Mead Taryn, Coley David, Borden D Scott
School of Business, Western Colorado University, Gunnison, CO 81231, USA.
Department of Architecture & Civil Engineering, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK.
Biomimetics (Basel). 2020 Nov 9;5(4):60. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics5040060.
The disparity between disciplinary approaches to bioinspired innovation has created a cultural divide that is stifling to the overall advancement of the approach for sustainable societies. This paper aims to advance the effectiveness of bioinspired innovation processes for positive benefits through interdisciplinary communication by exploring the epistemological assumptions in various fields that contribute to the discipline. We propose that there is a shift in epistemological assumptions within bioinspired innovation processes at the points where biological models derived from reductionist approaches are interpreted as socially-constructed design principles, which are then realized in practical settings wrought with complexity and multiplicity. This epistemological shift from one position to another frequently leaves practitioners with erroneous assumptions due to a naturalistic fallacy. Drawing on examples in biology, we provide three recommendations to improve the clarity of the dialogue amongst interdisciplinary teams. (1) The deliberate articulation of epistemological perspectives amongst team members. (2) The application of a gradient orientation towards sustainability instead of a dichotomous orientation. (3) Ongoing dialogue and further research to develop novel epistemological approaches towards the topic. Adopting these recommendations could further advance the effectiveness of bioinspired innovation processes to positively impact social and ecological systems.
生物启发式创新的学科方法之间的差异造成了一种文化鸿沟,这阻碍了该方法在可持续社会中的整体发展。本文旨在通过探索各学科中有助于该学科发展的认识论假设,通过跨学科交流提高生物启发式创新过程的有效性,以实现积极效益。我们认为,在生物启发式创新过程中,当从还原论方法得出的生物学模型被解释为社会建构的设计原则,然后在充满复杂性和多样性的实际环境中得以实现时,认识论假设会发生转变。由于自然主义谬误,这种从一种立场到另一种立场的认识论转变常常使从业者产生错误的假设。借鉴生物学中的例子,我们提出三条建议以提高跨学科团队之间对话的清晰度。(1)团队成员之间有意识地阐明认识论观点。(2)采用梯度式的可持续发展导向而非二分法导向。(3)持续对话并开展进一步研究,以开发针对该主题的新颖认识论方法。采纳这些建议可以进一步提高生物启发式创新过程的有效性,从而对社会和生态系统产生积极影响。