Domestic Violence.儿童被关在家里会受到伤害吗?新冠疫情期间隔离对家庭暴力现象的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 27;19(21):13958. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113958.
将育儿和经济增强计划相结合以减少针对儿童的暴力行为:在坦桑尼亚农村以男性照顾者为主的群组随机对照试验。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Jul;5(7). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002349.
4
Consistent Provisions Mitigate Exposure to Sexual Risk and HIV Among Young Adolescents in South Africa.一致的规定可降低南非青少年面临的性风险和感染艾滋病毒的几率。
AIDS Behav. 2020 Mar;24(3):903-913. doi: 10.1007/s10461-019-02735-x.
5
Parenting for Lifelong Health for Young Children: a randomized controlled trial of a parenting program in South Africa to prevent harsh parenting and child conduct problems.养育幼儿,促进终生健康:南非一项预防严厉养育和儿童行为问题的养育项目的随机对照试验
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;61(4):503-512. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13129. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
6
Impact of Cash Transfer programs on Food Security and Nutrition in sub-Saharan Africa: A Cross-Country Analysis.现金转移计划对撒哈拉以南非洲地区粮食安全和营养状况的影响:一项跨国分析。
Glob Food Sec. 2016 Dec;11:72-83. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2016.07.009. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
7
Improving lives by accelerating progress towards the UN Sustainable Development Goals for adolescents living with HIV: a prospective cohort study.通过加速实现联合国可持续发展目标,改善艾滋病毒感染者青少年的生活:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2019 Apr;3(4):245-254. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30033-1.
8
Screening and supporting through schools: educational experiences and needs of adolescents living with HIV in a South African cohort.通过学校进行筛查和支持:南非队列中感染艾滋病毒的青少年的教育经验和需求。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Mar 6;19(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6580-0.
9
Parenting for Lifelong Health: a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial of a non-commercialised parenting programme for adolescents and their families in South Africa.促进终身健康的育儿:一项针对南非青少年及其家庭的非商业化育儿项目的实用整群随机对照试验。
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Jan 31;3(1):e000539. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000539. eCollection 2018.
10
Young women's perceptions of transactional sex and sexual agency: a qualitative study in the context of rural South Africa.年轻女性对交易性行为和性自主的认知:南非农村背景下的一项定性研究
BMC Public Health. 2017 Aug 22;17(1):666. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4636-6.