• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

科学合作、研究资金与科学知识的新颖性。

Scientific collaboration, research funding, and novelty in scientific knowledge.

机构信息

Spatial Dynamics Lab, School of Architecture, Planning & Environmental Policy, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

School of Applied Artificial Intelligence, Handong Global University, Pohang, South Korea.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Jul 25;17(7):e0271678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271678. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0271678
PMID:35877773
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9312390/
Abstract

Disruptive advancements in science and technology often rely on new ideas and findings, which in turn brings us to focus on the value of novelty in scholarly activities. Using Web of Science publication data from European regions for the period between 2008 and 2017, this study examines, first, the impact of scientific collaboration on novelty of research. Here, five levels of collaboration are considered for each article-country, three levels of regions, and institutions, and novelty is measured with keywords information. Second, we investigate both the effect and moderating effect of research funding on novelty. Our findings show that there is a negative and significant relationship between scientific collaboration and novelty. Furthermore, funded papers show lower novelty than the unfunded, but funding does have a significant moderating effect on the relationship between collaboration and novelty. This study contributes by linking diverse levels of collaboration and funding sources to article's novelty and thus extending the scope of bibliometric research of publications.

摘要

科学技术的颠覆性进步往往依赖于新思想和新发现,这反过来又使我们关注学术活动中新颖性的价值。本研究利用 2008 年至 2017 年欧洲地区的 Web of Science 出版物数据,首先考察了科学合作对研究新颖性的影响。在这里,我们为每篇文章-国家考虑了五个级别的合作,三个级别的地区和机构,并且使用关键词信息来衡量新颖性。其次,我们调查了研究资金对新颖性的影响和调节作用。我们的研究结果表明,科学合作与新颖性之间存在负相关关系。此外,与未获得资助的论文相比,获得资助的论文的新颖性较低,但资助对合作与新颖性之间的关系具有显著的调节作用。本研究通过将不同层次的合作和资金来源与文章的新颖性联系起来,从而扩展了出版物的文献计量研究范围,做出了贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa48/9312390/9b478785c813/pone.0271678.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa48/9312390/68a2e8e8a185/pone.0271678.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa48/9312390/4f77d273a699/pone.0271678.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa48/9312390/564c29bcebfe/pone.0271678.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa48/9312390/79f970696411/pone.0271678.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa48/9312390/483f733ed2cd/pone.0271678.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa48/9312390/9b478785c813/pone.0271678.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa48/9312390/68a2e8e8a185/pone.0271678.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa48/9312390/4f77d273a699/pone.0271678.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa48/9312390/564c29bcebfe/pone.0271678.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa48/9312390/79f970696411/pone.0271678.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa48/9312390/483f733ed2cd/pone.0271678.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa48/9312390/9b478785c813/pone.0271678.g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Scientific collaboration, research funding, and novelty in scientific knowledge.科学合作、研究资金与科学知识的新颖性。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 25;17(7):e0271678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271678. eCollection 2022.
2
Scholarly Productivity Evaluation of KL2 Scholars Using Bibliometrics and Federal Follow-on Funding: Cross-Institution Study.使用文献计量学和联邦后续资助评估 KL2 学者的学术产出:跨机构研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 29;23(9):e29239. doi: 10.2196/29239.
3
Conversational Interfaces for Health: Bibliometric Analysis of Grants, Publications, and Patents.健康领域的对话界面:资助、出版物及专利的文献计量分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Nov 18;21(11):e14672. doi: 10.2196/14672.
4
Bibliometry of biomedical scientific publications in Mauritania (Medline:1992-2016).毛里塔尼亚生物医学科学出版物的文献计量学(医学在线数据库:1992 - 2016年)
Tunis Med. 2018 Oct-Nov;96(10-11):834-843.
5
Use of Bibliometric Analysis to Assess the Scientific Productivity and Impact of the Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System Program, 2006-2012.运用文献计量分析评估全球新发传染病监测与应对系统项目(2006 - 2012年)的科研生产力与影响力
Mil Med. 2017 May;182(5):e1749-e1756. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00276.
6
Worldwide Scientific Research on Nanotechnology: A Bibliometric Analysis of Tendencies, Funding, and Challenges.世界范围内的纳米技术科学研究:趋势、资金和挑战的文献计量分析。
J Agric Food Chem. 2020 Aug 26;68(34):9158-9170. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c02141. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
7
A snapshot of pneumonia research activity and collaboration patterns (2001-2015): a global bibliometric analysis.肺炎研究活动和合作模式的快照(2001-2015):全球文献计量分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Sep 5;19(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0819-4.
8
Impact of the economic crisis on pain research: a bibliometric analysis of pain research publications from Ireland, Greece, and Portugal between 1997 and 2017.经济危机对疼痛研究的影响:1997年至2017年间爱尔兰、希腊和葡萄牙疼痛研究出版物的文献计量分析
Scand J Pain. 2018 Oct 25;18(4):629-637. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0092.
9
The Impact of Funding Insulin Research on Open Access Publishing: A 20-Years Bibliometric Analysis.资助胰岛素研究对开放获取出版的影响:一项20年的文献计量分析。
Curr Diabetes Rev. 2020;16(5):497-502. doi: 10.2174/1573399815666190712201635.
10
Analysis of Production, Impact, and Scientific Collaboration on Difficult Airway Through the Web of Science and Scopus (1981-2013).通过科学网和Scopus数据库对困难气道的研究产出、影响及科研合作情况分析(1981 - 2013年)
Anesth Analg. 2017 Jun;124(6):1886-1896. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002058.

