Melbourne Dementia Research Centre, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia.
Ageing Res Rev. 2021 Jan;65:101212. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2020.101212. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
Alzheimer's disease (AD) stands out as a major disease without any form of preventative or disease modifying therapy. This is not for lack of trying. 33 phase 3 clinical trials of drugs targeting amyloid beta (Aβ) have failed to slow cognitive decline in AD. The field is at a cross-roads about whether to continue anti-Aβ therapy or more actively pursue alternative targets. With the burden of this disease to patients, families, and healthcare budgets growing yearly, the need for disease modifying AD therapies has become one of the highest priorities in all of medicine. While pathology, genetic and biochemical data offer a popular narrative for the causative role of Aβ, there are alternative explanations, and dissenting findings that, now more than ever, warrant thorough reanalysis. This review questions the major assumptions about Aβ on which therapies for AD were premised, and invites renewed interrogation into AD pathogenesis.
阿尔茨海默病(AD)是一种没有任何形式的预防或疾病修正治疗方法的主要疾病。这并不是因为缺乏尝试。针对淀粉样蛋白β(Aβ)的 33 项 3 期临床试验未能减缓 AD 的认知能力下降。该领域正处于十字路口,不知道是继续抗 Aβ治疗,还是更积极地寻求替代靶标。由于这种疾病给患者、家庭和医疗保健预算带来的负担逐年增加,因此,需要对具有疾病修正作用的 AD 疗法进行研究,这已成为所有医学领域的最高优先事项之一。虽然病理学、遗传学和生物化学数据为 Aβ 的致病作用提供了一个流行的解释,但也有其他解释和不同的发现,现在比以往任何时候都更需要进行彻底的重新分析。这篇综述对 AD 治疗所依据的关于 Aβ的主要假设提出了质疑,并邀请对 AD 的发病机制进行重新审查。