• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

知识的社会建构动态:对中国知乎的实证研究

Dynamics of the social construction of knowledge: an empirical study of Zhihu in China.

作者信息

Zhang Lun, Li Yong-Ning, Peng Tai-Quan, Wu Ye

机构信息

School of Arts and Communication, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875 China.

School of Systems Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875 China.

出版信息

EPJ Data Sci. 2022;11(1):35. doi: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00346-6. Epub 2022 Jun 4.

DOI:10.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00346-6
PMID:35694703
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9166185/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

This study examined how the knowledge market promotes knowledge construction on question-and-answer (Q&A) websites. Data were collected from Zhihu, one of the largest Q&A sites in China. Hierarchical linear modeling was employed to estimate the dynamics of information accumulation, that is, the provision of informative content as factual construction. By employing information accumulation as the objective measure of knowledge construction, we determined that online knowledge construction was facilitated by a competitive marketplace of ideas. In addition, participation, temporal, and discourse features affected the dynamics of information accumulation. In specific, active users contributed significantly less to information accumulation than did ordinary users. Information accumulation shows a naturally decaying process represented as a function of answer order. The time interval between answers at the two preceding time points reduced the informativeness of answers at the subsequent time point. Answers with a higher readability score reduced the informativeness of subsequent answers. The results indicate that knowledge construction on Q&A sites unfolds as a process of mass collaboration among users.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00346-6.

摘要

未标注

本研究考察了知识市场如何在问答网站上促进知识构建。数据收集自中国最大的问答网站之一知乎。采用分层线性模型来估计信息积累的动态过程,即作为事实构建的信息性内容的提供。通过将信息积累作为知识构建的客观衡量标准,我们确定在线知识构建受到竞争性思想市场的促进。此外,参与度、时间和话语特征影响了信息积累的动态过程。具体而言,活跃用户对信息积累的贡献显著低于普通用户。信息积累呈现出自然衰减的过程,表现为回答顺序的函数。前两个时间点回答之间的时间间隔降低了后续时间点回答的信息性。可读性得分较高的回答降低了后续回答的信息性。结果表明,问答网站上的知识构建是用户之间大规模协作的过程。

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00346-6获取的补充材料。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ac6/9166185/07d0cbbb980e/13688_2022_346_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ac6/9166185/873ad650496f/13688_2022_346_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ac6/9166185/60ce7c63742b/13688_2022_346_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ac6/9166185/533884686577/13688_2022_346_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ac6/9166185/07d0cbbb980e/13688_2022_346_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ac6/9166185/873ad650496f/13688_2022_346_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ac6/9166185/60ce7c63742b/13688_2022_346_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ac6/9166185/533884686577/13688_2022_346_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ac6/9166185/07d0cbbb980e/13688_2022_346_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Dynamics of the social construction of knowledge: an empirical study of Zhihu in China.知识的社会建构动态:对中国知乎的实证研究
EPJ Data Sci. 2022;11(1):35. doi: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00346-6. Epub 2022 Jun 4.
2
Examining the Effect of Knowledge Seeking on Knowledge Contribution in Q&A Communities.探究问答社区中知识寻求对知识贡献的影响。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Sep 23;14(9):853. doi: 10.3390/bs14090853.
3
Users' Willingness to Share Health Information in a Social Question-and-Answer Community: Cross-sectional Survey in China.用户在社交问答社区中分享健康信息的意愿:中国的横断面调查
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Mar 30;9(3):e26265. doi: 10.2196/26265.
4
Patient Questions and Physician Responses in a Chinese Health Q&A Website: Content Analysis.中国健康问答网站上的患者问题与医生回复:内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 16;22(4):e13071. doi: 10.2196/13071.
5
Modeling the Use of Online Knowledge Community: A Perspective of Needs-Affordances-Features.在线知识社区使用建模:一种需求-供给-特征的视角。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2021 Dec 27;2021:3496807. doi: 10.1155/2021/3496807. eCollection 2021.
6
Scientists vs laypeople: How genetically modified food is discussed on a Chinese Q&A website.科学家与非专业人士:在中国问答网站上如何讨论转基因食品。
Public Underst Sci. 2019 Nov;28(8):991-1004. doi: 10.1177/0963662519876782. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
7
Safe Food Handling Advice Provided on Question-and-Answer Web Sites Is Inconsistent.问答网站提供的食品安全处理建议不一致。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2020 Jul;52(7):688-696. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2019.12.011. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
8
Vaccine information seeking on social Q&A services.疫苗信息在社交问答服务上的检索。
Vaccine. 2020 Mar 10;38(12):2691-2699. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.02.010. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
9
Willingness to Adopt Health Information Among Social Question-and-Answer Community Users in China: Cross-sectional Survey Study.中国人对健康信息的采纳意愿:来自社会问答社区用户的横断面调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 21;23(5):e27811. doi: 10.2196/27811.
10
Measuring sustainable tourism with online platform data.利用在线平台数据衡量可持续旅游业。
EPJ Data Sci. 2022;11(1):41. doi: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00354-6. Epub 2022 Jul 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Bridging and bonding: The roles of brokerage and closure in mobilizing support provision in online support groups.搭桥与联结:中介作用和封闭性在在线支持小组中调动支持提供方面的作用
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 10;20(6):e0325108. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325108. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Influence of intrinsic motivations on the continuity of scientific knowledge contribution to online knowledge-sharing platforms.内在动机对科学知识持续贡献到在线知识共享平台的影响。
Public Underst Sci. 2021 May;30(4):369-383. doi: 10.1177/0963662520970782. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
2
The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use.青少年福祉与数字技术使用之间的关系。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Feb;3(2):173-182. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0506-1. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
3
The Effect of Different Forms of Centering in Hierarchical Linear Models.
分层线性模型中不同形式中心化的效应
Multivariate Behav Res. 1995 Jan 1;30(1):1-21. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3001_1.
4
Origins of power-law degree distribution in the heterogeneity of human activity in social networks.社会网络中人类活动异质性的幂律度分布的起源。
Sci Rep. 2013;3:1783. doi: 10.1038/srep01783.
5
The Ortega Hypothesis: Citation analysis suggests that only a few scientists contribute to scientific progress.奥尔特加假说:引文分析表明只有少数科学家对科学进步做出贡献。
Science. 1972 Oct 27;178(4059):368-75. doi: 10.1126/science.178.4059.368.
6
Productive friction: how difficult business partnerships can accelerate innovation.富有成效的摩擦:艰难的商业伙伴关系如何加速创新。
Harv Bus Rev. 2005 Feb;83(2):82-91, 148.
7
Dementia and working memory.痴呆与工作记忆。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1986 Nov;38(4):603-18. doi: 10.1080/14640748608401616.