• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对传统脊髓刺激(SCS)治疗失败的患者进行挽救性10kHz脊髓刺激(SCS)的回顾性评估:救援研究。

Retrospective Assessment of Salvage to 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) in Patients Who Failed Traditional SCS Therapy: RESCUE Study.

作者信息

Kapural Leonardo, Sayed Dawood, Kim Brian, Harstroem Caroline, Deering James

机构信息

Carolinas Pain Institute, Winston-Salem, NC 27103, USA.

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2020 Nov 10;13:2861-2867. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S281749. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.2147/JPR.S281749
PMID:33204147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7667504/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

A randomized clinical trial demonstrated that 10 kHz SCS (10kHz-SCS) therapy is superior to traditional low-frequency SCS (LF-SCS) at 12- and 24-month clinical follow-ups and led to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the therapy. The results of the study led our practices to trial 10kHz-SCS in patients who had not maintained pain relief with LF-SCS therapy. Here, we report a large set of data from two clinical sites to assess if 10kHz-SCS is an effective salvage modality when LF-SCS fails.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of 120 patients across two clinical sites who had LF-SCS implants and were salvaged with 10kHz-SCS.

RESULTS

Data were analyzed from 105 patients between 28 and 90 years old (median 60) with chronic pain for 13.6 years. The mean duration of LF-SCS therapy was 4.66±3.9 years. The average Visual Analog Scale (VAS) decreased from 8.30±1.4 (median of 8) cm to 3.32±2.0 (median of 3) cm at 12 months and 3.36±2.0 (median of 3) cm at the most recent clinic visit (p<0.001) following salvage therapy. Pain relief of 50% or more was obtained in 85 out of 105 (81%) patients. Opioid usage decreased from 60.3±77.1 mg to 32.1±44.0 mg MSO4 equivalents (p = 0.001) at 12 months after salvage therapy.

CONCLUSION

Eighty-one percent of patient cases reviewed, where LF-SCS had failed, achieved >50% pain relief with 10kHz-SCS, and almost all exhibited some clinical improvement. Therefore, 10kHz-SCS should be considered an appropriate option to rescue failed LF-SCS.

摘要

背景与目的

一项随机临床试验表明,在12个月和24个月的临床随访中,10千赫兹脊髓刺激疗法(10kHz-SCS)优于传统低频脊髓刺激疗法(LF-SCS),并促使美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准了该疗法。该研究结果促使我们的医疗团队在那些接受LF-SCS治疗后疼痛未得到缓解的患者中试用10kHz-SCS。在此,我们报告来自两个临床地点的大量数据,以评估当LF-SCS失败时,10kHz-SCS是否为一种有效的挽救治疗方式。

方法

我们对两个临床地点的120例植入了LF-SCS并接受10kHz-SCS挽救治疗的患者进行了回顾性病历审查。

结果

分析了105例年龄在28至90岁(中位数60岁)、患有慢性疼痛13.6年的患者的数据。LF-SCS治疗的平均持续时间为4.66±3.9年。在挽救治疗后的12个月时,平均视觉模拟评分(VAS)从8.30±1.4(中位数8)厘米降至3.32±2.0(中位数3)厘米,在最近一次门诊就诊时降至3.36±2.0(中位数3)厘米(p<0.001)。105例患者中有85例(81%)疼痛缓解达50%或更多。在挽救治疗后12个月,阿片类药物的使用量从60.3±77.1毫克降至32.1±44.0毫克硫酸吗啡当量(p = 0.001)。

