• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肺癌筛查资格和低剂量计算机断层扫描的使用:来自 2018 年行为风险因素监测系统横断面调查的结果。

Lung cancer screening eligibility and use with low-dose computed tomography: Results from the 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System cross-sectional survey.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Department of Radiology, Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Cancer. 2021 Mar 1;127(5):748-756. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33322. Epub 2020 Nov 18.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.33322
PMID:33206388
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In randomized controlled trials, lung cancer screening with low-dose chest computed tomography (LCS) has been reported to reduce lung cancer mortality. Although initial studies suggested that only approximately 5% of eligible patients have undergone LCS, recent studies have indicated that use of LCS may be increasing nationwide. The objective of the current study was to estimate recent LCS use using cross-sectional survey data from the 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey.

METHODS

The BRFSS is a nationally representative, cross-sectional telephone survey of adults in the United States (response rate of approximately 50%). The 2018 BRFSS survey included questions regarding LCS eligibility and use in 8 states. The primary outcome was the percentage of participants (aged 55-79 years with a smoking history of >30 pack-years) who reported undergoing LCS. Logistic regression analyses evaluated the association between LCS use and sociodemographic characteristics, adjusted for potential confounders and accounting for complex survey design elements.

RESULTS

A total of 26,910 participants were included, 9.9% of whom were eligible for LCS (95% CI, 8.8%-10.6%). Of the eligible patients, 19.2% reported undergoing LCS (95% CI, 14.0%-24.4%). Approximately 16.4% of current smokers were eligible for LCS (95% CI, 14.2%-18.6%). In our multiple variable analyses of eligible patients, age, sex, marital status, current smoking status, and race were not found to be associated with statistically significant differences in reported LCS (P > .05). Retired patients, patients with personal physicians, and patients who did not complete a high school education were more likely to report receiving LCS (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with previously published studies, the results of the current study suggested that LCS use is increasing. However, LCS use remains low (19%) among eligible participants.

摘要

背景

在随机对照试验中,低剂量胸部计算机断层扫描(LCS)肺癌筛查已被报道可降低肺癌死亡率。尽管最初的研究表明,只有大约 5%的合格患者接受了 LCS,但最近的研究表明,全国范围内 LCS 的使用可能正在增加。本研究的目的是使用 2018 年行为风险因素监测系统(BRFSS)调查的横断面调查数据来估计最近的 LCS 使用情况。

方法

BRFSS 是一项针对美国成年人(应答率约为 50%)的全国代表性、横断面电话调查。2018 年 BRFSS 调查包括 8 个州关于 LCS 资格和使用的问题。主要结局是报告接受 LCS 的参与者(年龄在 55-79 岁,吸烟史>30 包年)的百分比。逻辑回归分析评估了 LCS 使用与社会人口统计学特征之间的关联,调整了潜在混杂因素,并考虑了复杂的调查设计因素。

结果

共纳入 26910 名参与者,其中 9.9%(95%CI,8.8%-10.6%)有资格接受 LCS。在合格患者中,19.2%(95%CI,14.0%-24.4%)报告接受了 LCS。大约 16.4%的当前吸烟者有资格接受 LCS(95%CI,14.2%-18.6%)。在我们对合格患者的多变量分析中,年龄、性别、婚姻状况、当前吸烟状况和种族与报告的 LCS 之间没有发现统计学上显著的差异(P>.05)。退休患者、有私人医生的患者和未完成高中学业的患者更有可能报告接受了 LCS(P<.05)。

