• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估 T1b/T2 期胆囊癌对生存的影响因素及手术方式选择。

Estimating the influencing factors for T1b/T2 gallbladder cancer on survival and surgical approaches selection.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.

Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2023 Aug;12(16):16744-16755. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6297. Epub 2023 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1002/cam4.6297
PMID:37366278
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10501227/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The influencing factors, especially time to treatment (TTT), for T1b/T2 gallbladder cancer (GBC) patients remain unknown. We aimed to identify the influencing factors on survival and surgical approaches selection for T1b/T2 GBC.

METHODS

We retrospectively screened GBC patients between January 2011 and August 2018 from our hospital. Clinical variables, including patient characteristics, TTT, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), surgery-related outcomes, and surgical approaches were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 114 T1b/T2 GBC patients who underwent radical resection were included. Based on the median TTT of 7.5 days, the study cohort was divided into short TTT group (TTT ≤7 days, n = 57) and long TTT group (TTT >7 days, n = 57). Referrals were identified as the primary factor prolonging TTT (p < 0.001). There was no significance in OS (p = 0.790), DFS (p = 0.580), and surgery-related outcomes (all p > 0.05) between both groups. Decreased referrals (p = 0.005), fewer positive lymph nodes (LNs; p = 0.004), and well tumor differentiation (p = 0.004) were all associated with better OS, while fewer positive LNs (p = 0.049) were associated with better DFS. Subgroup analyses revealed no significant difference in survival between patients undergoing laparoscopic or open approach in different TTT groups (all p > 0.05). And secondary subgroup analyses found no significance in survival and surgery-related outcomes between different TTT groups of incidental GBC patients (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Positive LNs and tumor differentiation were prognostic factors for T1b/T2 GBC survival. Referrals associating with poor OS would delay TTT, while the prolonged TTT would not impact survival, surgery-related outcomes, and surgical approaches decisions in T1b/T2 GBC patients.

摘要

背景

T1b/T2 期胆囊癌(GBC)患者的影响因素,尤其是治疗时间(TTT),仍不清楚。我们旨在确定 T1b/T2 GBC 患者生存和手术方式选择的影响因素。

方法

我们回顾性筛选了 2011 年 1 月至 2018 年 8 月期间我院收治的 GBC 患者。收集了临床变量,包括患者特征、TTT、总生存期(OS)、无病生存期(DFS)、手术相关结局和手术方式。

结果

共纳入 114 例接受根治性切除术的 T1b/T2 GBC 患者。根据 TTT 的中位数 7.5 天,将研究队列分为短 TTT 组(TTT≤7 天,n=57)和长 TTT 组(TTT>7 天,n=57)。转诊被确定为延长 TTT 的主要因素(p<0.001)。两组在 OS(p=0.790)、DFS(p=0.580)和手术相关结局(均 p>0.05)方面均无差异。减少转诊(p=0.005)、阳性淋巴结(LNs)较少(p=0.004)和肿瘤分化良好(p=0.004)均与 OS 改善相关,而阳性 LNs 较少(p=0.049)与 DFS 改善相关。亚组分析显示,在不同 TTT 组中,腹腔镜或开放手术的患者在生存方面无显著差异(均 p>0.05)。进一步的亚组分析发现,在意外 GBC 患者的不同 TTT 组中,生存和手术相关结局方面也无显著差异(均 p>0.05)。