结论

在回顾的患者病例中,81%的患者在LF-SCS治疗失败后,通过10kHz-SCS实现了>50%的疼痛缓解,并且几乎所有患者都有一定的临床改善。因此,10kHz-SCS应被视为挽救失败的LF-SCS的合适选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5394/7667504/3e64e8891c44/JPR-13-2861-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5394/7667504/77d724f51306/JPR-13-2861-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5394/7667504/a42eaca62cc7/JPR-13-2861-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5394/7667504/1b0c1e19f565/JPR-13-2861-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5394/7667504/3e64e8891c44/JPR-13-2861-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5394/7667504/77d724f51306/JPR-13-2861-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5394/7667504/a42eaca62cc7/JPR-13-2861-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5394/7667504/1b0c1e19f565/JPR-13-2861-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5394/7667504/3e64e8891c44/JPR-13-2861-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Retrospective Assessment of Salvage to 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) in Patients Who Failed Traditional SCS Therapy: RESCUE Study.对传统脊髓刺激(SCS)治疗失败的患者进行挽救性10kHz脊髓刺激(SCS)的回顾性评估:救援研究。
J Pain Res. 2020 Nov 10;13:2861-2867. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S281749. eCollection 2020.
2
Retrospective Efficacy and Cost-Containment Assessment of 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) in Non-Surgical Refractory Back Pain Patients.非手术难治性背痛患者10kHz脊髓刺激(SCS)的回顾性疗效及成本控制评估
J Pain Res. 2022 Nov 16;15:3589-3595. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S373873. eCollection 2022.
3
High-frequency (10 kHz) spinal cord stimulation (SCS) as a salvage therapy for failed traditional SCS: A narrative review of the available evidence.高频(10千赫)脊髓刺激(SCS)作为传统SCS失败后的挽救疗法:现有证据的叙述性综述
Pain Pract. 2023 Mar;23(3):301-312. doi: 10.1111/papr.13184. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
4
Utilizing 10kHz Stimulation to Salvage a Failed Low Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation Trial.利用10kHz刺激挽救失败的低频脊髓刺激试验。
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2023 Jan 28;15:57624. doi: 10.52965/001c.57624. eCollection 2023.
5
Comparison of 10-kHz High-Frequency and Traditional Low-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Back and Leg Pain: 24-Month Results From a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Pivotal Trial.10千赫高频与传统低频脊髓刺激治疗慢性腰腿痛的比较:一项多中心、随机、对照关键试验的24个月结果
Neurosurgery. 2016 Nov;79(5):667-677. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001418.
6
Demographics and PainDETECT as Predictors of 24-Month Outcomes for 10 kHz SCS in Nonsurgical Refractory Back Pain.人口统计学和疼痛 DETECT 作为 10 kHz SCS 治疗非手术难治性腰痛 24 个月结局的预测因素。
Pain Physician. 2024 Mar;27(3):129-139.
7
Sex-specific differences in the efficacy of traditional low frequency versus high frequency spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain.传统低频与高频脊髓刺激治疗慢性疼痛疗效的性别差异。
Bioelectron Med. 2022 Apr 28;8(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s42234-022-00090-2.
8
Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation as a Salvage Therapy Following Failed Spinal Cord Stimulation.脊髓刺激失败后,背根神经节刺激作为一种挽救疗法。
Neuromodulation. 2022 Oct;25(7):1024-1032. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.04.050. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
9
High Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation at 10 kHz for the Treatment of Chronic Pain: 6-Month Australian Clinical Experience.10千赫兹高频脊髓刺激治疗慢性疼痛:澳大利亚6个月临床经验
Pain Physician. 2016 May;19(4):267-80.
10
The Evolving Role of High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation as Salvage Therapy in Neurostimulation.高频脊髓刺激在神经刺激中的挽救治疗作用不断演变。
Pain Pract. 2020 Sep;20(7):706-713. doi: 10.1111/papr.12898. Epub 2020 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
10 kHz spinal cord stimulation vs. traditional low-frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of diabetes peripheral neuropathic pain: study protocol for a multi-center randomized controlled clinical trial.10千赫兹脊髓刺激与传统低频脊髓刺激治疗糖尿病周围神经病理性疼痛的多中心随机对照临床试验研究方案
Front Neurol. 2025 Jun 4;16:1611970. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1611970. eCollection 2025.
2
Neuromodulation and Habituation: A Literature Review and Conceptional Analysis of Sustaining Therapeutic Efficacy and Mitigating Habituation.神经调节与习惯化:关于维持治疗效果及减轻习惯化的文献综述与概念分析
Biomedicines. 2024 Apr 23;12(5):930. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12050930.
3

