• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估医生在管理终末期疾病患者方面的实践情况的工具的开发。

The Development of Instrument to Assess Physician's Practice in the Management of Patients With Terminal Diseases.

机构信息

Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia.

出版信息

J Prim Care Community Health. 2020 Jan-Dec;11:2150132720972587. doi: 10.1177/2150132720972587.

DOI:10.1177/2150132720972587
PMID:33176544
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7675851/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The need for improving knowledge and practice of palliative care delivered by health workers become an agenda in several countries. In order to measure the practice, an instrument is needed. The study analyzed the validity and reliability of the instrument to assess the physician's practice in the management of patients with terminal diseases.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study involving 89 physicians practicing in primary health care. The instrument of practice has been developed and resulted 5 domains consist of 20 items. An overview of reliability, construct validity, uni-dimensionality, and hierarchy of the person-items of the instrument were analyzed using Rasch Model.

RESULTS

The reliability of the instrument is excellent with a person measure reliability of 0.85 and the item measure reliability of 0.96. Construct validity is confirmed with the MNSQ outfit values in the range of 0.54 to 1.59 and Pt Measure Corr. values in the range of 0.31 to 0.8. This instrument has a value of more than 20% unidimensionality which indicates the level of independence for items is good.

CONCLUSION

The instrument has good validity and reliability to assess physician's practice in the management of patients with terminal disease.

摘要

背景

提高卫生工作者提供的姑息治疗知识和实践的需求已成为许多国家的一项议程。为了衡量实践,需要一种工具。本研究分析了该工具评估医生在管理终末期疾病患者方面的实践的有效性和可靠性。

方法

这是一项涉及 89 名在初级保健中执业的医生的横断面研究。实践工具已经开发出来,由 5 个领域组成,共 20 个项目。使用 Rasch 模型分析了工具的人员-项目的可靠性、结构有效性、单维性和层次结构的概述。

结果

该工具的可靠性非常好,人员测量可靠性为 0.85,项目测量可靠性为 0.96。结构有效性得到了确认,MNSQ 成套值在 0.54 到 1.59 之间,Pt Measure Corr. 值在 0.31 到 0.8 之间。该工具具有超过 20%的单维性,表明项目的独立性水平良好。

结论

该工具具有良好的有效性和可靠性,可评估医生在管理终末期疾病患者方面的实践。

相似文献

1
The Development of Instrument to Assess Physician's Practice in the Management of Patients With Terminal Diseases.评估医生在管理终末期疾病患者方面的实践情况的工具的开发。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2020 Jan-Dec;11:2150132720972587. doi: 10.1177/2150132720972587.
2
Development, validation and reliability of a questionnaire for assessment of physician's knowledge, attitude and practices (KAPs) regarding foodborne diseases in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.开发、验证并确立评估沙特阿拉伯王国医生对食源性疾病的知识、态度和实践(KAPs)的问卷。
F1000Res. 2021 Jun 14;10:470. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.52997.2. eCollection 2021.
3
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
4
Validation and Reliability of Healthcare Workers' Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Instrument for Uncomplicated Malaria by Rasch Measurement Model.基于拉施测量模型的医护人员对单纯性疟疾的知识、态度和实践工具的效度与信度研究
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Jan 10;10:1521. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01521. eCollection 2019.
5
[Psychometric characteristics of questionnaires designed to assess the knowledge, perceptions and practices of health care professionals with regards to alcoholic patients].[旨在评估医护人员对酒精依赖患者的知识、认知及实践情况的调查问卷的心理测量学特征]
Encephale. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):437-46. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95458-9.
6
Psychometric properties of the Malay version of the Women's Views of Birth Labour Satisfaction Questionnaire using the Rasch measurement model: a cross sectional study.使用 Rasch 测量模型评估马来语版女性分娩满意度问卷的心理测量特性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 May 14;20(1):295. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02975-z.
7
Rasch analysis of the Roland disability questionnaire.罗兰残疾问卷的拉施分析
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jan 1;28(1):79-84. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200301010-00019.
8
Rasch Analysis of Reliability and Validity of Scores From the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM).足踝功能测量表(FAAM)得分的信度和效度的 Rasch 分析。
Foot Ankle Int. 2020 Feb;41(2):229-236. doi: 10.1177/1071100719884554. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
9
Rasch analysis of the perceptions of palliative care instrument (PPCI) in patients with advanced cancer.晚期癌症患者对姑息治疗工具(PPCI)认知的拉施分析。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Apr;31(3):e14153. doi: 10.1111/jep.14153. Epub 2024 Oct 13.
10
Development and initial validation of the Respirator Comfort, Wearing Experience, and Function Instrument [R-COMFI].呼吸器舒适度、佩戴体验及功能量表[R-COMFI]的开发与初步验证
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2017 Feb;14(2):135-147. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2016.1237025.