结论

与之前发表的研究相比,本研究结果表明 LCS 的使用正在增加。然而,在合格的参与者中,LCS 的使用仍然很低(19%)。

相似文献

1
Lung cancer screening eligibility and use with low-dose computed tomography: Results from the 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System cross-sectional survey.肺癌筛查资格和低剂量计算机断层扫描的使用:来自 2018 年行为风险因素监测系统横断面调查的结果。
Cancer. 2021 Mar 1;127(5):748-756. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33322. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
2
Assessing Eligibility for Lung Cancer Screening Among Women Undergoing Screening Mammography: Cross-Sectional Survey Results From the National Health Interview Survey.评估接受筛查性乳房 X 光检查的女性进行肺癌筛查的资格:来自全国健康访谈调查的横断面调查结果。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Oct;16(10):1433-1439. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 May 16.
3
Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility and Utilization Among Transgender Patients: An Analysis of the 2017-2018 United States Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey.跨性别患者的肺癌筛查资格和利用情况:对 2017-2018 年美国行为风险因素监测系统调查的分析。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Dec 12;22(12):2164-2169. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa127.
4
Assessment of Uptake Appropriateness of Computed Tomography for Lung Cancer Screening According to Patients Meeting Eligibility Criteria of the US Preventive Services Task Force.根据美国预防服务工作组的资格标准,评估肺癌筛查用计算机断层扫描的适宜性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2243163. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.43163.
5
Lung Cancer Screening in the US, 2022.2022 年美国肺癌筛查
JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Aug 1;184(8):882-891. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.1655.
6
Lung cancer screening use and implications of varying eligibility criteria by race and ethnicity: 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data.肺癌筛查的使用情况以及不同种族和族裔的不同资格标准的影响:2019 年行为风险因素监测系统数据。
Cancer. 2022 May 1;128(9):1812-1819. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34098. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
7
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility.肺癌筛查资格中的种族和民族差异。
Radiology. 2021 Dec;301(3):712-720. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021204691. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
8
Factors associated with low-dose CT lung cancer screening participation in a high burden state: Results from the 2017-2018 BRFSS.与高负担州低剂量 CT 肺癌筛查参与相关的因素:来自 2017-2018 年 BRFSS 的结果。
J Cancer Policy. 2021 Jun;28:100284. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2021.100284. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
9
Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility and Use: A Population Health Perspective of One Community.肺癌筛查资格和使用:一个社区的人群健康视角。
N C Med J. 2021 Sep-Oct;82(5):321-326. doi: 10.18043/ncm.82.5.321.
10
Lung Cancer Screening: Characteristics of Nonparticipants and Potential Screening Barriers.肺癌筛查:非参与者的特征和潜在的筛查障碍。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2020 Sep;21(5):e329-e336. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2019.11.016. Epub 2020 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers to cancer screening uptake and approaches to overcome them: a systematic literature review.癌症筛查普及的障碍及克服这些障碍的方法:一项系统的文献综述
Front Oncol. 2025 Aug 6;15:1575820. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1575820. eCollection 2025.
2
Lung cancer screening experiences among patients with a smoking history and primary care providers: a qualitative study.有吸烟史患者与基层医疗服务提供者的肺癌筛查经历:一项定性研究
BMC Cancer. 2025 Aug 11;25(1):1305. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14716-6.
3
Multi-level factors associated with low dose computed tomography lung cancer screening in the United States.
美国低剂量计算机断层扫描肺癌筛查的多层面相关因素。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2025 Aug;117(4):225-234. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2025.05.002. Epub 2025 May 29.
4
Lung Cancer Screening Rates in the United States: Contribution of the 2020 NHIS Estimates to National and State-Level Trends.美国肺癌筛查率:2020年美国国家健康访谈调查(NHIS)估计值对国家和州层面趋势的贡献。
Am J Prev Med. 2025 Jul;69(1):107626. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2025.03.006. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
5
Benchmarking lung cancer screening programmes with adaptive screening frequency against the optimal screening schedules derived from the ENGAGE framework: a comparative microsimulation study.将采用适应性筛查频率的肺癌筛查计划与源自ENGAGE框架的最优筛查方案进行对比:一项比较性微观模拟研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Jul 28;74:102743. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102743. eCollection 2024 Aug.
6
The TELEhealth Shared decision-making COaching and navigation in Primary carE (TELESCOPE) intervention: a study protocol for delivering shared decision-making for lung cancer screening by patient navigators.远程医疗共享决策辅导和初级保健导航(TELESCOPE)干预:通过患者导航员提供肺癌筛查共享决策的研究方案。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Oct 18;25(1):373. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02610-2.
7
Characteristics of lung cancer screening eligible population in the US and prediction of the eligibility with simplified criteria.美国肺癌筛查 eligible 人群的特征及简化标准对 eligibility 的预测
Transl Cancer Res. 2024 May 31;13(5):2155-2163. doi: 10.21037/tcr-23-1942. Epub 2024 May 20.
8
Exploring shared decision-making needs in lung cancer screening among high-risk groups and health care providers in China: a qualitative study.探索中国肺癌筛查高危人群和医疗服务提供者的共同决策需求:一项定性研究。
BMC Cancer. 2024 May 21;24(1):613. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12360-0.
9
The TELEhealth Shared decision-making Coaching and Navigation in Primary carE (TELESCOPE) intervention: a study protocol for delivering shared decision-making for lung cancer screening by patient navigators.远程医疗初级保健中的共同决策指导与导航(TELESCOPE)干预:一项关于患者导航员开展肺癌筛查共同决策的研究方案
Res Sq. 2024 Apr 22:rs.3.rs-4254047. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4254047/v1.
10
Acceptability of Personalized Lung Cancer Screening Program Among Primary Care Providers.基层医疗服务提供者对肺癌个体化筛查项目的可接受性。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2024 Feb 2;17(2):51-57. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-23-0359.