• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与 CrossFit 健身房中运动强度的偏好和耐受性相关的社会环境的网络分析。

Network Analysis of the Social Environment Relative to Preference for and Tolerance of Exercise Intensity in CrossFit Gyms.

机构信息

College of Education and Human Development, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA.

College of Health and Human Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 12;17(22):8370. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228370.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17228370
PMID:33198213
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7698103/
Abstract

Known for its ability to improve fitness and health, high-intensity functional training (HIFT) focuses on functional movements completed at high intensities, often yielding outcomes superior to repetitive aerobic workouts. Preference for and tolerance of high-intensity exercise are associated with enjoyment of and adherence to HIFT. Similarly, the social environment present within CrossFit, a popular group-based HIFT modality, is important to the enjoyment of and adherence to HIFT. This study aimed to test whether preference and tolerance were related to social connections within CrossFit networks. Linear network autocorrelation models (LNAMs) and exponential random graph models (ERGMs) were computed on sociometric and attribute data from members of three CrossFit networks (n = 197). LNAMs showed the preference and tolerance scores of someone's social connections were associated with their own in all three gyms, and ERGMs demonstrated preference and tolerance scores were associated with the presence of social ties within all networks. This study is the first to provide evidence for a relationship between social connections and preference and tolerance. Future longitudinal research is needed to determine if the social environment may influence and optimize a person's preference of and tolerance for HIFT.

