• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人腹股沟疝修补术的结果:手术时间和成本分析。

Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair Outcomes: Operative Time and Cost Analysis.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA.

Department of General Surgery, Geisinger Wyoming Valley Medical Center, Wilkes-Barre, PA.

出版信息

JSLS. 2020 Oct-Dec;24(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00058.

DOI:10.4293/JSLS.2020.00058
PMID:33209013
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7646555/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Robotic inguinal hernia repair is the latest iteration of minimally invasive herniorrhaphy. Previous studies have shown expedited learning curves compared to traditional laparoscopy, which may be offset by higher cost and longer operative time. We sought to compare operative time and direct cost across the evolving surgical practice of 10 surgeons in our healthcare system.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of all transabdominal preperitoneal robotic inguinal hernia repairs performed by 10 general surgeons from July 2015 to September 2018. Patients requiring conversion to an open procedure or undergoing simultaneous procedures were excluded. The data was divided to compare each surgeon's initial 20 cases to their subsequent cases. Direct operative cost was calculated based on the sum of supplies used intra-operatively. Multivariate analysis, using a generalized estimating equation, was adjusted for laterality and resident involvement to evaluate outcomes.

RESULTS

Robotic inguinal hernia repairs were divided into two groups: early experience (n = 167) and late experience (n = 262). The late experience had a shorter mean operative time by 17.6 min (confidence interval: 4.06 - 31.13, p = 0.011), a lower mean direct operative cost by $538.17 (confidence interval: 307.14 - 769.20, p < 0.0001), and fewer postoperative complications (p = 0.030) on multivariate analysis. Thirty-day readmission rates were similar between both groups.

CONCLUSION

Increasing surgeon experience with robotic inguinal hernia repair is associated with a predictable reduction in operative time, complication rates, and direct operative cost per case. Thirty-day readmission rates are not affected by the learning curve.

摘要

背景

机器人腹股沟疝修补术是微创疝修补术的最新迭代。先前的研究表明,与传统腹腔镜相比,它的学习曲线更快,但其成本更高,手术时间更长。我们试图比较我们医疗系统中 10 位外科医生不断发展的手术实践中的手术时间和直接成本。

方法

这是对 2015 年 7 月至 2018 年 9 月期间 10 位普外科医生进行的所有经腹腹膜前机器人腹股沟疝修补术的回顾性研究。排除需要转为开放手术或同时进行手术的患者。根据术中使用的耗材总和计算直接手术成本。使用广义估计方程进行多变量分析,调整了侧别和住院医师参与情况,以评估结果。

结果

机器人腹股沟疝修补术分为两组:早期经验(n = 167)和晚期经验(n = 262)。晚期经验的平均手术时间缩短了 17.6 分钟(置信区间:4.06-31.13,p = 0.011),平均直接手术成本降低了 538.17 美元(置信区间:307.14-769.20,p < 0.0001),并且术后并发症更少(p = 0.030)。多变量分析显示,两组 30 天再入院率相似。

结论

外科医生在机器人腹股沟疝修补术方面的经验不断增加,与手术时间、并发症发生率和每例手术的直接手术成本的可预测降低相关。学习曲线不会影响 30 天再入院率。

相似文献

1
Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair Outcomes: Operative Time and Cost Analysis.机器人腹股沟疝修补术的结果:手术时间和成本分析。
JSLS. 2020 Oct-Dec;24(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00058.
2
Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair.机器人辅助与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)腹股沟疝修补术的比较。
J Robot Surg. 2016 Sep;10(3):239-44. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0580-1. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
3
Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Large Health System's Experience With the First 300 Cases and Review of the Literature.机器人腹股沟疝修补术:首个 300 例大型医疗体系的经验及文献回顾。
J Surg Res. 2019 Mar;235:98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.070. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
4
Economic assessment of starting robot-assisted laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in a single-centre retrospective comparative study: the EASTER study.在单中心回顾性对照研究中开展机器人辅助腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的经济评估:EASTER 研究。
BJS Open. 2021 Jan 8;5(1). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa046.
5
Transition from Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair to Robotic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Retrospective Review of a Single Surgeon's Experience.从腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术过渡到机器人经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术:单中心回顾性研究
World J Surg. 2017 Sep;41(9):2251-2257. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-3998-3.
6
Perioperative outcomes and cost of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.机器人辅助与腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的围手术期结果和成本。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Aug;34(8):3496-3507. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07128-8. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
7
Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a comprehensive cost analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜单侧腹股沟疝修补术:全面的成本分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3436-3443. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06606-9. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
8
Open vs. robot-assisted preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Are they truly clinically different?开放式与机器人辅助腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术。它们在临床上真的有区别吗?
Hernia. 2024 Aug;28(4):1355-1363. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03050-8. Epub 2024 May 4.
9
Robotic Inguinal vs Transabdominal Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: The RIVAL Randomized Clinical Trial.机器人腹股沟与经腹腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:RIVAL 随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2020 May 1;155(5):380-387. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0034.
10
Safety and short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia in pioneering hospitals in Japan: A nationwide retrospective cohort study.日本开拓医院机器人辅助经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的安全性和短期结果:一项全国性回顾性队列研究。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2024 Jan;17(1):e13251. doi: 10.1111/ases.13251. Epub 2023 Oct 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes During the Learning Curve and Feasibility of Implementing the European Hernia Society Recommendation Guidelines for Robotic Abdominal Wall Surgery Within a UK Centre.英国一家中心在学习曲线期间的结果以及实施欧洲疝学会机器人腹壁手术推荐指南的可行性
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2025 Aug 6;4:15008. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2025.15008. eCollection 2025.
2
Contemporary inguinal hernia repair: do cost and operative time still differ by approach?当代腹股沟疝修补术:手术费用和手术时间仍因手术方式而异吗?
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jun;39(6):3587-3591. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11722-4. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
3
Earlier Experience of Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair With the New Hugo™ Robotic System in Europe.

