Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜手术治疗高容量中心 T1b 和 T2 偶然胆囊癌的肿瘤扩大切除术:中国单中心经验。

Laparoscopic surgery for oncologic extended resection of T1b and T2 incidental gallbladder carcinoma at a high-volume center: a single-center experience in China.

机构信息

Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2021 Dec;35(12):6505-6512. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08146-7. Epub 2020 Nov 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment is still the most effective treatment for gallbladder cancer. For the patients with stage T1b and above, the current guidelines recommend the extended radical operation, and oncologic extended resection can benefit the survival of the patients. The laparoscopic approach is still in the early phase, and its safety and oncological outcomes are not well known.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the technical feasibility and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for oncologic extended resection of early-stage incidental gallbladder carcinoma.

RESULTS

This study included 18 male and 32 female patients. Twenty patients underwent laparoscopic oncologic extended resection and 30 patients underwent open oncologic extended resection. All of the patients had R0 resection. A laparoscopic approach was associated with less intraoperative blood loss (242 ± 108.5 vs 401 ± 130.3; p < 0.01) and shorter duration of postoperative hospital stay (6.2 ± 2.4 vs 8.6 ± 2.3; p < 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference between two groups for lymph nodes yield (5.4 ± 3.5 vs 5.8 ± 2.1; p > 0.05), incidence of lymphatic metastasis (15% vs 16.67%; p > 0.05), residual disease (20% vs 23.3%; p > 0.05), and postoperative morbidity (15% vs 20%; p > 0.05). During follow-up time of median 20.95 (12-29.5) months, no significant difference was found between the two groups for early tumor recurrence (10% vs 13.33%; p > 0.05) and disease-free survival (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic surgery may offer similar intraoperative, perioperative, and short-term oncological outcomes as an open oncologic extended resection for incidental gallbladder carcinoma.

摘要

背景

手术治疗仍然是治疗胆囊癌最有效的方法。对于 T1b 期及以上的患者,目前的指南建议进行扩大根治性手术,肿瘤扩大切除术有益于患者的生存。腹腔镜方法仍处于早期阶段,其安全性和肿瘤学结果尚不清楚。

目的

评估腹腔镜手术治疗偶发性胆囊癌的肿瘤扩大切除术的技术可行性和肿瘤学结果。

结果

本研究共纳入 18 例男性和 32 例女性患者。20 例患者接受腹腔镜肿瘤扩大切除术,30 例患者接受开腹肿瘤扩大切除术。所有患者均行 R0 切除。与开腹手术相比,腹腔镜方法术中出血量更少(242±108.5 比 401±130.3;p<0.01),术后住院时间更短(6.2±2.4 比 8.6±2.3;p<0.01)。两组间淋巴结检出数(5.4±3.5 比 5.8±2.1;p>0.05)、淋巴结转移发生率(15%比 16.67%;p>0.05)、残癌率(20%比 23.3%;p>0.05)和术后发病率(15%比 20%;p>0.05)无统计学差异。在中位随访时间 20.95(12-29.5)个月期间,两组患者早期肿瘤复发率(10%比 13.33%;p>0.05)和无病生存率(p>0.05)无显著差异。

结论

腹腔镜手术可为偶发性胆囊癌提供与开放性肿瘤扩大切除术相似的术中、围手术期和短期肿瘤学结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验