• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者和非正式照护者参与研究的框架(PAICPAIR):第 1 部分。

Framework for Patient and Informal Caregiver Participation in Research (PAICPAIR): Part 1.

机构信息

Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Elderly and Nursing Home Medicine, University of Bergen, Norway (Ms Staats and Drs Husebø and Tranvåg); Institute of Nursing and Health Promotion, Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway (Dr Grov); Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Women's Health, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Norway (Dr Tranvåg); and Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Norway (Dr Tranvåg).

出版信息

ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2020 Apr/Jun;43(2):E58-E70. doi: 10.1097/ANS.0000000000000289.

DOI:10.1097/ANS.0000000000000289
PMID:31688063
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7192540/
Abstract

The term user involvement is frequently applied in research. Frameworks for patient and informal caregiver participation as coresearchers in studies concerning patients with life-threatening illness are however sparse. The PhD project Dying With Dignity-Dignity-Preserving Care for Older Women Living at Home With Incurable Cancer has implemented a thorough cooperation with patients and informal caregivers from the early stages of the research process. A framework for Patient and Informal Caregiver Participation In Research (PAICPAIR) is suggested-creating a stronger foundation for democracy, equality, and research quality by also promoting active participation among vulnerable people experiencing incurable, life-threatening illness, as coresearchers.

摘要

“用户参与”一词在研究中经常被使用。然而,将患者和非正式护理人员作为核心研究人员参与到危及生命的疾病研究中的框架却很少。博士项目《有尊严地死亡-为在家中患有绝症的老年妇女提供尊严维持护理》从研究过程的早期阶段就与患者和非正式护理人员进行了全面合作。建议采用《患者和非正式护理人员参与研究框架》(PAICPAIR)-通过促进作为核心研究人员的处于绝症和危及生命的弱势人群的积极参与,为民主、平等和研究质量奠定更坚实的基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b29/7192540/59ac649959ec/ains-43-e58-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b29/7192540/59ac649959ec/ains-43-e58-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b29/7192540/59ac649959ec/ains-43-e58-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Framework for Patient and Informal Caregiver Participation in Research (PAICPAIR): Part 1.患者和非正式照护者参与研究的框架(PAICPAIR):第 1 部分。
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2020 Apr/Jun;43(2):E58-E70. doi: 10.1097/ANS.0000000000000289.
2
Framework for Patient and Informal Caregiver Participation in Research (PAICPAIR) Part 2.患者和非正式照护者参与研究的框架(PAICPAIR)第二部分。
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2024;47(2):188-201. doi: 10.1097/ANS.0000000000000474. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
3
'Death with dignity' - doubts and demands.“尊严死”——质疑与诉求。
Aust Nurs Midwifery J. 2013 Oct;21(4):26.
4
Interference Between Family Caregivers' Mental Disorders and Their Estimates of Quality of Dying and Death (QODD) of Their Loved Ones.家庭照顾者的精神障碍与其对所爱之人死亡质量和临终质量(QODD)的评估之间的干扰。
J Palliat Care. 2017 Jan;32(1):34-39. doi: 10.1177/0825859717711319.
5
Dignity of older home-dwelling women nearing end-of-life: Informal caregivers' perception.临终前居家老年女性的尊严:非正式照护者的看法。
Nurs Ethics. 2021 May;28(3):444-456. doi: 10.1177/0969733020956372. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
6
["Good dying"--definition and current state of research].["善终"——定义与研究现状]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2015 Aug;140(17):1296-301. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-102676. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
7
Dignity in dying.有尊严地离世。
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2019 Oct 2;25(10):471. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2019.25.10.471.
8
Autonomy and ars moriendi.自主性与善终之道
Neurology. 2007 Mar 27;68(13):1085-6; author reply 1086. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000260441.34374.a4.
9
Human Dignity, Narrative Integrity, and Ethical Decision Making at the End of Life. Proceedings of a symposium. St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. June 2004.
J Palliat Care. 2004 Autumn;20(3):131-216.
10
Positive and negative outcomes of informal caregiving at home and in institutionalised long-term care: a cross-sectional study.家庭及机构化长期护理中非正式照护的积极与消极结果:一项横断面研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Oct 10;17(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0620-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients' experiences with shared decision-making in home-based palliative care - navigation through major life decisions.患者在居家姑息治疗中共同决策的体验 - 重大生活决策的导航。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Apr 17;23(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01434-2.
2
Patient and public involvement in Nordic healthcare research: a scoping review of contemporary practice.患者及公众参与北欧医疗保健研究:当代实践的范围综述
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Aug 30;9(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00490-x.
3
Conceptualization and content validation of the MEDication literacy assessment of geriatric patients and informal caregivers (MED-fLAG).
老年患者及非正式照护者药物治疗素养评估(MED-fLAG)的概念化与内容验证
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2022 Aug 19;6(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s41687-022-00495-2.
4
The compound role of a coordinator for home-dwelling persons with dementia and their informal caregivers: qualitative study.痴呆居家患者及其非专业照护者的协调人复合角色:定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 16;20(1):1045. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05913-z.
5
Dignity of older home-dwelling women nearing end-of-life: Informal caregivers' perception.临终前居家老年女性的尊严:非正式照护者的看法。
Nurs Ethics. 2021 May;28(3):444-456. doi: 10.1177/0969733020956372. Epub 2020 Oct 28.