Shorey Shefaly, Ng Esperanza Debby
Alice Lee Center for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Level 2, Clinical Research Centre, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, Singapore 117597, Singapore.
Alice Lee Center for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Level 2, Clinical Research Centre, Block MD11, 10 Medical Drive, Singapore 117597, Singapore.
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Mar;98:104662. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104662. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
Due to technological advancements and the current generation being more tech-savvy, the use of virtual worlds in nursing education and clinical practice is increasingly popular. We performed a systematic review on randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies to examine the current evidence on the use of virtual worlds as a teaching tool and to ascertain the outcomes measured.
Systematic review of randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies.
Six electronic databases (PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and ProQuest) were searched by title and abstract from each database's date of inception to December 2019.
The Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical Appraisal Tool was used to conduct critical appraisal of the selected articles.
Eighteen studies were included in the narrative summary. Studies were mostly conducted in developed countries and focused on nursing students. Advantages of virtual worlds include higher time-cost-effectiveness as compared to mannequin-based simulations and face-to-face lectures. Two major disadvantages were technological issues and the lack of realism.
Among the three learning outcomes (skills-based, cognitive, and affective), virtual worlds are the most effective in improving cognitive outcomes such as theoretical knowledge. This suggests that virtual worlds may be used as an alternative or complementary method to teach theoretical knowledge in nursing education.
由于技术进步以及当代人对技术更为精通,虚拟世界在护理教育和临床实践中的应用越来越普遍。我们对随机对照试验和准实验研究进行了系统评价,以检验关于使用虚拟世界作为教学工具的现有证据,并确定所测量的结果。
对随机对照试验和准实验研究的系统评价。
通过标题和摘要检索了六个电子数据库(PubMed、护理及相关健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)、Embase、PsycINFO、科学引文索引和ProQuest),检索时间范围为每个数据库创建之日至2019年12月。
使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的批判性评价工具对所选文章进行批判性评价。
叙述性总结纳入了18项研究。研究大多在发达国家进行,且主要针对护理专业学生。与基于人体模型的模拟和面对面讲座相比,虚拟世界的优势包括更高的时间成本效益。两个主要缺点是技术问题和缺乏真实感。
在三种学习成果(基于技能的、认知的和情感的)中,虚拟世界在改善认知成果(如理论知识)方面最为有效。这表明虚拟世界可作为护理教育中教授理论知识的替代方法或补充方法。