Department of Neurology, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany.
Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance (IPA), Institute of the Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Neural Plast. 2020 Oct 28;2020:9125913. doi: 10.1155/2020/9125913. eCollection 2020.
Most of the occupational exposure limits (OELs) are based on local irritants. However, exposure to much lower concentrations of irritant substances can also lead to health complaints from workers. Exposure to irritants is often accompanied by strong unpleasant odors, and strong odors might have distracting effects and hence pose a safety risk. The findings obtained in human exposure studies with chemically sensitive, stressed, or anxious persons suggest that their ability to direct attention away from the odorous exposure and to focus on a cognitive task is reduced. In addition, after repeated odor exposure, these persons show signs of sensitization, i.e., difficulties in ignoring or getting used to the exposure. The question arises as to whether certain health conditions are accompanied by a change in sensitivity to odors and irritants, so that these persons are potentially more distracted by odors and irritants and therefore more challenged in working memory tasks than nonsusceptible persons. In our study, susceptible persons with sensory airway hyperreactivity ("capsaicin-sensitive") respond more strongly to mechanical skin stimuli than controls and show altered network connectivity. Capsaicin-sensitive subjects have a lower pain threshold and thus are more sensitive to mechanical skin stimuli. The intrinsic functional connectivity of their saliency network is higher, and the lower the GABAergic tone of the thalamus, the higher their pain sensitivity to mechanical stimuli. It seems that the increased communication between resting-state networks promotes a stronger perception of the sensory input signal. The results can be used to inform about actual risks (i.e., attention diversion and increased risk of accidents) and "pseudo" risks such as odor perception without a negative impact on one's well-being. This way, uncertainties that still prevail in the health assessment of odorous and sensory irritating chemicals could be reduced.
大多数职业接触限值(OELs)都是基于局部刺激性物质制定的。然而,即使接触低浓度的刺激性物质,也可能会引起工人出现健康问题。接触刺激性物质通常伴随着强烈的难闻气味,强烈的气味可能会分散注意力,从而构成安全风险。在对敏感、紧张或焦虑的人进行人体暴露研究时发现,他们将注意力从有气味的暴露中转移开并专注于认知任务的能力会降低。此外,这些人在反复暴露于气味后会出现过敏迹象,即难以忽略或适应暴露。由此产生的问题是,某些健康状况是否会伴随着对气味和刺激性物质的敏感性变化,从而使这些人更容易受到气味和刺激性物质的干扰,因此在工作记忆任务中比不易感的人更具挑战性。在我们的研究中,具有感觉性气道高反应性(“辣椒素敏感”)的易感人群对机械性皮肤刺激的反应比对照组更强烈,并表现出网络连接改变。辣椒素敏感者的疼痛阈值较低,因此对机械性皮肤刺激更敏感。他们的突显网络的固有功能连接性更高,丘脑 GABA 能神经传递的抑制性降低,对机械刺激的疼痛敏感性就越高。似乎静息状态网络之间增加的通讯促进了对感觉输入信号的更强感知。研究结果可用于告知实际风险(即注意力转移和事故风险增加)和“伪”风险(例如气味感知,而不会对幸福感产生负面影响)。这样,就可以减少在评估有气味和感官刺激性化学物质的健康影响方面仍然存在的不确定性。