Suppr超能文献

取栓简史——不同血管内卒中治疗技术的操作和疗效分析。

A short history of thrombectomy - Procedure and success analysis of different endovascular stroke treatment techniques.

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.

Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Interv Neuroradiol. 2021 Apr;27(2):249-256. doi: 10.1177/1591019920961883. Epub 2020 Nov 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The historical development of interventional stroke treatment shows a wide variation of different techniques and materials used. Thus, the question of the present work is whether the technical and procedural differences of thrombectomy techniques lead to different technical and clinical results.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Analysis of a mixed retrospective/prospective database of all endovascular treated patients with an occlusion of the Carotid-T or M1 segment of the MCA at a single comprehensive stroke center since 2008. Patients were classified regarding the technical approach used. Six hundred sixty-eight patients were available for the final analysis. Reperfusion rates ranged between 56% and 100% depending on the technical approach. The use of balloon guide catheters and most recently the establishment of combination techniques using balloon guide catheters, aspiration catheters and stent retrievers have shown a further significant increase in the rates of successful recanalization, full recanalization and first-pass recanalization. Additionally, the technical development of interventional techniques has led to a subsequent drop in complications, embolization into previously unaffected territories in particular.

CONCLUSION

Technical success of MT has improved substantially over the past decade owing to improved materials and procedural innovations. Combination techniques including flow modulation have emerged to be the most effective approach and should be considered as a standard of care. Level 3, retrospective study.

摘要

背景

介入性卒中治疗的历史发展表明,使用的技术和材料存在广泛的差异。因此,目前工作的问题是,血栓切除术技术的技术和程序差异是否会导致不同的技术和临床结果。

方法和结果

分析了自 2008 年以来,在一家综合性卒中中心对所有颈内动脉或 MCA M1 段闭塞的血管内治疗患者的混合回顾性/前瞻性数据库。根据使用的技术方法对患者进行分类。668 例患者最终纳入分析。再灌注率取决于技术方法,范围在 56%至 100%之间。使用球囊引导导管,最近还建立了使用球囊引导导管、抽吸导管和支架取栓器的联合技术,进一步显著提高了成功再通、完全再通和首次通过再通的比率。此外,介入技术的技术发展导致并发症随后下降,特别是以前未受影响的区域的栓塞。

结论

由于改进了材料和手术创新,过去十年中 MT 的技术成功率有了显著提高。包括血流调节在内的联合技术已经成为最有效的方法,应被视为一种护理标准。3 级回顾性研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7b9/8050518/05fac7b772b5/10.1177_1591019920961883-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验