• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非 ICU 患者脓毒症结局的糖尿病:一项队列研究和文献复习。

Diabetes on sepsis outcomes in non-ICU patients: A cohort study and review of the literature.

机构信息

Dept of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Patras, Greece.

Nafpaktos Primary Care Unit, Nafpaktos, Greece.

出版信息

J Diabetes Complications. 2021 Jan;35(1):107765. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2020.107765. Epub 2020 Oct 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2020.107765
PMID:33187869
Abstract

AIMS

We sought to determine whether primary outcomes differ between non-ICU septic patients with and without type 2 diabetes (T2D).

METHODS

This study utilized the Hellenic Sepsis Study Group Registry, collecting nationwide data for sepsis patients since 2006, and classified patients upon presence or absence of T2D. Patients were perfectly matched for a) Sepsis 3 definition criteria (including septic shock) b) gender, c) age, d) APACHE II score and e) Charlson's comorbidity index (CCI). Independent sample t-test and chi-square t-test was used to compare prognostic indices and primary outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 4320 initially included non-ICU sepsis patients, 812 were finally analysed, following match on criteria. Baseline characteristics were age 76 [±10.3] years, 46% male, APACHE II 15.5 [±6], CCI 5.1 [±1.8], 24% infection, 63.8% sepsis and 12.2% septic shock. No significant difference was noted between two groups in qSOFA, SOFA, or suPAR1 levels (p = 0.7, 0.1 & 0.3) respectively. Primary sepsis syndrome resolved in 70.9% of cases (p = 0.9), while mortality was 24% in 28-days time. Cause of death was similar between patients with and without T2D (sepsis 17.8% vs 15.8%, heart event 3.7% vs 3.2%, CNS event 0.5% vs 0.5%, malignancy 0.7% vs 2% respectively, p = 0.6).

CONCLUSIONS

DM does not appear to negatively affect outcomes in septic patients not requiring ICU.

摘要

目的

我们旨在确定患有 2 型糖尿病(T2D)与不患有 T2D 的非 ICU 脓毒症患者的主要结局是否存在差异。

方法

本研究利用希腊脓毒症研究组注册中心,自 2006 年起收集全国脓毒症患者的数据,并根据是否存在 T2D 对患者进行分类。患者根据以下标准进行完全匹配:a)Sepsis 3 定义标准(包括感染性休克)b)性别、c)年龄、d)APACHE II 评分和 e)Charlson 合并症指数(CCI)。采用独立样本 t 检验和卡方检验比较预后指标和主要结局。

结果

在最初纳入的 4320 例非 ICU 脓毒症患者中,最终有 812 例患者符合纳入标准并进行了分析。患者的基线特征为年龄 76 [±10.3] 岁,46%为男性,APACHE II 评分为 15.5 [±6],CCI 为 5.1 [±1.8],24%有感染,63.8%为脓毒症,12.2%为感染性休克。两组间 qSOFA、SOFA 或 suPAR1 水平无显著差异(p 值分别为 0.7、0.1 和 0.3)。70.9%的患者主要脓毒症综合征得到缓解(p 值=0.9),28 天死亡率为 24%。患有 T2D 与不患有 T2D 的患者的死亡原因相似(脓毒症分别为 17.8%和 15.8%,心脏事件分别为 3.7%和 3.2%,中枢神经系统事件分别为 0.5%和 0.5%,恶性肿瘤分别为 0.7%和 2%,p 值=0.6)。