结论

阳性 LNs 和肿瘤分化是 T1b/T2 GBC 生存的预后因素。与较差 OS 相关的转诊会延迟 TTT,而 T1b/T2 GBC 患者的 TTT 延长不会影响生存、手术相关结局和手术方式决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3034/10501227/1c4ea1c3d281/CAM4-12-16744-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3034/10501227/4adad008934b/CAM4-12-16744-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3034/10501227/719df9d95e43/CAM4-12-16744-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3034/10501227/aa55c2513ed9/CAM4-12-16744-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3034/10501227/1c4ea1c3d281/CAM4-12-16744-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3034/10501227/4adad008934b/CAM4-12-16744-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3034/10501227/719df9d95e43/CAM4-12-16744-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3034/10501227/aa55c2513ed9/CAM4-12-16744-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3034/10501227/1c4ea1c3d281/CAM4-12-16744-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Estimating the influencing factors for T1b/T2 gallbladder cancer on survival and surgical approaches selection.评估 T1b/T2 期胆囊癌对生存的影响因素及手术方式选择。
Cancer Med. 2023 Aug;12(16):16744-16755. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6297. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
2
Comparison of Outcomes After Primary Laparoscopic Versus Open Approach for T1b/T2 Gallbladder Cancer.T1b/T2期胆囊癌初次腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗效果的比较
Front Oncol. 2021 Oct 28;11:758319. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.758319. eCollection 2021.
3
Simple cholecystectomy is an adequate treatment for grade I T1bN0M0 gallbladder carcinoma: Evidence from 528 patients.单纯胆囊切除术治疗Ⅰ期 T1bN0M0 胆囊癌是足够的:来自 528 例患者的证据。
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Aug 21;28(31):4431-4441. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i31.4431.
4
Long-term outcomes of surgical resection for T1b gallbladder cancer: an institutional evaluation.T1b 期胆囊癌行手术切除的长期疗效:一项机构评估。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jan 6;20(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6507-2.
5
Incidental gallbladder cancer during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: managing an unexpected finding.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中偶然发现的胆囊癌:处理意外发现。
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Aug 14;18(30):4019-27. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i30.4019.
6
Oncologic Outcomes of Extended Lymphadenectomy without Liver Resection for T1/T2 Gallbladder Cancer.T1/T2 期胆囊癌行扩大淋巴结清扫术而不进行肝脏切除术的肿瘤学结果。
Yonsei Med J. 2019 Dec;60(12):1138-1145. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2019.60.12.1138.
7
Node positivity in T1b gallbladder cancer: A high volume centre experience.T1b 期胆囊癌的淋巴结阳性:大样本量中心的经验。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022 Jul;48(7):1585-1589. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.03.013. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
8
Managing the incidentally detected gallbladder cancer: algorithms and controversies.偶然发现的胆囊癌的处理:算法和争议。
Int J Surg. 2014;12 Suppl 2:S108-S119. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.08.367. Epub 2014 Aug 23.
9
Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes for T2 Gallbladder Cancer According to the Type of Surgery Performed and the Optimal Timing for Sequential Extended Cholecystectomy.根据手术类型和序贯扩大胆囊切除术的最佳时机,T2 期胆囊癌的长期肿瘤学结果。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Aug;26(8):1705-1712. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05368-z. Epub 2022 May 31.
10
National Failure of Surgical Staging for T1b Gallbladder Cancer.T1b 期胆囊癌外科分期全国性失败。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Feb;26(2):604-610. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-7064-7. Epub 2018 Nov 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Individualized Prognostic Insights: CONUT-GBRS for Survival Prediction in Gallbladder Cancer.个性化预后见解:用于胆囊癌生存预测的CONUT-GBRS
Cancer Med. 2025 Sep;14(18):e71203. doi: 10.1002/cam4.71203.
2
New trends in diagnosis and management of gallbladder carcinoma.胆囊癌诊断与治疗的新趋势
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024 Jan 15;16(1):13-29. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i1.13.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-Term Outcomes and Exploratory Analyses of the Randomized Phase III BILCAP Study.随机 III 期 BILCAP 研究的长期结果和探索性分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jun 20;40(18):2048-2057. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02568. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
2
Long-term incidence and survival trends in cancer of the gallbladder and extrahepatic bile ducts in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden with etiological implications related to Thorotrast.丹麦、芬兰、挪威和瑞典的胆囊和肝外胆管癌的长期发病和生存趋势及其与 Thorotrast 相关的病因学意义。
Int J Cancer. 2022 Jul 15;151(2):200-208. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33980. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
3
Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection in Gallbladder Cancer.
腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗胆囊癌的对比研究。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2022 Aug;32(8):854-859. doi: 10.1089/lap.2021.0670. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
4
Comparison of Outcomes After Primary Laparoscopic Versus Open Approach for T1b/T2 Gallbladder Cancer.T1b/T2期胆囊癌初次腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗效果的比较
Front Oncol. 2021 Oct 28;11:758319. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.758319. eCollection 2021.
5
A randomised phase II study of oxaliplatin/5-FU (mFOLFOX) versus irinotecan/5-FU (mFOLFIRI) chemotherapy in locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer refractory to first-line gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy.一项奥沙利铂/5-FU(mFOLFOX)与伊立替康/5-FU(mFOLFIRI)化疗对比一线吉西他滨/顺铂化疗失败的局部晚期或转移性胆道癌的随机 II 期研究。
Eur J Cancer. 2021 Sep;154:288-295. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.06.019. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
6
Development and Validation of a Prognostic Nomogram Based on the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index for Resectable Gallbladder Cancer to Predict Survival and Chemotherapy Benefit.基于全身免疫炎症指数的可切除胆囊癌预后列线图的开发与验证,以预测生存及化疗获益
Front Oncol. 2021 Jun 29;11:692647. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.692647. eCollection 2021.
7
Hepatobiliary Cancers, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.肝胆肿瘤,2.2021 年版,NCCN 肿瘤学临床实践指南。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 May 1;19(5):541-565. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0022.
8
Hepatectomy strategy for T2 gallbladder cancer between segment IVb and V resection and wedge resection: A propensity score-matched study.肝 IVb 段和 V 段切除术与楔形切除术治疗 T2 胆囊癌的肝切除术策略:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Surgery. 2021 Jun;169(6):1304-1311. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.12.039. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
9
Biliary tract cancer.胆道癌。
Lancet. 2021 Jan 30;397(10272):428-444. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00153-7.
10
Cancer Statistics, 2021.癌症统计数据,2021.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jan;71(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21654. Epub 2021 Jan 12.