Department of Emergency Medicine, Adventist Health Ukiah Valley, Ukiah, California, United States of America.
Mathematica Policy Research.
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 11;15(11):e0241785. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241785. eCollection 2020.
After having an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), racial and ethnic minorities have less access to care, decreased rates of invasive treatments such as percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and worse outcomes compared with white patients. The objective of this study was to determine whether the Affordable Care Act's expansion of Medicaid eligibility was associated with changes in racial disparities in access, treatments, and outcomes after AMI.
Quasi-experimental, difference-in-differences-in-differences analysis of non-Hispanic white and minority patients with acute myocardial infarction in California and Florida from 2010-2015, using linear regression models to estimate the difference-in-differences. This population-based sample included all Medicaid and uninsured patients ages 18-64 hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction in California, which expanded Medicaid through the Affordable Care Act beginning as early as July 2011 in certain counties, and Florida, which did not expand Medicaid. The main outcomes included rates of admission to hospitals capable of performing PCI, rates of transfer for patients who first presented to hospitals that did not perform PCI, rates of PCI during hospitalization and rates of early (within 48 hours of admission) PCI, rates of readmission to the hospital within 30 days, and rates of in-hospital mortality.
A total of 55,991 hospital admissions met inclusion criteria, 32,540 of which were in California and 23,451 were in Florida. Among patients with AMI who initially presented to a non-PCI hospital, the likelihood of being transferred increased by 12 percentage points (95% CI 2 to 21) for minority patients relative to white patients after the Medicaid expansion. The likelihood of undergoing PCI increased by 3 percentage points (95% CI 0 to 5) for minority patients relative to white patients after the Medicaid expansion. We did not find an association between the Medicaid expansion and racial disparities in overall likelihood of admission to a PCI hospital, hospital readmissions, or in-hospital mortality.
The Medicaid expansion was associated with a decrease in racial disparities in transfers and rates of PCI after AMI. We did not find an association between the Medicaid expansion and admission to a PCI hospital, readmissions, and in-hospital mortality. Additional factors outside of insurance coverage likely continue to contribute to disparities in outcomes after AMI. These findings are crucial for policy makers seeking to reduce racial disparities in access, treatment and outcomes in AMI.
急性心肌梗死(AMI)后,与白人患者相比,少数族裔获得的医疗护理较少,接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)等侵入性治疗的比例较低,结局也更差。本研究旨在确定平价医疗法案扩大医疗补助资格后,AMI 患者的获得护理、治疗和结局方面的种族差异是否有所变化。
利用加州和佛罗里达州 2010-2015 年非西班牙裔白人和少数族裔 AMI 患者的准实验、差异中的差异中的差异分析,采用线性回归模型估计差异中的差异。该人群基于样本包括在加利福尼亚州因 AMI 住院的所有 Medicaid 和无保险患者(年龄 18-64 岁),加利福尼亚州自 2011 年 7 月起通过平价医疗法案开始扩大 Medicaid(在某些县),佛罗里达州没有扩大 Medicaid。主要结局包括 PCI 医院入院率、最初就诊于不能行 PCI 医院的患者转院率、住院期间 PCI 率、早期(入院后 48 小时内)PCI 率、30 天内再次入院率和住院期间死亡率。
共有 55991 例住院符合纳入标准,其中 32540 例来自加利福尼亚州,23451 例来自佛罗里达州。在最初就诊于非 PCI 医院的 AMI 患者中,与白人患者相比,少数民族患者的转院可能性增加了 12 个百分点(95%置信区间 2 至 21),这是 Medicaid 扩大后的结果。与白人患者相比,少数民族患者的 PCI 率增加了 3 个百分点(95%置信区间 0 至 5),这也是 Medicaid 扩大后的结果。我们没有发现 Medicaid 扩大与总体 PCI 医院入院、医院再入院或住院死亡率方面的种族差异之间存在关联。
Medicaid 扩大与 AMI 后转院和 PCI 率方面的种族差异减少有关。我们没有发现 Medicaid 扩大与 PCI 医院入院、再入院和住院死亡率之间存在关联。保险范围以外的其他因素可能继续导致 AMI 后结局的差异。这些发现对于寻求减少 AMI 患者在获得护理、治疗和结局方面的种族差异的政策制定者至关重要。