结论

在不需要 ICU 治疗的脓毒症患者中,糖尿病似乎不会对结局产生负面影响。

相似文献

1
Diabetes on sepsis outcomes in non-ICU patients: A cohort study and review of the literature.非 ICU 患者脓毒症结局的糖尿病:一项队列研究和文献复习。
J Diabetes Complications. 2021 Jan;35(1):107765. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2020.107765. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
2
[Combined prognostic value of serum lactic acid, procalcitonin and severity score for short-term prognosis of septic shock patients].[血清乳酸、降钙素原及严重程度评分对脓毒症休克患者短期预后的联合预测价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Mar;33(3):281-285. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20201113-00715.
3
[Intestinal barrier dysfunction and its related factors in patients with sepsis].[脓毒症患者的肠道屏障功能障碍及其相关因素]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016 Nov 29;96(44):3568-3572. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2016.44.007.
4
[Lactic acid, lactate clearance and procalcitonin in assessing the severity and predicting prognosis in sepsis].[乳酸、乳酸清除率及降钙素原在评估脓毒症严重程度及预测预后中的作用]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Apr;32(4):449-453. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200129-00086.
5
N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and cardiac troponin I for the prognostic utility in elderly patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in intensive care unit: A retrospective study.N末端前脑钠肽和心肌肌钙蛋白I在重症监护病房老年严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者中的预后价值:一项回顾性研究
J Crit Care. 2015 Jun;30(3):654.e9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.12.008. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
6
The influence of a change in septic shock definitions on intensive care epidemiology and outcome: comparison of sepsis-2 and sepsis-3 definitions.脓毒症休克定义的改变对重症监护流行病学和结局的影响:脓毒症 2 期和脓毒症 3 期定义的比较。
Infect Dis (Lond). 2018 Mar;50(3):207-213. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2017.1383630. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
7
[Predictive value of glycemic variability within 6 hours on the short-term prognosis of patients with septic shock].[脓毒性休克患者6小时内血糖变异性对短期预后的预测价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Jan;33(1):28-32. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200410-00274.
8
[Clinical significance on serum intestinal fatty acid binding protein and D-lactic acid levels in early intestinal injury of patients with sepsis].[血清肠脂肪酸结合蛋白和D-乳酸水平在脓毒症患者早期肠道损伤中的临床意义]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 May;31(5):545-550. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.05.005.
9
[A multicenter confirmatory study about precision and practicability of Sepsis-3].关于脓毒症-3(Sepsis-3)精准度与实用性的多中心验证性研究
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2017 Feb;29(2):99-105. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2017.02.002.
10
[Risk factors of early septic shock-related thrombocytopenia and its impact on prognosis].[早期脓毒性休克相关血小板减少症的危险因素及其对预后的影响]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Aug;33(8):938-943. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20210112-00036.

引用本文的文献

1
A Review on Risk Factors, Traditional Diagnostic Techniques, and Biomarkers for Pneumonia Prognostication and Management in Diabetic Patients.糖尿病患者肺炎预后与管理的危险因素、传统诊断技术及生物标志物综述
Diseases. 2024 Dec 2;12(12):310. doi: 10.3390/diseases12120310.
2
Preexisting Diabetes Mellitus and All-Cause Mortality in Adult Patients With Sepsis: A Population-Based Cohort Study.成人脓毒症患者的预先存在的糖尿病与全因死亡率:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Crit Care Explor. 2024 May 6;6(5):e1085. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001085. eCollection 2024 May 1.
3
Effect of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio on prognosis of elderly patients with severe sepsis combined with diabetes mellitus.
中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值对老年严重脓毒症合并糖尿病患者预后的影响。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Feb 29;24(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04757-0.
4
Clinical significance of platelet mononuclear cell aggregates in patients with sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome.血小板单核细胞聚集体在脓毒症和急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者中的临床意义
World J Clin Cases. 2024 Feb 16;12(5):966-972. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i5.966.
5
Prevalent diabetes and long-term cardiovascular outcomes in adult sepsis survivors: a population-based cohort study.成年脓毒症幸存者中常见的糖尿病与长期心血管结局:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Crit Care. 2023 Jul 31;27(1):302. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04586-4.
6
COVID-19 Outcomes and Diabetes Mellitus: A Comprehensive Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.2019冠状病毒病的转归与糖尿病:一项多中心前瞻性队列综合研究
Microorganisms. 2023 May 27;11(6):1416. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11061416.
7
Insight on Infections in Diabetic Setting.糖尿病环境下感染的见解
Biomedicines. 2023 Mar 21;11(3):971. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11030971.
8
The Value of Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio Combined with Red Blood Cell Distribution Width in Evaluating the Prognosis of Emergency Patients with Sepsis.中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值联合红细胞分布宽度在评估脓毒症急诊患者预后中的价值
Emerg Med Int. 2022 Nov 10;2022:1673572. doi: 10.1155/2022/1673572. eCollection 2022.
9
Impact of diabetes mellitus on outcomes of patients with sepsis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.糖尿病对脓毒症患者预后的影响:一项更新的系统评价与荟萃分析
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2022 Mar 5;14(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13098-022-00803-2.