本文引用的文献

1
10 kHz spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of non-surgical refractory back pain: subanalysis of pooled data from two prospective studies.10 kHz 脊髓刺激治疗非手术难治性背痛:两项前瞻性研究汇总数据的亚组分析。
Anaesthesia. 2020 Jun;75(6):775-784. doi: 10.1111/anae.15036.
2
The Evolving Role of High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation as Salvage Therapy in Neurostimulation.高频脊髓刺激在神经刺激中的挽救治疗作用不断演变。
Pain Pract. 2020 Sep;20(7):706-713. doi: 10.1111/papr.12898. Epub 2020 May 15.
3
A Systematic Literature Review of Spine Neurostimulation Therapies for the Treatment of Pain.
Improved Outcomes and Therapy Longevity after Salvage Using a Novel Spinal Cord Stimulation System for Chronic Pain: Multicenter, Observational, European Case Series.
使用新型脊髓刺激系统治疗慢性疼痛进行挽救性治疗后的改善结果和治疗持久性:多中心、观察性欧洲病例系列研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 14;13(4):1079. doi: 10.3390/jcm13041079.
4
Spinal Cord Stimulation Meets Them All: An Effective Treatment for Different Pain Conditions. Our Experience and Literature Review.脊髓刺激满足一切需求:一种治疗多种疼痛病症的有效方法。我们的经验和文献回顾。
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2023;135:179-195. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-36084-8_29.
5
Research hotspots and trends on spinal cord stimulation for pain treatment: a two-decade bibliometric analysis.脊髓刺激治疗疼痛的研究热点与趋势:一项二十年的文献计量分析
Front Neurosci. 2023 May 25;17:1158712. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1158712. eCollection 2023.
6
Utilizing 10kHz Stimulation to Salvage a Failed Low Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation Trial.利用10kHz刺激挽救失败的低频脊髓刺激试验。
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2023 Jan 28;15:57624. doi: 10.52965/001c.57624. eCollection 2023.
7
Retrospective Efficacy and Cost-Containment Assessment of 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) in Non-Surgical Refractory Back Pain Patients.非手术难治性背痛患者10kHz脊髓刺激(SCS)的回顾性疗效及成本控制评估
J Pain Res. 2022 Nov 16;15:3589-3595. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S373873. eCollection 2022.
8
Patient Selection for Spinal Cord Stimulation in Treatment of Pain: Sequential Decision-Making Model - A Narrative Review.脊髓刺激治疗疼痛的患者选择:序贯决策模型——一篇叙述性综述
J Pain Res. 2022 Apr 20;15:1163-1171. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S250455. eCollection 2022.
9
Advances in Neuromodulation for Chronic Pain.慢性疼痛神经调节的进展
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 7;11(3):874. doi: 10.3390/jcm11030874.
10
Management of Chronic and Neuropathic Pain with 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation Technology: Summary of Findings from Preclinical and Clinical Studies.采用10kHz脊髓刺激技术治疗慢性和神经性疼痛:临床前和临床研究结果总结
Biomedicines. 2021 Jun 4;9(6):644. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9060644.
用于治疗疼痛的脊柱神经刺激疗法的系统文献综述
Pain Med. 2020 Nov 7;21(7):1421-1432. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz353.
4
Low-intensity, Kilohertz Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation Differently Affects Excitatory and Inhibitory Neurons in the Rodent Superficial Dorsal Horn.低强度、千赫兹频率脊髓刺激对啮齿动物浅层背角的兴奋性和抑制性神经元有不同的影响。
Neuroscience. 2020 Jan 21;428:132-139. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.12.031. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
5
Opioid-sparing effects of 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation: a review of clinical evidence.10kHz 脊髓刺激的阿片类药物节省效应:临床证据回顾。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2020 Feb;1462(1):53-64. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14236. Epub 2019 Oct 2.
6
10 kHz SCS therapy for chronic pain, effects on opioid usage: Post hoc analysis of data from two prospective studies.10 kHz SCS 疗法治疗慢性疼痛对阿片类药物使用的影响:两项前瞻性研究数据的事后分析。
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 7;9(1):11441. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47792-3.
7
Long-term efficacy of 1-1.2 kHz subthreshold spinal cord stimulation following failed traditional spinal cord stimulation: a retrospective case series.失败的传统脊髓电刺激后 1-1.2 kHz 亚阈脊髓刺激的长期疗效:回顾性病例系列。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Jan;44(1):107-110. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-000003.
8
High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation at 10 kHz for the Treatment of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Case Series of Patients With or Without Previous Spinal Cord Stimulator Implantation.10kHz高频脊髓刺激治疗复杂性区域疼痛综合征:有或无前脊髓刺激器植入患者的病例系列
Pain Pract. 2019 Mar;19(3):289-294. doi: 10.1111/papr.12739. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
9
Prospective, Randomized, Sham-Control, Double Blind, Crossover Trial of Subthreshold Spinal Cord Stimulation at Various Kilohertz Frequencies in Subjects Suffering From Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (SCS Frequency Study).在腰椎手术失败综合征患者中进行的不同千赫兹频率阈下脊髓刺激的前瞻性、随机、假对照、双盲、交叉试验(脊髓刺激频率研究)
Neuromodulation. 2018 Jul;21(5):457-465. doi: 10.1111/ner.12771. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
10
Spinal Cord Stimulator Explantation: Motives for Removal of Surgically Placed Paddle Systems.脊髓刺激器取出术:手术植入片状系统移除的动机
Pain Pract. 2018 Apr;18(4):500-504. doi: 10.1111/papr.12639. Epub 2017 Nov 20.