Suppr超能文献

绿藻门中对水生和陆生环境的适应

Adaptation to Aquatic and Terrestrial Environments in (Chlorophyta).

作者信息

Aigner Siegfried, Glaser Karin, Arc Erwann, Holzinger Andreas, Schletter Michael, Karsten Ulf, Kranner Ilse

机构信息

Department of Botany, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.

出版信息

Front Microbiol. 2020 Oct 15;11:585836. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.585836. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

The globally distributed green microalga (Chlorophyta) colonizes aquatic and terrestrial habitats, but the molecular mechanisms underpinning survival in these two contrasting environments are far from understood. Here, we compared the authentic strain of from an aquatic habitat with a strain from a terrestrial high alpine habitat previously determined as . Molecular phylogeny of SSU rDNA (823 bp) showed that the two strains differed by one nucleotide only. Sequencing of the ITS2 region confirmed that both strains belong to the same species, but to distinct ribotypes. Therefore, the terrestrial strain was re-assessed as . To study the response to environmental conditions experienced on land, we assessed the effects of irradiance and temperature on growth, of temperature on photosynthesis and respiration, and of desiccation and rehydration on photosynthetic performance. In contrast to the aquatic strain, the terrestrial strain tolerated higher temperatures and light conditions, had a higher photosynthesis-to-respiration ratio at 25°C, still grew at 30°C and was able to fully recover photosynthetic performance after desiccation at 84% relative humidity. The two strains differed most in their response to the dehydration/rehydration treatment, which was further investigated by untargeted GC-MS-based metabolite profiling to gain insights into metabolic traits differentiating the two strains. The two strains differed in their allocation of carbon and nitrogen into their primary metabolites. Overall, the terrestrial strain had higher contents of readily available nitrogen-based metabolites, especially amino acids and the polyamine putrescine. Dehydration and rehydration led to differential regulation of the amino acid metabolism, the tricarboxylic acid cycle and sucrose metabolism. The data are discussed with a view to differences in phenotypic plasticity of the two strains, and we suggest that the two genetically almost identical strains are attractive models to study mechanisms that protect from abiotic stress factors, which are more frequent in terrestrial than aquatic habitats, such as desiccation and irradiation.

摘要

这种全球分布的绿色微藻(绿藻门)栖息于水生和陆地生境,但支撑其在这两种截然不同环境中生存的分子机制仍远未明晰。在此,我们将来自水生栖息地的正宗菌株与先前确定为[具体菌株名称未给出]的来自陆地高海拔栖息地的菌株进行了比较。小亚基核糖体DNA(823碱基对)的分子系统发育分析表明,这两种菌株仅相差一个核苷酸。内转录间隔区2(ITS2)区域的测序证实,这两种菌株属于同一物种,但属于不同的核糖型。因此,陆地菌株被重新评估为[具体重新评估后的名称未给出]。为研究对陆地环境条件的响应,我们评估了光照强度和温度对生长的影响、温度对光合作用和呼吸作用的影响,以及干燥和复水对光合性能的影响。与水生菌株相比,陆地菌株能耐受更高的温度和光照条件,在25°C时具有更高的光合呼吸比,在30°C时仍能生长,并且在相对湿度84%的条件下干燥后能够完全恢复光合性能。这两种菌株在对脱水/复水处理的响应上差异最大,通过基于非靶向气相色谱-质谱联用的代谢物谱分析对其进行了进一步研究,以深入了解区分这两种菌株的代谢特征。这两种菌株在将碳和氮分配到初级代谢物方面存在差异。总体而言,陆地菌株中易于利用的含氮代谢物含量更高,尤其是氨基酸和多胺腐胺。脱水和复水导致氨基酸代谢、三羧酸循环和蔗糖代谢的差异调节。结合这两种菌株表型可塑性的差异对数据进行了讨论,我们认为这两种基因几乎相同的[菌株名称未给出]菌株是研究抵御非生物胁迫因素机制的有吸引力的模型,这些非生物胁迫因素在陆地栖息地比水生栖息地更频繁,如干燥和辐射。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d292/7593248/f6b759ea5191/fmicb-11-585836-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验