Suppr超能文献

在大型学术医疗中心使用右侧单侧超短脉冲电惊厥疗法继续急性病程治疗的比率。

Rate of continuing acute course treatment using right unilateral ultrabrief pulse electroconvulsive therapy at a large academic medical center.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, 32 Fruit Street, Yawkey 6A, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA.

出版信息

Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2021 Feb;271(1):191-197. doi: 10.1007/s00406-020-01202-2. Epub 2020 Nov 16.

Abstract

Right unilateral ultrabrief pulse (RUL-UBP) ECT has emerged as a promising technique for minimizing cognitive side effects of ECT while retaining clinical efficacy, but it is unknown how often patients will require alternative treatment parameters and at what point in the treatment course this occurs. To better define this problem, this study analyzes continuation in RUL-UBP ECT in a retrospective cohort of patients beginning acute course treatment. A single-center retrospective chart review was conducted of adult patients receiving a first lifetime course of ECT from 2010 to 2017 starting with RUL-UBP treatment parameters. 1793 patients met study criteria. Patients received a mean of 10.0 ± 3.2 ECT treatments, of which a mean of 8.4 ± 3.4 were RUL-UBP treatments; proportion using RUL-UBP through 12 treatments was 57.8%. In total, 65.6% of patients were treated with RUL-UPB ECT exclusively. Mean dose increased from 7.6 × seizure threshold at the second RUL-UBP treatment to 14.3 × seizure threshold at the twelfth RUL-UBP treatment. Rates of continuation in RUL-UBP ECT did not differ based on age or on primary diagnosis of major depression vs. bipolar disorder. Among patients beginning acute-course treatment using RUL-UPB ECT, two thirds were treated with these parameters exclusively. Among patients who received twelve RUL-UBP treatments, mean final dose was 14.3 × seizure threshold. Further studies regarding optimal dosing of RUL-UBP ECT are indicated.

摘要

右侧单侧超短脉冲 (RUL-UBP) ECT 已成为一种很有前途的技术,可以最大限度地减少 ECT 的认知副作用,同时保持临床疗效,但尚不清楚患者需要替代治疗参数的频率,以及在治疗过程中的哪个阶段会发生这种情况。为了更好地定义这个问题,本研究在开始急性疗程治疗的患者回顾性队列中分析了 RUL-UBP ECT 的延续性。对 2010 年至 2017 年期间接受首次终身 ECT 治疗的成年患者进行了一项单中心回顾性图表审查,这些患者均从 RUL-UBP 治疗参数开始治疗。符合研究标准的患者共有 1793 名。患者平均接受了 10.0±3.2 次 ECT 治疗,其中平均 8.4±3.4 次为 RUL-UBP 治疗;接受 12 次治疗中有 57.8%的患者使用了 RUL-UBP。总的来说,65.6%的患者完全接受了 RUL-UPB ECT 治疗。剂量平均从第二次 RUL-UBP 治疗的 7.6×癫痫发作阈值增加到第十二次 RUL-UBP 治疗的 14.3×癫痫发作阈值。RUL-UBP ECT 的延续率与年龄或原发性诊断(重度抑郁症与双相情感障碍)无关。在开始使用 RUL-UPB ECT 治疗急性疗程的患者中,有三分之二的患者完全接受了这些参数的治疗。在接受了 12 次 RUL-UBP 治疗的患者中,平均最终剂量为 14.3×癫痫发作阈值。需要进一步研究 RUL-UBP ECT 的最佳剂量。

相似文献

8
Brief vs. ultrabrief pulse ECT: focus on seizure quality.短脉冲与超短脉冲 ECT:关注痫性发作质量。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2018 Dec;268(8):831-838. doi: 10.1007/s00406-018-0925-z. Epub 2018 Jul 18.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Electroconvulsive Therapy Pulse Amplitude and Clinical Outcomes.电抽搐治疗脉冲幅度与临床结局。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021 Feb;29(2):166-178. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2020.06.008. Epub 2020 Jun 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验