Sun Qin, Xie Jianfeng, Zheng Ruiqiang, Li Xuyan, Chen Hui, Tong Zhaohui, Du Bin, Qiu Haibo, Yang Yi
Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, No. 87, Dingjiaqiao Road, Gulou District, Nanjing 210009, PR China.
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Yangzhou University, No. 98, Nantongxi Road, Guangling District, Yangzhou 225000, PR China.
Int Immunopharmacol. 2021 Jan;90:107143. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.107143. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
Thymosin α1 therapy was commonly used in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), while its impact on outcomes and which patients could benefit from thymosin α1 therapy were uncertain.
Patients with COVID-19 from 19 designated hospitals between January 1 to February 29, 2020 were included, and the main exposure of interest was administration of thymosin α1. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to account for baseline confounders, cluster analysis and Cox proportional hazard model was used to account for subgroup analysis.
A total of 771 patients were included, and 327/771 (42.4%) patients received thymosin α1 therapy. The 28-day mortality in thymosin group was significantly lower than that in control group (41.3% vs. 60.6%, p < 0.001). After PSM 522 patients were included in analysis and the 28-day mortality in thymosin α1 group and control group were 51.0% and 52.9% respectively, with no significant difference. In subgroup analyses, the association between thymosin α1 therapy and 28-day mortality appeared to be stronger among male patients (HR 0.673, 95% CI 0.454-0.998; p = 0.049). There were no benefits of thymosin α1 in 28-day mortality in other subgroups. There were two phenotypes after cluster analysis, but no benefits of thymosin α1 were shown in phenotype 1 (HR 0.823 95% CI 0.581-1.166; p = 0.273) and phenotype 2 (HR 1.148 95% CI 0.710-1.895; p = 0.442).
There was no association between use of thymosin α1 and decreased mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Subgroups analysis and phenotype analysis also showed no differences on mortality after thymosin α1 therapy.
胸腺肽α1疗法常用于2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者,但它对治疗结果的影响以及哪些患者能从胸腺肽α1疗法中获益尚不确定。
纳入2020年1月1日至2月29日期间来自19家指定医院的COVID-19患者,主要关注的暴露因素是胸腺肽α1的使用。主要结局是28天死亡率。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来处理基线混杂因素,采用聚类分析和Cox比例风险模型进行亚组分析。
共纳入771例患者,其中327/771(42.4%)例患者接受了胸腺肽α1治疗。胸腺肽组的28天死亡率显著低于对照组(41.3%对60.6%,p<0.001)。PSM后纳入522例患者进行分析,胸腺肽α1组和对照组的28天死亡率分别为51.0%和52.9%,无显著差异。在亚组分析中,胸腺肽α1疗法与28天死亡率之间的关联在男性患者中似乎更强(风险比0.673,95%置信区间0.454 - 0.998;p = 0.049)。在其他亚组中,胸腺肽α1对28天死亡率无益处。聚类分析后有两种表型,但在表型1(风险比0.823,95%置信区间0.581 - 1.166;p = 0.273)和表型2(风险比1.148,95%置信区间0.710 - 1.895;p = 0.442)中均未显示胸腺肽α1有任何益处。
在重症COVID-19患者中,使用胸腺肽α1与降低死亡率之间无关联。亚组分析和表型分析也显示胸腺肽α1治疗后在死亡率方面无差异。