Suppr超能文献

股神经阻滞联合其他镇痛方法用于全膝关节置换术后镇痛的疗效:一项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照研究。

Efficacy of Adductor Canal Block Combined With Additional Analgesic Methods for Postoperative Analgesia in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.

Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2020 Dec;35(12):3554-3562. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.06.060. Epub 2020 Jun 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of adductor canal block (ACB) combined with additional analgesic methods in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and investigate whether blocking the sensory nerves that are distributed in the posterior and lateral aspect of knee could improve postoperative pain control.

METHODS

Two hundred scheduled patients for TKA were randomly allocated into 4 groups: Group A received ACB combined with iPACK (interspace between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee) block and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block (LFCNB); Group B received ACB combined with iPACK block; Group C received ACB combined with LFCNB; and Group D received ACB only. Postoperative pain score was the main primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the morphine consumption and analgesic duration. Other outcomes included knee range of motion, quadriceps strength, ambulation, Knee Society Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index physical function, timed up and go (TUG) test, and complications.

RESULTS

Groups A, B, and C had lower postoperative pain scores within 12 hours at rest and 8 hours with activity than Group D (P < .05). In addition, Group A had lower morphine consumption than both Group C (P < .05) and Group D (P < .01). Group A had the longest analgesic duration (19.21 ± 3.22 hours) among all groups. There were no significant differences among the groups in terms of mobility and complication after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Combining ACB with both iPACK and LFCNB is an effective method for decreasing early postoperative pain in TKA without increasing the complications or affecting the early rehabilitation.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估收肌管阻滞(ACB)联合其他镇痛方法在全膝关节置换术(TKA)中的疗效,并探讨阻滞分布于膝关节后侧和外侧的感觉神经是否能改善术后疼痛控制。

方法

将 200 例拟行 TKA 的患者随机分为 4 组:A 组接受 ACB 联合 iPACK(股动脉和膝关节囊间隙)阻滞和股外侧皮神经阻滞(LFCNB);B 组接受 ACB 联合 iPACK 阻滞;C 组接受 ACB 联合 LFCNB;D 组仅接受 ACB。术后疼痛评分是主要的主要结局。次要结局包括吗啡消耗量和镇痛持续时间。其他结局包括膝关节活动度、股四头肌力量、活动能力、膝关节学会评分、安大略西部和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数躯体功能、计时起立行走(TUG)测试和并发症。

结果

A、B 和 C 组在静息时和活动后 8 小时内的术后 12 小时内疼痛评分均低于 D 组(P<.05)。此外,A 组的吗啡消耗量低于 C 组(P<.05)和 D 组(P<.01)。A 组的镇痛持续时间最长(19.21±3.22 小时)。术后各组在活动能力和并发症方面无显著差异。

结论

ACB 联合 iPACK 和 LFCNB 是一种有效降低 TKA 术后早期疼痛的方法,不会增加并发症或影响早期康复。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验