Suppr超能文献

重复献血自我强化量表的编制与验证

The development and validation of a self-reinforcement scale for repeated blood donation.

作者信息

Hu Huahua, Mo Phoenix K H, Hu Qiuyue, Nie Yangang, Kuang Hujiao, Lau Joseph T F, Hu Wei

机构信息

Blood Center of Zhejiang Province, 789 Jianye Road Binjiang District, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China.

Center for Health Behaviors Research, School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

BMC Psychol. 2025 Aug 29;13(1):984. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03186-x.

Abstract

The current study aimed to develop and validate a self-reinforcement scale for repeated blood donation (SRS-RBD). In Study 1, six items were created, and the factor structure of SRS-RBD was explored among 155 Chinese student blood donors. In Study 2, SRS-RBD was validated among 164 donors. In Study 3, a total of 850 blood donors were invited to participate in an online-survey measuring SRS-RBD at baseline, and their RBD behavior was captured 6 months later. A two-factor structure of SRS-RBD was established in Study 1 and further validated in Study 2 and Study 3. The SRS-RBD demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity. A cut-off score of 20 was suggested as having the best performance to identify donors who had a high chance to re-donate. The SRS-RBD can be considered reliable in measuring the self-reinforcement of RBD among blood donors. The scale may be a useful tool in blood donation practice and research programs.

摘要

本研究旨在开发并验证重复献血自我强化量表(SRS-RBD)。在研究1中,创建了6个条目,并在155名中国学生献血者中探索了SRS-RBD的因子结构。在研究2中,对164名献血者进行了SRS-RBD验证。在研究3中,共邀请了850名献血者参加一项在线调查,在基线时测量SRS-RBD,并在6个月后记录他们的重复献血行为。研究1中建立了SRS-RBD的双因子结构,并在研究2和研究3中进一步验证。SRS-RBD显示出令人满意的信效度。建议以20分为临界值,其在识别有高重复献血可能性的献血者方面表现最佳。SRS-RBD在测量献血者重复献血的自我强化方面可被认为是可靠的。该量表可能是献血实践和研究项目中的一个有用工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03b1/12395899/b2bbc30ac728/40359_2025_3186_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The development and validation of a self-reinforcement scale for repeated blood donation.
BMC Psychol. 2025 Aug 29;13(1):984. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03186-x.
3
The Design of Large-Scale Plasma Donation Trials.
Stat Med. 2025 Jul;44(15-17):e70181. doi: 10.1002/sim.70181.
4
A systematic review and meta-analysis of antecedents of blood donation behavior and intentions.
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Nov;96:86-94. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.07.022. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
7
Bone marrow harvest versus peripheral stem cell collection for haemopoietic stem cell donation in healthy donors.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21(1):CD006406. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006406.pub2.
8
The health impacts of blood donation: a systematic review of donor and non-donor perceptions.
Blood Transfus. 2024 Jan;22(1):7-19. doi: 10.2450/BloodTransfus.494. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
10
Evolving deferral criteria for blood donation in France: Plasma donation by men who have sex with men.
Vox Sang. 2023 Jun;118(6):440-446. doi: 10.1111/vox.13435. Epub 2023 May 14.

本文引用的文献

2
The Development of a Short Chinese Version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 May 9;13:854547. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.854547. eCollection 2022.
6
Influence of intrinsic motivations on the continuity of scientific knowledge contribution to online knowledge-sharing platforms.
Public Underst Sci. 2021 May;30(4):369-383. doi: 10.1177/0963662520970782. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
8
Childhood Emotional Incest Scale (CEIS): Development, validation, cross-validation, and reliability.
J Couns Psychol. 2021 Jan;68(1):98-111. doi: 10.1037/cou0000439. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
9
Population-based projections of blood supply and demand, China, 2017-2036.
Bull World Health Organ. 2020 Jan 1;98(1):10-18. doi: 10.2471/BLT.19.233361. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
10
Predicting blood donation intention: the importance of fear.
Transfusion. 2019 Dec;59(12):3666-3673. doi: 10.1111/trf.15554. Epub 2019 Oct 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验