引用本文的文献

1
Item Analysis of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adults Version Using the Rasch Model in Two Forms for People With Schizophrenia in Taiwan.台湾精神分裂症患者执行功能行为评定量表成人版两种形式的拉施模型项目分析
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2025 Sep;34(3):e70034. doi: 10.1002/mpr.70034.
2
Validation of Hamdan intelligence scale in upper elementary grades using the Rasch model: exploratory study.使用拉施模型对上小学高年级学生进行哈姆丹智力量表的验证:探索性研究。
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 30;15:1407734. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1407734. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Palliative care in primary care: European Forum for Primary Care position paper.基层医疗中的姑息治疗:欧洲基层医疗论坛立场文件
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2019 Sep 18;20:e133. doi: 10.1017/S1463423619000641.
2
Implementation of palliative care for patients with terminal diseases from the viewpoint of healthcare personnel.从医护人员角度看终末期疾病患者姑息治疗的实施情况。
BMC Res Notes. 2019 Apr 8;12(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4260-x.
3
Construction and Validation of the 21 Item Fitness-to-Drive Screening Measure Short-Form.
21项驾驶适宜性筛查量表简表的构建与验证
Front Public Health. 2018 Dec 6;6:339. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00339. eCollection 2018.
4
A Rasch Analysis of the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale.整体舒缓治疗结局量表的 Rasch 分析。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Feb;57(2):290-296. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.11.019. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
5
Development and validation of the quality care questionnaire -palliative care (QCQ-PC): patient-reported assessment of quality of palliative care.质量关怀问卷-姑息治疗(QCQ-PC)的制定与验证:姑息治疗质量的患者报告评估。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Mar 5;17(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0296-2.
6
Using the Rasch Model to Develop a Measure of Participation Capturing the Full Range of Participation Characteristics for the Patients with Hand Injuries.使用拉施模型开发一种参与度测量方法,以捕捉手部损伤患者的全方位参与特征。
J Hand Microsurg. 2017 Aug;9(2):84-91. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1604060. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
7
The nutrition for sport knowledge questionnaire (NSKQ): development and validation using classical test theory and Rasch analysis.运动营养知识问卷(NSKQ):基于经典测试理论和拉施分析的编制与验证
J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2017 Aug 3;14:26. doi: 10.1186/s12970-017-0182-y. eCollection 2017.
8
Item analysis using Rasch models confirms that the Danish versions of the DISABKIDS® chronic-generic and diabetes-specific modules are valid and reliable.使用拉施模型进行的项目分析证实,DISABKIDS®慢性病通用模块和糖尿病特定模块的丹麦语版本是有效且可靠的。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Mar 1;15(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0618-8.
9
Rasch Analysis for Instrument Development: Why, When, and How?用于工具开发的拉施分析:为何、何时以及如何进行?
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 Winter;15(4). doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-04-0148.
10
Rasch Analysis of The WURSS-21 Dimensional Validation and Assessment of Invariance.WURSS-21维度验证与不变性评估的拉施分析
J Lung Pulm Respir Res. 2016;3(2). doi: 10.15406/jlprr.2015.03.00076. Epub 2016 Apr 11.