Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.
Department of Endodontics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Nov 16;56(11):615. doi: 10.3390/medicina56110615.
The complete removal of obturation material can be a challenge in nonsurgical root canal retreatment. The insufficient removal of obturation material is a reason for root canal retreatment failure. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of different final root canal irrigation activation methods in removing debris and smear layers in the apical and middle portions of root canals during retreatment. Sixty-six distal roots of freshly extracted molars were randomly divided into six groups: (1) primary root canal treatment with no obturation (negative control); (2) retreatment with only conventional instrumentation and irrigation (positive control); (3) retreatment with additional ultrasonic irrigation using the Piezon Master 700; (4) ultrasonic irrigation with the ENDOSONIC Blue; (5) sonic irrigation with the EDDY; and (6) multisonic irrigation with the GentleWave system. Roots were split and prepared for scanning electron microscopic (SEM) evaluation. Acquired images were assessed to quantify the amount of debris and smear remaining. Among the treatment groups, Group 6 had a significantly lower debris score than Group 2 (positive control) in both the middle and apical regions ( = 0.004, = 0.012). All treatment groups showed significantly lower smear scores than Group 2 in the middle and apical regions ( < 0.05). The GentleWave multisonic System showed a more optimal cleaning efficacy of the root canal debris but did not differ significantly with the tested passive ultrasonic or sonic irrigation method.
在非手术性根管再治疗中,完全清除充填材料可能是一个挑战。充填材料清除不充分是根管再治疗失败的原因之一。本研究旨在评估不同的最终根管冲洗激活方法在再治疗中去除根尖和中段根管内的碎屑和玷污层的效果。将 66 个新鲜拔出的磨牙近中根随机分为六组:(1)无充填的初次根管治疗(阴性对照);(2)仅用常规器械和冲洗进行再治疗(阳性对照);(3)用 Piezon Master 700 进行附加超声冲洗;(4)用 ENDOSONIC Blue 进行超声冲洗;(5)用 EDDY 进行超声冲洗;(6)用 GentleWave 系统进行多声冲洗。对根进行劈开并准备进行扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评估。获取的图像用于评估剩余的碎屑和玷污层的量。在治疗组中,与阳性对照组(2 组)相比,6 组在中间和根尖区域的碎屑评分明显较低(=0.004,=0.012)。所有治疗组在中间和根尖区域的玷污层评分均明显低于 2 组(<0.05)。GentleWave 多声系统显示出更优的根管碎屑清洁效果,但与测试的被动超声或超声冲洗方法无显著差异。