• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有吸烟史患者与基层医疗服务提供者的肺癌筛查经历:一项定性研究

Lung cancer screening experiences among patients with a smoking history and primary care providers: a qualitative study.

作者信息

Japuntich Sandra J, Sacasa Nathalia Gutierrez, Cameron Sarah, Balletto Brittany, Tambou Olive, Berman Gabriel, Walaska Kristen, Clark Melissa A, Carey Michael P, Busch Andrew M, Rosen Rochelle

机构信息

Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, 701 Park Ave., S9.303, Minneapolis, MN, 55415, USA.

Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, 420 Delaware St. SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2025 Aug 11;25(1):1305. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14716-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12885-025-14716-6
PMID:40790732
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer screening (LCS) with low dose CT can identify early-stage lung cancer and reduce lung cancer mortality. LCS is underutilized. Patient and provider concerns and experiences may contribute to low utilization.

OBJECTIVE

To categorize patient and provider experiences with lung cancer screening to identify barriers to utilization.

DESIGN

Mixed methods study with a survey plus a qualitative interview.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants were 50 patients aged 55-80 with a smoking history and 7 primary care physicians in the United States.

METHODS

Participants were interviewed about LCS perceptions and experiences. Transcripts were double-coded and an Applied Thematic Analysis identified key themes.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients (68% of those with valid data) met US Preventive Services Taskforce guideline criteria for lung cancer screening, 11 (22%) self-reported tests consistent with LCS. Five main themes emerged: (1) Patient knowledge about LCS is low, even among those screened. Provider knowledge is high. (2) Low dose CT for LCS is well tolerated by patients and acceptable to providers. (3) Provider behavior is influenced by public health guidelines but not insurance coverage. (4) Shared decision-making is not always engaged in. (5) System barriers in the referral process affect LCS receipt despite patient interest in LCS.

CONCLUSIONS

LCS is well tolerated by patients and valued by providers. To increase LCS knowledge and uptake, systems changes are needed to facilitate shared decision-making conversations, simplify the referral process, and provide care navigation to increase patient logistical barriers to uptake.

摘要

背景

低剂量CT肺癌筛查(LCS)可识别早期肺癌并降低肺癌死亡率。LCS的利用率较低。患者和医疗服务提供者的担忧及经历可能导致利用率低下。

目的

对肺癌筛查中患者和医疗服务提供者的经历进行分类,以确定利用率的障碍。

设计

采用调查加定性访谈的混合方法研究。

参与者

参与者为美国50名年龄在55 - 80岁且有吸烟史的患者和7名初级保健医生。

方法

就LCS的认知和经历对参与者进行访谈。对访谈记录进行双重编码,并通过应用主题分析确定关键主题。

结果

32名患者(占有效数据患者的68%)符合美国预防服务工作组肺癌筛查指南标准,11名(22%)自我报告的检测符合LCS。出现了五个主要主题:(1)患者对LCS的了解程度较低,即使是在接受筛查的患者中也是如此。医疗服务提供者的了解程度较高。(2)患者对用于LCS的低剂量CT耐受性良好,医疗服务提供者也认可。(3)医疗服务提供者的行为受公共卫生指南影响,但不受保险覆盖范围影响。(4)并非总是进行共同决策。(5)尽管患者对LCS感兴趣,但转诊过程中的系统障碍影响了LCS的接受情况。

结论

患者对LCS耐受性良好,医疗服务提供者重视LCS。为了提高对LCS的了解和接受程度,需要进行系统变革,以促进共同决策对话,简化转诊流程,并提供护理导航,以减少患者接受筛查的后勤障碍。

