Rehman Fazal U, Khan Asadullah, Aziz Adil, Iqbal Madiha, Mahmood Saad Bin Zafar, Ali Naureen
Department of Medicine, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, PAK.
Department of Rheumatology, Fatima Memorial College of Medicine and Dentistry, Lahore, PAK.
Cureus. 2020 Oct 8;12(10):e10851. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10851.
Background Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) can be easily calculated from the white cell differential count and is considered an auspicious marker for predicting different diseases, including sepsis. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of NLR as a sepsis marker by comparing it with other markers of sepsis, such as C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin, and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. Methods A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted at the Aga Khan University Hospital from July 2019 to December 2019. A total of 168 patients who were admitted to the medicine department with a diagnosis of sepsis on arrival or during the hospital stay were enrolled. The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio was calculated to form venous samples taken on admission and compared to the level of CRP, procalcitonin, culture reports, and the SOFA score as a predictor of sepsis. Results Out of 168 patients, 55.3% were male. The median age of the participants was 68.40 (interquartile range (IQR): 19.5) years in males and 64.0 (IQR: 18.0) in females. Procalcitonin was performed in 121 (72%) and CRP performed in 61 (36.3%) patients. The NLR showed significant associations with all the tested lab parameters of sepsis, such as CRP (p = 0.02), procalcitonin (p = 0.01), and SOFA score (p = 0.01). Values when analyzed according to culture-positive showed higher values in culture-positive samples but were not statistically significant. Conclusion Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is a cheap and rapidly available predictor of sepsis and has shown a significant correlation with other relatively expensive and non-rapidly existing markers of inflammation and sepsis. However, large prospective studies are needed to prove its real effectiveness as a marker of sepsis and its prognosis.
背景 中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)可通过白细胞分类计数轻松计算得出,被认为是预测包括脓毒症在内的不同疾病的一个良好指标。在本研究中,我们旨在通过将NLR与其他脓毒症标志物(如C反应蛋白(CRP)、降钙素原和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分)进行比较,来比较NLR作为脓毒症标志物的效能。方法 于2019年7月至2019年12月在阿迦汗大学医院开展了一项横断面分析研究。共纳入168例入院时或住院期间被诊断为脓毒症的内科患者。计算入院时采集的静脉样本中的中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值,并与CRP水平、降钙素原、培养报告以及作为脓毒症预测指标的SOFA评分进行比较。结果 168例患者中,55.3%为男性。男性参与者的年龄中位数为68.40(四分位间距(IQR):19.5)岁,女性为64.0(IQR:18.0)岁。121例(72%)患者检测了降钙素原,61例(36.3%)患者检测了CRP。NLR与所有测试的脓毒症实验室参数均显示出显著相关性,如CRP(p = 0.02)、降钙素原(p = 0.01)和SOFA评分(p = 0.01)。根据培养结果为阳性进行分析时,培养阳性样本中的值较高,但无统计学意义。结论 中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值是一种廉价且可快速获得的脓毒症预测指标,并且已显示出与其他相对昂贵且非快速可得的炎症和脓毒症标志物具有显著相关性。然而,需要大型前瞻性研究来证明其作为脓毒症标志物及其预后的实际有效性。