University College London, Institute for Global Health, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Global Health, Stellenbosch University, Institute for Life Course Health Research, Cape Town, South Africa.
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 6;18(1):e0278020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278020. eCollection 2023.
Recent evidence has shown support for the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) accelerator concept, which highlights the need to identify interventions or programmatic areas that can affect multiple sustainable development goals (SDGs) at once to boost their achievement. These data have also clearly shown enhanced effects when interventions are used in combination, above and beyond the effect of single interventions. However, detailed knowledge is now required on optimum combinations and relative gain in order to derive policy guidance. Which accelerators work for which outcomes, what combinations are optimum, and how many combinations are needed to maximise effect? The current study utilised pooled data from the Young Carers (n = 1402) and Child Community Care (n = 446) studies. Data were collected at baseline (n = 1848) and at a 1 to 1.5- year follow-up (n = 1740) from children and young adolescents aged 9-13 years, living in South Africa. Measures in common between the two databases were used to generate five accelerators (caregiver praise, caregiver monitoring, food security, living in a safe community, and access to community-based organizations) and to investigate their additive effects on 14 SDG-related outcomes. Predicted probabilities and predicted probability differences were calculated for each SDG outcome under the presence of none to five accelerators to determine optimal combinations. Results show that various accelerator combinations are effective, though different combinations are needed for different outcomes. Some accelerators ramified across multiple outcomes. Overall, the presence of up to three accelerators was associated with marked improvements over multiple outcomes. The benefit of targeting access to additional accelerators, with additional costs, needs to be weighed against the relative gains to be achieved with high quality but focused interventions. In conclusion, the current data show the detailed impact of various protective factors and provides implementation guidance for policy makers in targeting and distributing interventions to maximise effect and expenditure. Future work should investigate multiplicative effects and synergistic interactions between accelerators.
最近的证据支持了联合国开发计划署(UNDP)的加速概念,该概念强调需要确定能够同时影响多个可持续发展目标(SDGs)的干预措施或方案领域,以促进其实现。这些数据还清楚地表明,当干预措施联合使用时,其效果会增强,超过单一干预措施的效果。然而,现在需要详细了解最佳组合和相对收益,以便为政策提供指导。哪些加速因素适用于哪些结果,哪些组合是最佳的,以及需要多少组合才能最大限度地发挥效果?本研究利用了来自南非的年轻照顾者(n=1402)和儿童社区关怀(n=446)研究的汇总数据。数据于基线(n=1848)和 1 至 1.5 年的随访(n=1740)期间收集,涉及年龄在 9-13 岁的儿童和青少年。两个数据库之间共同的措施用于生成五个加速因素(照顾者的赞扬、照顾者的监督、食品安全、生活在安全的社区和获得社区组织),并研究它们对 14 个与可持续发展目标相关的结果的累加效应。在不存在到存在五个加速因素的情况下,为每个可持续发展目标结果计算了预测概率和预测概率差异,以确定最佳组合。结果表明,各种加速因素组合是有效的,尽管不同的组合适用于不同的结果。一些加速因素在多个结果中扩展。总体而言,存在多达三个加速因素与多个结果的显著改善有关。需要权衡增加获得额外加速因素的机会,以及通过高质量但集中的干预措施实现的相对收益,以权衡额外成本带来的好处。总之,目前的数据显示了各种保护因素的详细影响,并为决策者提供了实施指导,以针对和分配干预措施,以最大限度地提高效果和支出。未来的工作应该研究加速因素之间的乘法效应和协同相互作用。