• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自豪:一项元分析研究。

Pride: A meta-analytic project.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

Emotion. 2022 Aug;22(5):1071-1087. doi: 10.1037/emo0000905. Epub 2020 Nov 12.

DOI:10.1037/emo0000905
PMID:33180528
Abstract

Pride is a complex construct, at times conceptualized positively (as a positive emotional reaction to a personal success) and at other times defined negatively (as exhibiting arrogant or conceited feelings and beliefs). Based on this dichotomy, Tracy and Robins (2007) proposed that pride consists of two facets: authentic pride (AP) and hubristic pride (HP). For over a decade, researchers have used this two-facet model to investigate similarities and differences between AP and HP. The current work aims to synthesize this body of research by presenting findings from a meta-analysis of the association between AP and HP and a wide range of personality characteristics, mental health outcomes, social status constructs, and attributional tendencies. Comprised of 94 independent samples ( = 64,698) of predominantly North American adults, meta-analyses (both unweighted and weighted random effects models) were conducted for the relationship between AP and HP, and for each outcome variable separately, resulting in 103 total analyses (s = 2-93). This project provides strong evidence that AP and HP are empirically distinct constructs (meta-analytic = .13) that often align in opposite ways with personality and related variables, with AP exhibiting associations that suggest better psychological health than HP. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

骄傲是一个复杂的结构,有时被概念化为积极的(作为对个人成功的积极情绪反应),有时被定义为消极的(表现出傲慢或自负的感觉和信念)。基于这种二分法,特雷西和罗宾斯(2007 年)提出骄傲由两个方面组成:真实的骄傲(AP)和自大的骄傲(HP)。十多年来,研究人员一直使用这种双方面模型来研究 AP 和 HP 之间的相似之处和不同之处。目前的工作旨在通过对 AP 和 HP 与广泛的人格特征、心理健康结果、社会地位结构和归因倾向之间的关联进行元分析,来综合这一研究领域。该研究由 94 个独立的北美成年人样本(n = 64698)组成,对 AP 和 HP 之间的关系以及每个结果变量分别进行了元分析(未加权和加权随机效应模型),共进行了 103 次分析(s = 2-93)。该项目有力地证明了 AP 和 HP 是经验上不同的结构(元分析 =.13),它们通常与人格和相关变量以相反的方式一致,AP 表现出的关联表明比 HP 更好的心理健康。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Pride: A meta-analytic project.自豪:一项元分析研究。
Emotion. 2022 Aug;22(5):1071-1087. doi: 10.1037/emo0000905. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
2
The Authentic and Hubristic Pride scales do not validly assess the two-facet model of pride: Time to rewind and reboot with new measures.《真实与傲慢的骄傲量表》无法有效评估骄傲的两面模型:是时候用新的衡量标准来倒带和重新启动了。
Emotion. 2023 Apr;23(3):886-893. doi: 10.1037/emo0001142.
3
The viability and validity of the Authentic and Hubristic Pride scales: Reply to Dickens and Murphy (2023).《真实与傲慢的骄傲量表的可行性和有效性:对狄更斯和墨菲(2023)的回应》。
Emotion. 2023 Apr;23(3):894-898. doi: 10.1037/emo0001183.
4
Authentic/hubristic pride controversies as a window on broader emotion measurement issues: Reply to Tracy et al. (2023).真实/狂妄自大的骄傲争议作为更广泛情感测量问题的窗口:回复 Tracy 等人(2023 年)。
Emotion. 2023 Apr;23(3):899-902. doi: 10.1037/emo0001197.
5
Conceptual and empirical challenges to the "Authentic" versus "Hubristic" model of pride.“自豪”的“真实”与“傲慢”模型的概念和实证挑战。
Emotion. 2014 Feb;14(1):17-32. doi: 10.1037/a0031711. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
6
Further challenges to the "Authentic"/"Hubristic" model of pride: conceptual clarifications and new evidence.进一步挑战“自豪的真实/狂妄模型”:概念澄清和新证据。
Emotion. 2014 Feb;14(1):38-42. doi: 10.1037/a0035457.
7
A paradox of pride: Hubristic pride predicts strategic dishonesty in response to status threats.骄傲的悖论:傲慢的骄傲预测了对地位威胁的策略性不诚实。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Jul;151(7):1681-1706. doi: 10.1037/xge0001158. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
8
Implicit association between authentic pride and prestige compared to hubristic pride and dominance.与傲慢的骄傲和支配欲相比,真实的骄傲与声望之间的隐性关联。
Psychol Rep. 2012 Oct;111(2):424-42. doi: 10.2466/07.09.17.PR0.111.5.424-442.
9
Amplitude of Low-Frequency Fluctuations During Resting State Differentially Predicts Authentic and Hubristic Pride.静息态低频振幅波动能够区分真实和浮夸的骄傲。
J Pers. 2018 Apr;86(2):213-219. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12306. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
10
Authentic and hubristic pride: Differential effects on delay of gratification.真诚与自大的骄傲:对延迟满足的差异化影响。
Emotion. 2016 Dec;16(8):1147-1156. doi: 10.1037/emo0000179. Epub 2016 Oct 10.

引用本文的文献

1
ReNeuWell mental well-being app: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.ReNeuWell心理健康应用程序:一项随机对照试验的方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 15;15(4):e094557. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094557.
2
Helping others in real life and in the laboratory: pride and prosocial behavior.在现实生活和实验室中帮助他人:自豪感和亲社会行为。
Curr Issues Personal Psychol. 2024 Feb 8;12(4):250-257. doi: 10.5114/cipp/181144. eCollection 2024.
3
Successful emotion regulation cognitive reappraisal in authentic pride: Behavioral and event-related potential evidence.
真实自豪中成功的情绪调节——认知重评:行为及事件相关电位证据
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Oct 13;16:983674. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.983674. eCollection 2022.
4
Prestige and Dominance: How eWOM Differs Between Consumers High in Authentic and Hubristic Pride.声望与主导地位:真实自豪和傲慢自豪程度高的消费者之间的电子口碑差异
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 15;13:898946. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.898946. eCollection 2022.
5
The Chicken and Egg of Pride and Social Rank.骄傲与社会地位的先有鸡还是先有蛋的问题。
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2022 Mar;13(2):382-389. doi: 10.1177/19485506211023619. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
6
Factor Structure of the "Top Ten" Positive Emotions of Barbara Fredrickson.芭芭拉·弗雷德里克森“十大”积极情绪的因素结构
Front Psychol. 2021 May 14;12:641804. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.641804. eCollection 2021.