Cinalli David A, Cohen Sarah J, Guthrie Kathleen, Stackman Robert W
Jupiter Life Science Initiative, Charles E. Schmidt College of Science, Florida Atlantic University, Jupiter, FL, United States.
Department of Psychology, Charles E. Schmidt College of Science, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, United States.
Front Mol Neurosci. 2020 Oct 22;13:527543. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2020.527543. eCollection 2020.
While the essential contribution of the hippocampus to spatial memory is well established, object recognition memory has been traditionally attributed to the perirhinal cortex (PRh). However, the results of several studies indicate that under specific procedural conditions, temporary or permanent lesions of the hippocampus affect object memory processes as measured in the Spontaneous Object Recognition (SOR) task. The PRh and hippocampus are considered to contribute distinctly to object recognition memory based on memory strength. Allowing mice more, or less, exploration of novel objects during the encoding phase of the task (i.e., sample session), yields stronger, or weaker, object memory, respectively. The current studies employed temporary local inactivation and immunohistochemistry to determine the differential contributions of neuronal activity in PRh and the CA1 region of the hippocampus to strong and weak object memory. Temporary inactivation of the CA1 immediately after the SOR sample session impaired strong object memory but spared weak object memory; while temporary inactivation of PRh post-sample impaired weak object memory but spared strong object memory. Furthermore, mRNA transcription and protein synthesis are required for the consolidation of episodic memory, and activation patterns of immediate early genes (IEGs), such as c-Fos and Arc, are linked to behaviorally triggered neuronal activation and synaptic plasticity. Analyses of c-Fos and Arc protein expression in PRh and CA1 neurons by immunohistochemistry, and of Arc mRNA by qPCR after distinct stages of SOR, provide additional support that strong object memory is dependent on CA1 neuronal activity, while weak object memory is dependent on PRh neuronal activity. Taken together, the results support the view that both PRh and CA1 are required for object memory under distinct conditions. Specifically, our results are consistent with a model that as the mouse begins to explore a novel object, information about it accumulates within PRh, and a weak memory of the object is encoded. If object exploration continues beyond some threshold, strong memory for the event of object exploration is encoded; the consolidation of which is CA1-dependent. These data serve to reconcile the dissension in the literature by demonstrating functional and complementary roles for CA1 and PRh neurons in rodent object memory.
虽然海马体对空间记忆的重要贡献已得到充分证实,但传统上认为物体识别记忆归因于内嗅皮质(PRh)。然而,多项研究结果表明,在特定的程序条件下,海马体的临时或永久性损伤会影响自发物体识别(SOR)任务中所测量的物体记忆过程。基于记忆强度,PRh和海马体被认为对物体识别记忆有不同的贡献。在任务的编码阶段(即样本阶段)让小鼠更多或更少地探索新物体,分别会产生更强或更弱的物体记忆。当前的研究采用临时局部失活和免疫组织化学方法,以确定PRh和海马体CA1区域的神经元活动对强和弱物体记忆的不同贡献。SOR样本阶段后立即对CA1进行临时失活会损害强物体记忆,但不影响弱物体记忆;而样本后对PRh进行临时失活会损害弱物体记忆,但不影响强物体记忆。此外,情景记忆的巩固需要mRNA转录和蛋白质合成,并且即时早期基因(IEG)如c-Fos和Arc的激活模式与行为触发的神经元激活和突触可塑性相关。通过免疫组织化学分析PRh和CA1神经元中c-Fos和Arc蛋白的表达,并在SOR的不同阶段后通过qPCR分析Arc mRNA,进一步支持了强物体记忆依赖于CA1神经元活动,而弱物体记忆依赖于PRh神经元活动的观点。综上所述,这些结果支持了这样一种观点,即在不同条件下,PRh和CA1对于物体记忆都是必需的。具体而言,我们的结果与一个模型一致,即当小鼠开始探索一个新物体时,关于它的信息在PRh内积累,并且对该物体的弱记忆被编码。如果物体探索持续超过某个阈值,对物体探索事件的强记忆就会被编码;其巩固依赖于CA1。这些数据通过证明CA1和PRh神经元在啮齿动物物体记忆中的功能和互补作用,有助于调和文献中的分歧。