Howson Alexandra, Turell Wendy
Thistle Editorial, LLC, Snoqualmie, WA, USA.
CME Outcomes and Analytics, PlatformQ Health Education, Needham, MA, USA.
J Eur CME. 2020 Oct 16;9(1):1834760. doi: 10.1080/21614083.2020.1834760.
Qualitative analysis is often used to gather insights about learning, behavioural and practice change. Given the rich detail that qualitative data delivers, we are puzzled at the relative absence of qualitative approaches to outcomes assessment in the field of CME/CPD, especially as patient-directed education becomes increasingly tethered or adjunctive to CME/CPD programmes as a way to directly engage patients in disease self-management and improve health outcomes. Education outcomes for both clinicians and patients are contextualised by norms, motivations, and values that shape how learners interact with education activities and materials. These properties are linked to and shape the mechanisms that drive education outcomes but are rarely the focus of assessments that are often rooted in quantitative, positivist frameworks. In order to illustrate the role that qualitative methodologies can play in outcomes assessment, we describe insights from three education programmes designed to improve the health of patients with specific conditions and outline a range of qualitative methodologies appropriate for outcomes evaluation.
定性分析常用于收集有关学习、行为和实践变化的见解。鉴于定性数据所提供的丰富细节,我们对继续医学教育/持续专业发展(CME/CPD)领域中相对缺乏用于结果评估的定性方法感到困惑,尤其是当以患者为导向的教育越来越多地与CME/CPD项目相结合或作为其辅助手段,以此让患者直接参与疾病自我管理并改善健康结果时。临床医生和患者的教育结果都受到规范、动机和价值观的影响,这些因素塑造了学习者与教育活动及材料的互动方式。这些特性与驱动教育结果的机制相关联并对其产生影响,但它们很少成为通常基于定量实证主义框架的评估重点。为了说明定性方法在结果评估中可以发挥的作用,我们描述了来自三个旨在改善特定疾病患者健康状况的教育项目的见解,并概述了一系列适用于结果评估的定性方法。