引用本文的文献

1
Scientometric Study of Mpox and Vaccine Research: Dynamics, Emerging Patterns, and Networking.猴痘与疫苗研究的科学计量学研究:动态、新兴模式与网络
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 9;8(3):e70443. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70443. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Working in biocuration: contemporary experiences and perspectives.生物编目工作:当代经验与观点
Database (Oxford). 2025 Feb 12;2025. doi: 10.1093/database/baaf003.
3
Research priorities and trends in pulmonary tuberculosis in Latin America: A bibliometric analysis.拉丁美洲肺结核的研究重点与趋势:一项文献计量分析

本文引用的文献

1
Getting to the bottom of research funding: Acknowledging the complexity of funding dynamics.深入研究资金来源:承认资金动态的复杂性。
PLoS One. 2021 May 12;16(5):e0251488. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251488. eCollection 2021.
2
Exploring the changing geographical pattern of international scientific collaborations through the prism of cities.从城市视角探索国际科学合作的地理格局变化。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 16;15(11):e0242468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242468. eCollection 2020.
3
The Relative Influences of Government Funding and International Collaboration on Citation Impact.
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 18;10(15):e34828. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34828. eCollection 2024 Aug 15.
4
Challenges of biomedical research collaboration in India: Perceptions of Indian and international researchers.印度生物医学研究合作的挑战:印度和国际研究人员的看法。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 28;19(6):e0305159. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305159. eCollection 2024.
5
The landscape of biomedical research funding in Brazil: a current overview.巴西生物医学研究经费的全貌:当前概述。
Int Braz J Urol. 2024 Mar-Apr;50(2):209-222. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.9905.
政府资助与国际合作对引文影响力的相对影响
J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2019 Feb;70(2):198-201. doi: 10.1002/asi.24109. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
4
Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology.大团队推动科学技术发展,小团队则颠覆之。
Nature. 2019 Feb;566(7744):378-382. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0941-9. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
5
Mapping the global influence of published research on industry and innovation.描绘已发表研究对行业和创新的全球影响力。
Nat Biotechnol. 2018 Jan 10;36(1):31-39. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4049.
6
Open countries have strong science.开放的国家拥有强大的科学实力。
Nature. 2017 Oct 4;550(7674):32-33. doi: 10.1038/550032a.
7
The dual frontier: Patented inventions and prior scientific advance.双重前沿:专利发明与先前科学进展。
Science. 2017 Aug 11;357(6351):583-587. doi: 10.1126/science.aam9527.
8
Reviewers are blinkered by bibliometrics.评审人员被文献计量学所局限。
Nature. 2017 Apr 26;544(7651):411-412. doi: 10.1038/544411a.
9
The applied value of public investments in biomedical research.生物医药研究公共投资的应用价值。
Science. 2017 Apr 7;356(6333):78-81. doi: 10.1126/science.aal0010. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
10
The Continuing Growth of Global Cooperation Networks in Research: A Conundrum for National Governments.全球研究合作网络的持续增长:各国政府面临的难题
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 21;10(7):e0131816. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131816. eCollection 2015.