Suppr超能文献

口吃的变异性:行为与影响。

Variability of Stuttering: Behavior and Impact.

机构信息

Department of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, Michigan State University, East Lansing.

出版信息

Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021 Jan 27;30(1):75-88. doi: 10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00112. Epub 2020 Nov 16.

Abstract

Purpose It has long been known that stuttering behaviors vary across time and situation. Preliminary evidence suggests that this variability negatively affects people who stutter and that stuttering behaviors are more variable than adverse impact associated with stuttering. More information is needed to determine how variability affects people who stutter and what the clinical and research implications of variability may be. Method Two hundred and four adults who stutter participated in a mixed-methods study exploring (a) how variability of stuttering affects people who stutter in comparison to other aspects of the condition and (b) which aspects of the overall experience of stuttering are variable. Results Analyses indicated that variability is very commonly experienced by people who stutter and that it is among the most frustrating aspects of the condition. Qualitative analyses revealed that variability is experienced in all aspects of the stuttering condition, including the observable behavior other affective, behavioral, and cognitive reactions; and the adverse impact of stuttering. Notable individual differences were found in terms of which specific aspects of the condition were more variable for different respondents. Overall, analyses revealed that the variability of different aspects of stuttering can be viewed in a hierarchy from most variable to least variable: aspects (e.g., frequency, duration), aspects (e.g., covert behaviors, physical tension), and experiences (e.g., negative thoughts, feelings, and self-image). Discussion These findings suggest that variability is a common and burdensome aspect of the experience of stuttering and underscore the importance of considering variability in stuttering behavior, reactions, and impact in research, assessment, and treatment for adults who stutter.

摘要

目的

长期以来,人们一直知道口吃行为会随时间和情况而变化。初步证据表明,这种可变性会对口吃者产生负面影响,而且口吃行为比与口吃相关的不利影响更具可变性。需要更多的信息来确定可变性如何影响口吃者,以及可变性可能具有哪些临床和研究意义。

方法

204 名口吃成年人参与了一项混合方法研究,旨在探索:(a) 口吃行为的可变性如何影响口吃者,与该病症的其他方面相比;(b) 口吃整体体验中哪些方面是可变的。

结果

分析表明,可变性是口吃者非常常见的体验,也是该病症最令人沮丧的方面之一。定性分析显示,可变性存在于口吃状况的所有方面,包括可观察到的行为以及其他情感、行为和认知反应;以及口吃的不利影响。在不同的受访者中,不同的条件方面具有更大的可变性,这存在显著的个体差异。总体而言,分析表明,口吃不同方面的可变性可以从最可变到最不可变的方面进行分层:方面(例如,频率、持续时间)、方面(例如,隐蔽行为、身体紧张)和方面(例如,负面想法、感觉和自我形象)。

讨论

这些发现表明,可变性是口吃体验的一个常见且负担沉重的方面,并强调了在研究、评估和治疗口吃成年人时,考虑口吃行为、反应和影响的可变性的重要性。

相似文献

1
Variability of Stuttering: Behavior and Impact.口吃的变异性:行为与影响。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021 Jan 27;30(1):75-88. doi: 10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00112. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
2
Group Experiences and Individual Differences in Stuttering.口吃的群体经验与个体差异。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Dec 12;62(12):4335-4350. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00138. Print 2019 Dec 18.
3
Recovery and Relapse: Perspectives From Adults Who Stutter.康复与复发:口吃成年人的观点
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Jul 20;63(7):2162-2176. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00010. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
5
Stuttering as Defined by Adults Who Stutter.口吃定义:口吃者的看法。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Dec 12;62(12):4356-4369. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00137. Print 2019 Dec 18.

引用本文的文献

4
Variability of Stuttering in Young Children: Caregivers' Perceptions and Experiences.幼儿口吃的变异性:照顾者的认知与经历
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2025 Jul 10;34(4):1992-2009. doi: 10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00341. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
6
Caregiver Predictions of Their 3- to 6-Year-Old Child Who Stutters' Communication Attitude.照顾者对其 3 至 6 岁口吃儿童沟通态度的预测。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 Jul 9;67(7):2086-2105. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00662. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
7
Knowns and unknowns about the neurobiology of stuttering.口吃的神经生物学:已知与未知。
PLoS Biol. 2024 Feb 22;22(2):e3002492. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002492. eCollection 2024 Feb.
9
Clinical and Psychosocial Predictors of Post-Event Processing in Adults Who Stutter.口吃成人事件后加工的临床和心理社会预测因素。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Nov 9;66(11):4259-4279. doi: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00245. Epub 2023 Oct 10.
10
Understanding the Broader Impact of Stuttering: Suicidal Ideation.理解口吃的更广泛影响:自杀意念。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Sep 11;32(5):2087-2110. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-23-00007. Epub 2023 Jul 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Recovery and Relapse: Perspectives From Adults Who Stutter.康复与复发:口吃成年人的观点
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Jul 20;63(7):2162-2176. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00010. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
2
The Speaker's Experience of Stuttering: Measuring Spontaneity.演讲者的口吃经历:自发性的测量。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Apr 27;63(4):983-1001. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00068. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
3
Repetitive Negative Thinking, Temperament, and Adverse Impact in Adults Who Stutter.重复性消极思维、气质与口吃成人的不良影响。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 Feb 7;29(1):201-215. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-00077. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
4
Group Experiences and Individual Differences in Stuttering.口吃的群体经验与个体差异。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Dec 12;62(12):4335-4350. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00138. Print 2019 Dec 18.
5
Stuttering as Defined by Adults Who Stutter.口吃定义:口吃者的看法。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Dec 12;62(12):4356-4369. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00137. Print 2019 Dec 18.
6
A Phenomenological Analysis of the Experience of Stuttering.口吃体验的现象学分析。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Oct 19;27(3S):1180-1194. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-ODC11-17-0192.
9
Rethinking covert stuttering.重新审视隐性口吃。
J Fluency Disord. 2017 Sep;53:26-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
10
How Stuttering Develops: The Multifactorial Dynamic Pathways Theory.口吃如何形成:多因素动态路径理论
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Sep 18;60(9):2483-2505. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-16-0343.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验