相似文献

1
Lung cancer screening experiences among patients with a smoking history and primary care providers: a qualitative study.有吸烟史患者与基层医疗服务提供者的肺癌筛查经历:一项定性研究
BMC Cancer. 2025 Aug 11;25(1):1305. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14716-6.
2
Providing Reminders and Education Prior to lung cancer screening: Feasibility and acceptability of a multilevel approach to address disparities in lung cancer screening.肺癌筛查前提供提醒与教育:采用多层次方法解决肺癌筛查差异的可行性与可接受性
Transl Behav Med. 2025 Jan 16;15(1). doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaf008.
3
Prediction-Augmented Shared Decision-Making and Lung Cancer Screening Uptake.预测增强型共享决策与肺癌筛查参与度。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2419624. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.19624.
4
Tackling Guideline Non-concordance: Primary Care Barriers to Incorporating Life Expectancy into Lung Cancer Screening Decision-Making-A Qualitative Study.解决指南不一致问题:将预期寿命纳入肺癌筛查决策的初级保健障碍 - 一项定性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Sep;39(12):2284-2291. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08705-x. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
5
The MyLungHealth study protocol: a pragmatic patient-randomised controlled trial to evaluate a patient-centred, electronic health record-integrated intervention to enhance lung cancer screening in primary care.“我的肺部健康”研究方案:一项实用的患者随机对照试验,旨在评估一种以患者为中心、整合电子健康记录的干预措施,以加强初级保健中的肺癌筛查。
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 22;14(12):e087056. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087056.
6
Homelessness, Patient Navigation, and Lung Cancer Screening in a Health Center Setting: A Subgroup Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.健康中心环境下的无家可归、患者导航与肺癌筛查:一项随机临床试验的亚组分析
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2519780. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.19780.
7
Linking Patient Perceptions of Shared Decision Making to Satisfaction in Lung Cancer Screening Decisions.将患者对共同决策的认知与肺癌筛查决策中的满意度相联系。
Med Decis Making. 2025 Jul;45(5):522-532. doi: 10.1177/0272989X251333451. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
8
Using Community Health Advisors to Increase Lung Cancer Screening Awareness in the Black Belt: a Pilot Study.利用社区健康顾问提高黑带地区肺癌筛查意识:一项试点研究。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Aug;38(4):1286-1295. doi: 10.1007/s13187-022-02261-w. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
9
Reducing Smoking Requirements for Lung Screening to Address Health Disparities in a Community Cohort.降低肺部筛查的吸烟要求以解决社区队列中的健康差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2517149. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.17149.
10
Implementing a Tribally Engaged Lung Cancer Screening Pilot Program in Rural Oklahoma.在俄克拉荷马州农村地区实施部落参与的肺癌筛查试点项目。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2025 Jul 1;18(7):423-430. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0348.

本文引用的文献

1
Lung cancer screening provider recommendation and completion in black and White patients with a smoking history in two healthcare systems: a survey study.在两个医疗保健系统中,有吸烟史的黑人和白人患者的肺癌筛查提供者推荐和完成情况:一项调查研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jun 7;25(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02452-y.
2
Why is the screening rate in lung cancer still low? A seven-country analysis of the factors affecting adoption.为什么肺癌筛查率仍然较低?影响采用因素的七国分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 9;11:1264342. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1264342. eCollection 2023.
3
The global burden of lung cancer: current status and future trends.
全球肺癌负担:现状与未来趋势。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2023 Sep;20(9):624-639. doi: 10.1038/s41571-023-00798-3. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
4
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death.结肠镜筛查对结直肠癌发病风险和相关死亡的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Oct 27;387(17):1547-1556. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2208375. Epub 2022 Oct 9.
5
Should we screen for lung cancer? A 10-country analysis identifying key decision-making factors.我们应该进行肺癌筛查吗?一项确定关键决策因素的十国分析。
Health Policy. 2022 Sep;126(9):879-888. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.06.003. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
6
Referring high-risk individuals for lung cancer screening: A systematic review of interventions with healthcare professionals.将高危个体转诊至肺癌筛查:对针对医疗保健专业人员的干预措施的系统评价。
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2022 Nov 1;31(6):540-550. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000755. Epub 2022 May 5.
7
Psychological Targets for Lung Cancer Screening Uptake: A Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study.肺癌筛查接受度的心理目标:一项前瞻性纵向队列研究。
J Thorac Oncol. 2021 Dec;16(12):2016-2028. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.07.025. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
8
Shared Decision-Making for Lung Cancer Screening: How Well Are We "Sharing"?肺癌筛查的共享决策:我们的“共享”做得如何?
Chest. 2021 Jul;160(1):330-340. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.01.041. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
9
Perceptions of and Barriers to Lung Cancer Screening Among Physicians in Puerto Rico: A Qualitative Study.波多黎各医生对肺癌筛查的看法和障碍:一项定性研究。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2020;31(2):973-991. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2020.0072.
10
Lung cancer screening eligibility and use with low-dose computed tomography: Results from the 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System cross-sectional survey.肺癌筛查资格和低剂量计算机断层扫描的使用:来自 2018 年行为风险因素监测系统横断面调查的结果。
Cancer. 2021 Mar 1;127(5):748-756. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33322. Epub 2020 Nov 18.