摘要

高强度功能性训练(HIFT)以提高健康和健身水平而闻名,其专注于高强度完成的功能性运动,其结果通常优于重复性有氧运动。对高强度运动的偏好和耐受性与对 HIFT 的享受和坚持有关。同样,在流行的基于团体的 HIFT 模式 CrossFit 中,社交环境对于享受和坚持 HIFT 也很重要。本研究旨在测试偏好和耐受性是否与 CrossFit 网络中的社交关系有关。使用来自三个 CrossFit 网络的成员的社会计量学和属性数据,计算了线性网络自相关模型(LNAMs)和指数随机图模型(ERGMs)(n = 197)。LNAMs 表明,在所有三个健身房中,某人社交关系的偏好和耐受性得分与他们自己的偏好和耐受性得分有关,而 ERGMs 则表明,偏好和耐受性得分与网络内的社交关系存在有关。这项研究首次提供了社交关系与偏好和耐受性之间存在关系的证据。需要进行未来的纵向研究,以确定社交环境是否会影响和优化个人对 HIFT 的偏好和耐受性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20e0/7698103/3aa6f25a7d35/ijerph-17-08370-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20e0/7698103/3aa6f25a7d35/ijerph-17-08370-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20e0/7698103/3aa6f25a7d35/ijerph-17-08370-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Network Analysis of the Social Environment Relative to Preference for and Tolerance of Exercise Intensity in CrossFit Gyms.与 CrossFit 健身房中运动强度的偏好和耐受性相关的社会环境的网络分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 12;17(22):8370. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228370.
2
High-intensity compared to moderate-intensity training for exercise initiation, enjoyment, adherence, and intentions: an intervention study.高强度与中等强度训练对运动起始、愉悦感、依从性及意愿的影响:一项干预研究。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Aug 3;14:789. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-789.
3
I CrossFit; Do You? Cross-Sectional Peer Similarity of Physical Activity Behavior in a Group High Intensity Functional Training Setting.我进行 CrossFit;你呢?群体高强度功能性训练环境中身体活动行为的横断面同伴相似性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 19;19(9):4932. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19094932.
4
Is High-Intensity Functional Training (HIFT)/CrossFit Safe for Military Fitness Training?高强度功能性训练(HIFT)/CrossFit对军事体能训练安全吗?
Mil Med. 2016 Jul;181(7):627-37. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00273.
5
The Benefits of High-Intensity Functional Training Fitness Programs for Military Personnel.高强度功能性训练健身计划对军事人员的益处。
Mil Med. 2016 Nov;181(11):e1508-e1514. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00503.
6
The effects of high-intensity functional training on cardiometabolic risk factors and exercise enjoyment in men and women with metabolic syndrome: study protocol for a randomized, 12-week, dose-response trial.高强度功能性训练对代谢综合征男性和女性患者的心血代谢风险因素和运动愉悦感的影响:一项随机、12 周、剂量反应试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Mar 1;23(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06100-7.
7
Quantifying CrossFit: Potential solutions for monitoring multimodal workloads and identifying training targets.量化CrossFit:监测多模式工作量和确定训练目标的潜在解决方案。
Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Oct 14;4:949429. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.949429. eCollection 2022.
8
Acute physiological outcomes of high-intensity functional training: a scoping review.高强度功能性训练的急性生理结果:范围综述。
PeerJ. 2023 Jan 3;11:e14493. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14493. eCollection 2023.
9
A 4-Year Analysis of the Incidence of Injuries Among CrossFit-Trained Participants.对接受CrossFit训练的参与者受伤发生率的4年分析。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Oct 24;6(10):2325967118803100. doi: 10.1177/2325967118803100. eCollection 2018 Oct.
10
Physiological profile comparison between high intensity functional training, endurance and power athletes.高强度功能性训练、耐力和力量运动员的生理特征比较。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2022 Feb;122(2):531-539. doi: 10.1007/s00421-021-04858-3. Epub 2021 Dec 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Using Psychometric Testing Procedures for Scale Validity, Reliability, and Invariance Analysis: The PRETIE-Q Portuguese Version.使用心理测量测试程序进行量表效度、信度和不变性分析:PRETIE-Q葡萄牙语版本
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2023 Jun 23;13(7):1158-1172. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe13070086.
2
Physiological effects of regular CrossFit training and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic-A systematic review.常规CrossFit训练的生理效应及2019冠状病毒病大流行的影响——一项系统综述
Front Physiol. 2023 Apr 5;14:1146718. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1146718. eCollection 2023.
3
I CrossFit; Do You? Cross-Sectional Peer Similarity of Physical Activity Behavior in a Group High Intensity Functional Training Setting.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of Networks with Missing Data with Application to the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health.缺失数据网络分析及其在青少年健康全国纵向研究中的应用。
J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 2017 Apr;66(3):501-519. doi: 10.1111/rssc.12184. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
2
Network Effects on Adolescents' Perceived Barriers to Physical Activity.网络效应对青少年感知体力活动障碍的影响。
J Phys Act Health. 2020 Aug 12;17(9):889-894. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2019-0655.
3
Social networks, group exercise, and anxiety among college students.大学生社交网络、群体锻炼与焦虑。
我进行 CrossFit;你呢?群体高强度功能性训练环境中身体活动行为的横断面同伴相似性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 19;19(9):4932. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19094932.
J Am Coll Health. 2021 May-Jun;69(4):361-369. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2019.1679150. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
4
What predicts who we approach for social support? Tests of the attachment figure and strong ties hypotheses.什么因素决定了我们会向谁寻求社会支持?依恋对象和强关系假设的检验。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Mar;118(3):481-500. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000189. Epub 2019 May 9.
5
High-Intensity Functional Training (HIFT): Definition and Research Implications for Improved Fitness.高强度功能性训练(HIFT):改善体能的定义及研究意义
Sports (Basel). 2018 Aug 7;6(3):76. doi: 10.3390/sports6030076.
6
Changes in body composition, bone metabolism, strength, and skill-specific performance resulting from 16-weeks of HIFT.经过 16 周高强度间歇训练(HIFT),身体成分、骨代谢、力量和专项技能表现发生的变化。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 15;13(6):e0198324. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198324. eCollection 2018.
7
Social network analysis for assessing college-aged adults' health: A systematic review.社交网络分析在评估大学生健康中的应用:系统综述。
J Am Coll Health. 2019 Jan;67(1):59-67. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2018.1462820. Epub 2018 May 31.
8
What they say and what they do: comparing physical activity across the USA, England and the Netherlands.言行不一:比较美国、英国和荷兰的身体活动情况。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018 Jun;72(6):471-476. doi: 10.1136/jech-2017-209703. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
9
CrossFit Overview: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.CrossFit概述:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Sports Med Open. 2018 Feb 26;4(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40798-018-0124-5.
10
Exercise contagion in a global social network.全球社交网络中的锻炼传染现象。
Nat Commun. 2017 Apr 18;8:14753. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14753.