Suppr超能文献

对传统脊髓刺激(SCS)治疗失败的患者进行挽救性10kHz脊髓刺激(SCS)的回顾性评估:救援研究。

Retrospective Assessment of Salvage to 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) in Patients Who Failed Traditional SCS Therapy: RESCUE Study.

作者信息

Kapural Leonardo, Sayed Dawood, Kim Brian, Harstroem Caroline, Deering James

机构信息

Carolinas Pain Institute, Winston-Salem, NC 27103, USA.

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2020 Nov 10;13:2861-2867. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S281749. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

A randomized clinical trial demonstrated that 10 kHz SCS (10kHz-SCS) therapy is superior to traditional low-frequency SCS (LF-SCS) at 12- and 24-month clinical follow-ups and led to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the therapy. The results of the study led our practices to trial 10kHz-SCS in patients who had not maintained pain relief with LF-SCS therapy. Here, we report a large set of data from two clinical sites to assess if 10kHz-SCS is an effective salvage modality when LF-SCS fails.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of 120 patients across two clinical sites who had LF-SCS implants and were salvaged with 10kHz-SCS.

RESULTS

Data were analyzed from 105 patients between 28 and 90 years old (median 60) with chronic pain for 13.6 years. The mean duration of LF-SCS therapy was 4.66±3.9 years. The average Visual Analog Scale (VAS) decreased from 8.30±1.4 (median of 8) cm to 3.32±2.0 (median of 3) cm at 12 months and 3.36±2.0 (median of 3) cm at the most recent clinic visit (p<0.001) following salvage therapy. Pain relief of 50% or more was obtained in 85 out of 105 (81%) patients. Opioid usage decreased from 60.3±77.1 mg to 32.1±44.0 mg MSO4 equivalents (p = 0.001) at 12 months after salvage therapy.

CONCLUSION

Eighty-one percent of patient cases reviewed, where LF-SCS had failed, achieved >50% pain relief with 10kHz-SCS, and almost all exhibited some clinical improvement. Therefore, 10kHz-SCS should be considered an appropriate option to rescue failed LF-SCS.

摘要

背景与目的

一项随机临床试验表明,在12个月和24个月的临床随访中,10千赫兹脊髓刺激疗法(10kHz-SCS)优于传统低频脊髓刺激疗法(LF-SCS),并促使美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准了该疗法。该研究结果促使我们的医疗团队在那些接受LF-SCS治疗后疼痛未得到缓解的患者中试用10kHz-SCS。在此,我们报告来自两个临床地点的大量数据,以评估当LF-SCS失败时,10kHz-SCS是否为一种有效的挽救治疗方式。

方法

我们对两个临床地点的120例植入了LF-SCS并接受10kHz-SCS挽救治疗的患者进行了回顾性病历审查。

结果

分析了105例年龄在28至90岁(中位数60岁)、患有慢性疼痛13.6年的患者的数据。LF-SCS治疗的平均持续时间为4.66±3.9年。在挽救治疗后的12个月时,平均视觉模拟评分(VAS)从8.30±1.4(中位数8)厘米降至3.32±2.0(中位数3)厘米,在最近一次门诊就诊时降至3.36±2.0(中位数3)厘米(p<0.001)。105例患者中有85例(81%)疼痛缓解达50%或更多。在挽救治疗后12个月,阿片类药物的使用量从60.3±77.1毫克降至32.1±44.0毫克硫酸吗啡当量(p = 0.001)。

结论

在回顾的患者病例中,81%的患者在LF-SCS治疗失败后,通过10kHz-SCS实现了>50%的疼痛缓解,并且几乎所有患者都有一定的临床改善。因此,10kHz-SCS应被视为挽救失败的LF-SCS的合适选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5394/7667504/77d724f51306/JPR-13-2861-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验