Suppr超能文献

急性A型主动脉夹层后进行全弓置换是否会增加风险?

Is total arch replacement associated with an increased risk after acute type A dissection?

作者信息

Salem Mohamed, Friedrich Christine, Rusch Rene, Frank Derk, Hoffmann Grischa, Lutter Georg, Berndt Rouven, Cremer Jochen, Haneya Assad, Puehler Thomas

机构信息

Department of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.

Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2020 Oct;12(10):5517-5531. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-871.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The surgical strategy for acute type A aortic dissection (AADA) usually consists of reconstruction of the tear-lesion in the affected part of the ascending aorta. The optimal strategy either to replace the ascending aorta (AAR) or to replace the ascending aorta and the total aortic arch (TAAR) is still under debate. Our study compares the 30-day mortality between AAR and TAAR in AADA surgery.

METHODS

In this retrospective observational study, we analysed a total patient cohort of 339 patients who underwent surgery for AADA from January 2001 until December 2016. A propensity score-matched analysis between the AAR- and the TAAR-group with 43 patients for each subgroup was subsequently carried out. A multivariable analysis was performed to identify risk-factors for the 30-d-mortality. The 30-day mortality was defined as the primary end-point and long-term survival was the secondary endpoint.

RESULTS

In 292 (86.1%) patients AAR and in 47 (13.9%) patients TAAR was performed for emergent AADA. Patients were older (P=0.049) in the AAR group. The median log Euro-SCORE was 25.5% (12.7; 41.7) for AAR and 19.7% (11.7; 32.2) for the TAAR patient cohort (P=0.12). Operative time, cardiopulmonary bypass- (CPB), cross-clamp- and ischemic time were significantly longer in the TAAR group (P<0.001). The overall 30-day mortality-rate was 17.7% (n=60) but was not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.27). Forty-nine (16.8%) patients died in the AAR and 11 patients (23.4%) in the TAAR group. After propensity-score matching, no difference in mortality was seen between the subgroups as well (P=0.44). Multivariable analysis identified the Euro-SCORE, long operation-time, postoperative dialysis and arrhythmia and administration of red blood cell concentrates as risk factors for 30-day mortality, but not for TAAR versus AAR.

CONCLUSIONS

The therapeutic goal in AADA surgery should be the complete restoration of the aorta to avoid further long-term complications and re-operations. Though 30-day mortality and postoperative co-morbidity for AAR are comparable to those in TAAR after treatment of AADA in our analysis, decision-making for the surgical strategy should weigh the operative risk of TAAR against the long-term outcome.

摘要

背景

急性A型主动脉夹层(AADA)的手术策略通常包括重建升主动脉病变部位的撕裂口。对于是置换升主动脉(AAR)还是置换升主动脉及整个主动脉弓(TAAR)的最佳策略仍存在争议。我们的研究比较了AADA手术中AAR和TAAR的30天死亡率。

方法

在这项回顾性观察研究中,我们分析了2001年1月至2016年12月期间接受AADA手术的339例患者的总体队列。随后对AAR组和TAAR组进行倾向评分匹配分析,每个亚组各43例患者。进行多变量分析以确定30天死亡率的危险因素。将30天死亡率定义为主要终点,长期生存率为次要终点。

结果

292例(86.1%)患者接受了AAR手术,47例(13.9%)患者接受了TAAR手术以治疗急诊AADA。AAR组患者年龄较大(P=0.049)。AAR患者队列的欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(Euro-SCORE)中位数为25.5%(12.7;41.7),TAAR患者队列为19.7%(11.7;32.2)(P=0.12)。TAAR组的手术时间、体外循环(CPB)时间、主动脉阻断时间和缺血时间明显更长(P<0.001)。总体30天死亡率为17.7%(n=60),但两组之间无显著差异(P=0.27)。AAR组49例(16.8%)患者死亡,TAAR组11例(23.4%)患者死亡。倾向评分匹配后,亚组之间的死亡率也无差异(P=0.44)。多变量分析确定欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统评分、手术时间长、术后透析、心律失常和输注红细胞浓缩液是30天死亡率的危险因素,但不是TAAR与AAR相比的危险因素。

结论

AADA手术的治疗目标应是主动脉的完全修复,以避免进一步的长期并发症和再次手术。尽管在我们的分析中,AADA治疗后AAR的30天死亡率和术后合并症与TAAR相当,但手术策略的决策应权衡TAAR的手术风险与长期预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d4d/7656345/e9aa23f5baaa/jtd-12-10-5517-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验