• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内在动机对科学知识持续贡献到在线知识共享平台的影响。

Influence of intrinsic motivations on the continuity of scientific knowledge contribution to online knowledge-sharing platforms.

机构信息

Beijing Normal University, China.

Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, China.

出版信息

Public Underst Sci. 2021 May;30(4):369-383. doi: 10.1177/0963662520970782. Epub 2020 Nov 13.

DOI:10.1177/0963662520970782
PMID:33183156
Abstract

Scientific knowledge contribution to online knowledge-sharing platforms has long been regarded as instrumental behavior based on utilitarian considerations. Employing cognitive evaluation theory, this study examines scientific expert users' behavioral metrics to understand the factors responsible for users continuing to contribute their scientific knowledge for an extended period or a very short span. We found that expert users' intrinsic motivations, which has received little attention in recent studies, constitute an important indicator of sustained online scientific knowledge contribution. Furthermore, although social rewards fail to predict the continuity of scientific knowledge contribution, they prolong the duration of knowledge contribution by enhancing the intrinsic motivations of expert users. In conclusion, a self-reinforcement mechanism underlies the relationship of intrinsic motivation with social rewards, which governs continuous online scientific knowledge contribution behavior.

摘要

科学知识对在线知识共享平台的贡献长期以来一直被视为基于功利考虑的工具性行为。本研究运用认知评价理论,考察了科学专家用户的行为指标,以了解导致用户持续贡献科学知识的因素,无论是长期还是短期。我们发现,专家用户的内在动机在最近的研究中很少受到关注,是持续在线科学知识贡献的一个重要指标。此外,尽管社会奖励并不能预测科学知识贡献的连续性,但它们通过增强专家用户的内在动机来延长知识贡献的持续时间。总之,内在动机与社会奖励之间的关系存在自我强化机制,这种机制支配着持续的在线科学知识贡献行为。

相似文献

1
Influence of intrinsic motivations on the continuity of scientific knowledge contribution to online knowledge-sharing platforms.内在动机对科学知识持续贡献到在线知识共享平台的影响。
Public Underst Sci. 2021 May;30(4):369-383. doi: 10.1177/0963662520970782. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
2
The effects of factors on the motivations for knowledge sharing in online health communities: A benefit-cost perspective.因素对在线健康社区知识共享动机的影响:收益-成本视角。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 12;18(6):e0286675. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286675. eCollection 2023.
3
Understanding the factors influencing health professionals' online voluntary behaviors: Evidence from YiXinLi, a Chinese online health community for mental health.理解影响健康专业人员在线志愿行为的因素:来自中国心理健康在线社区“医心一意”的证据。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Oct;130:103939. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.07.018. Epub 2019 Aug 3.
4
Examining the Effect of Knowledge Seeking on Knowledge Contribution in Q&A Communities.探究问答社区中知识寻求对知识贡献的影响。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Sep 23;14(9):853. doi: 10.3390/bs14090853.
5
Short video users' personality traits and social sharing motivation.短视频用户的个性特征与社交分享动机。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 9;13:1046735. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1046735. eCollection 2022.
6
Information-Sharing Behavior on WeChat Moments: The Role of Anonymity, Familiarity, and Intrinsic Motivation.微信朋友圈中的信息分享行为:匿名性、熟悉度和内在动机的作用。
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 14;10:2540. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02540. eCollection 2019.
7
What motivates online community contributors to contribute consistently? A case study on Stackoverflow netizens.是什么促使在线社区贡献者持续做出贡献?以Stackoverflow网民为例的一项案例研究。
Curr Psychol. 2023;42(13):10468-10481. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03307-4. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
8
Exploring the Relationship Between Users' Psychological Contracts and Their Knowledge Contribution in Online Health Communities.探索在线健康社区中用户心理契约与其知识贡献之间的关系。
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 10;12:612030. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.612030. eCollection 2021.
9
Sharing health information across online platforms: A systematic review.在线平台共享健康信息:系统评价。
Health Commun. 2023 Jul;38(8):1550-1562. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2021.2019920. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
10
"The double-edged sword of inflated help": Unravelling the motivation crowding in community question-answering platforms.“膨胀的帮助的双刃剑”:揭开社区问答平台中动机拥挤的面纱。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 13;19(3):e0297627. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297627. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
The development and validation of a self-reinforcement scale for repeated blood donation.重复献血自我强化量表的编制与验证
BMC Psychol. 2025 Aug 29;13(1):984. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03186-x.
2
Keep posting and following social media profiles about physical therapy, but be aware! A cross-sectional study of social media posts on Instagram and Twitter.继续发布和关注有关物理治疗的社交媒体资料,但请注意!对 Instagram 和 Twitter 上社交媒体帖子的横断面研究。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2023 Jan-Feb;27(1):100484. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2023.100484. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
3
Dynamics of the social construction of knowledge: an empirical study of Zhihu in China.
知识的社会建构动态:对中国知乎的实证研究
EPJ Data Sci. 2022;11(1):35. doi: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00346-6. Epub 2022 Jun 4.