Department of Psychology.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Dec;117(6):1164-1188. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000224. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
Self-regulation describes the ability to control both behaviors and internal states against a backdrop of conflicting or distracting situations, drives, or impulses. In the cognitive psychology tradition, individual differences in self-regulation are commonly measured with performance-based tests of executive functioning, whereas in the personality psychology tradition, individual differences in self-regulation are typically assessed with report-based measures of impulse control, sustained motivation, and perseverance. The goal of this project was (a) to comprehensively examine the structure of associations between multiple self-regulatory constructs stemming from the cognitive and personality psychology traditions; (b) to estimate how these constructs, individually and collectively, related to mathematics and reading ability beyond psychometric measures of processing speed and fluid intelligence; and (c) to estimate the extent to which genetic and environmental factors mediated the observed associations. Data were available for 1,019 child participants from the Texas Twin Project ( age = 10.79, range = 7.8-15.5). Results highlighted the differentiation among cognitive and personality aspects of self-regulation, both at observed and genetic levels. After accounting for processing speed and fluid intelligence, EF remained a significant predictor of reading and mathematics ability. Educationally relevant measures of personality-particularly an openness factor representing curiosity and intellectual self-concept-incrementally contributed to individual differences in reading ability. Collectively, measures of cognition, self-regulation, and other educationally relevant aspects of personality accounted for the entirety of genetic variance in mathematics and reading ability. The current findings point to the important independent role that each construct plays in academic settings. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
自我调节描述了在冲突或分散注意力的情况下控制行为和内部状态的能力,驱动或冲动。在认知心理学传统中,个体差异的自我调节通常是通过执行功能的基于表现的测试来衡量的,而在人格心理学传统中,个体差异的自我调节通常是通过基于报告的冲动控制、持续动机和毅力的测量来评估的。该项目的目的是:(a)全面检查来自认知和人格心理学传统的多个自我调节结构之间的关联结构;(b)估计这些结构,单独和集体,如何与数学和阅读能力相关,超出心理测量的处理速度和流体智力测量;(c)估计遗传和环境因素在观察到的关联中起中介作用的程度。德克萨斯双胞胎项目(年龄= 10.79,范围= 7.8-15.5)为 1019 名儿童参与者提供了数据。结果突出了自我调节的认知和人格方面的差异,无论是在观察水平还是遗传水平上。在考虑到处理速度和流体智力后,EF 仍然是阅读和数学能力的重要预测因素。人格的教育相关测量——特别是代表好奇心和知识自我概念的开放性因素——对阅读能力的个体差异有额外的贡献。集体来看,认知、自我调节和其他教育相关的人格方面的测量解释了数学和阅读能力的全部遗传变异。目前的发现表明,每个结构在学术环境中都起着重要的独立作用。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。