本文引用的文献

1
Resident training experience with robotic assisted transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.机器人辅助经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的住院医师培训经验。
Am J Surg. 2020 Feb;219(2):278-282. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.11.014. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
2
Robot assisted versus laparoscopic suturing learning curve in a simulated setting.机器人辅助与腹腔镜缝合在模拟环境中的学习曲线。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Aug;34(8):3679-3689. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07263-2. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
3
Perioperative outcomes and cost of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.
欧洲使用新型Hugo™机器人系统进行机器人腹股沟疝修补术的早期经验。
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2025 Mar 31;4:13880. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2025.13880. eCollection 2025.
4
Long-term quality of life outcomes following robotic inguinal hernioplasty: a single-centre experience of 100 cases.机器人腹股沟疝修补术后的长期生活质量结果:100例单中心经验。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Apr 15;19(1):160. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02317-1.
5
A Systematic Review of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair: Management of Inguinal Hernias in the 21st Century.开放手术、腹腔镜手术及机器人辅助腹股沟疝修补术的系统评价:21世纪腹股沟疝的管理
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 4;14(3):990. doi: 10.3390/jcm14030990.
6
Is There a Place for Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair in the Realm of Laparoscopic and Open Inguinal Hernia Repair? A Narrative Review.在腹腔镜和开放腹股沟疝修补领域,机器人腹股沟疝修补术有立足之地吗?一项叙述性综述。
Maedica (Bucur). 2024 Sep;19(3):607-613. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2024.19.3.607.
7
Hospital costs of robotic-assisted and open treatment of large ventral hernias.机器人辅助与开放式治疗大型腹侧疝的医院成本。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 21;14(1):11523. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62550-w.
8
Open vs. robot-assisted preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Are they truly clinically different?开放式与机器人辅助腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术。它们在临床上真的有区别吗?
Hernia. 2024 Aug;28(4):1355-1363. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03050-8. Epub 2024 May 4.
9
Risk factors for reoperation following inguinal hernia repair: results from a cohort of patients from an integrated healthcare system.腹股沟疝修补术后再次手术的风险因素:来自综合医疗系统的患者队列研究结果。
Hernia. 2023 Dec;27(6):1515-1524. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02922-9. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
10
Effect of operative times in bariatric surgery on outcomes: a matched analysis of the MBSAQIP database.减重手术中手术时间对结局的影响:MBSAQIP 数据库的匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4113-4122. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09927-6. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
机器人辅助与腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的围手术期结果和成本。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Aug;34(8):3496-3507. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07128-8. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
4
The paradox of the robotic approach to inguinal hernia repair in the inpatient setting.机器人在住院环境中进行腹股沟疝修补术的悖论。
Am J Surg. 2020 Mar;219(3):497-501. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.09.012. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
5
A direct comparison of robotic and laparoscopic hernia repair: patient-reported outcomes and cost analysis.机器人与腹腔镜疝修补术的直接比较:患者报告的结果和成本分析。
Hernia. 2019 Dec;23(6):1115-1121. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01943-7. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
6
Predictors of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair.机器人与腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的预测因素。
J Surg Res. 2019 Sep;241:247-253. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.03.056. Epub 2019 Apr 28.
7
Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair: Outcomes and Predictors of Complications.开放、腹腔镜和机器人腹股沟疝修补术:并发症的结果和预测因素。
J Surg Res. 2019 Sep;241:119-127. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.03.046. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
8
Mechanisms of age and race differences in receiving minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair.年龄和种族差异导致接受微创腹股沟疝修补术的机制。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Dec;33(12):4032-4037. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06695-0. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
9
Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Large Health System's Experience With the First 300 Cases and Review of the Literature.机器人腹股沟疝修补术:首个 300 例大型医疗体系的经验及文献回顾。
J Surg Res. 2019 Mar;235:98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.070. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
10
Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a comprehensive cost analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜单侧腹股沟疝修补术:全面的成本分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3436-3443. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06606-9. Epub 2018 Dec 7.