Faculty of Health Sciences, Libertas International University, Zagreb, Croatia.
Croatian Society for Quality Improvement in Healthcare, Croatian Medical Association, Zagreb, Croatia.
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 13;15(11):e0242065. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242065. eCollection 2020.
The aim of the study was to assess the reliability and construct validity of the Croatian translation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire-Ambulatory version (SAQ-AV) in the out-of-hours (OOH) primary care setting. A cross-sectional observational study using anonymous web-survey was carried out targeting a convenience sample of 358 health professionals working in the Croatian OOH primary care service. The final sample consisted of 185 questionnaires (response rate 51.7%). Psychometric properties were assessed using exploratory hierarchical factor analysis with Schmid-Leiman rotation to bifactor solution, McDonald's ω, and Cronbach's α. Five group factors were identified: Organization climate, Teamwork climate, Stress recognition, Ambulatory process of care, and Perceptions of workload. Items loading on the Stress recognition and Perceptions of workload factor had low loadings on the general factor. Cronbach's α ranged between 0.79 and 0.93. All items had corrected item-total correlation above 0.5. McDonalds' ω total for group factors ranged between 0.76 and 0.91. Values of ω general for factors Organization climate, Teamwork climate, and Ambulatory process of care ranged between 0.41 and 0.56. McDonalds' ω general for Stress recognition and Perceptions of workload were 0.13 and 0.16, respectively. Even though SAQ-AV may not be a reliable tool for international comparisons, subsets of items may be reliable tools in several national settings, including Croatia. Results confirmed that Stress recognition is not a dimension of patient safety culture, while Ambulatory process of care might be. Future studies should investigate the relationship of patient safety culture to treatment outcome.
本研究旨在评估克罗地亚语翻译的安全态度问卷-门诊版(SAQ-AV)在非工作时间(OOH)初级保健环境中的可靠性和结构有效性。采用横断面观察性研究,使用匿名网络调查,针对在克罗地亚 OOH 初级保健服务工作的 358 名卫生专业人员进行便利抽样。最终样本包括 185 份问卷(应答率为 51.7%)。使用探索性层次因子分析和 Schmid-Leiman 旋转进行双因素解,评估心理测量学特性,McDonald's ω 和 Cronbach's α。确定了五个组因素:组织氛围、团队合作氛围、压力识别、门诊护理流程和工作量感知。在压力识别和工作量感知因子上的项目负荷对一般因子的负荷较低。Cronbach's α 范围在 0.79 到 0.93 之间。所有项目的校正项目总分相关性均高于 0.5。组因素的 McDonalds' ω 总范围在 0.76 到 0.91 之间。组织氛围、团队合作氛围和门诊护理流程因子的一般 ω 值范围在 0.41 到 0.56 之间。压力识别和工作量感知因子的 McDonalds' ω 总分别为 0.13 和 0.16。尽管 SAQ-AV 可能不是国际比较的可靠工具,但在包括克罗地亚在内的几个国家环境中,项目子集可能是可靠的工具。结果证实,压力识别不是患者安全文化的一个维度,而门诊护理流程可能是。未来的研究应调查患者安全文化与治疗结果的关系。