School of Economics, University of Economics, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia; University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
J Environ Manage. 2021 Feb 1;279:111601. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111601. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
Literature has documented significant trade-offs between economic and environmental performance in many areas of agricultural production. However, while it has focused on the trade-off for technically efficient farms there are differing types of trade-offs that exist for differing types of farms. The present paper addresses these gaps in the literature by proposing a more generalised approach to analysing cost and environmental trade-offs. There is also a lack of research on the nature of the trade-off in coffee farming. This is especially so in Vietnam where there is both significant overuse of nutrients and increasing autonomous adaption through voluntary participation in sustainability certification schemes. The proposed framework is employed to investigate a data set of 679 Vietnamese coffee farms. This study delivers several important findings. First, the proposed approach indicates four distinct groups of farms facing differing types of trade-offs with some farms not facing any trade-offs. Second, empirical results show that the average levels of technical, cost and environmental efficiency are relatively low. Third, sustainability certified farms are found to perform better than non-certified farms although the differences in performance diminish over time. Overall, the empirical results favour a heterogeneous and more integrated policy approach to improving the technical, cost and environmental efficiency of coffee farmers in Vietnam.
文献记录表明,在农业生产的许多领域,经济和环境绩效之间存在着显著的权衡取舍。然而,尽管它关注的是技术上有效的农场的权衡取舍,但对于不同类型的农场,存在着不同类型的权衡取舍。本文通过提出一种更通用的方法来分析成本和环境权衡取舍,弥补了文献中的这些空白。咖啡种植中的权衡取舍的性质也缺乏研究。在越南尤其如此,那里存在着严重的养分过度使用问题,并且越来越多地通过自愿参与可持续性认证计划来自主适应。拟议的框架被用于调查 679 个越南咖啡农场的数据集。本研究有几个重要发现。首先,所提出的方法表明,面临不同类型权衡取舍的农场有四个不同的群体,其中一些农场没有面临任何权衡取舍。其次,实证结果表明,技术、成本和环境效率的平均水平相对较低。第三,虽然认证农场的绩效随着时间的推移而趋同,但可持续认证农场的表现优于非认证农场。总的来说,实证结果支持采取一种异质的、更综合的政策方法,以提高越南咖啡种植者的技术、成本和环境效率。