Social Cognition Center Cologne, University of Cologne.
Differential Psychology and Psychological Assessment, University of Hamburg.
Emotion. 2021 Aug;21(5):905-920. doi: 10.1037/emo0000923. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
When people encounter others surpassing them in terms of an important quality, possession, or achievement, they often think about what might have happened differently so that they would have obtained a better outcome. Such upward counterfactual thoughts have been shown to contribute to the intensity of envy. We investigated whether specific counterfactual thoughts distinguish different forms of envy, namely benign envy, which entails upward motivation, and malicious envy-which entails hostility. A meta-analysis of 8 studies (1 preregistered, = 1,264) of a first line of research supports that recalled episodes of benign versus malicious envy are characterized by more additive, self-focused counterfactuals or by more other-focused counterfactuals, respectively. Furthermore, a meta-analysis of 6 studies (1 preregistered, = 1,299) of a second line of research supports that eliciting these counterfactuals promotes the corresponding form of envy. In line with functional accounts of counterfactual thinking and envy, the results highlight cognitive processes that underlie functionally diverging pathways of envious responding. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
当人们在重要的品质、拥有物或成就方面被他人超越时,他们往往会思考如果事情有所不同,他们会得到怎样更好的结果。这种向上的反事实思维被证明会加剧嫉妒的强度。我们研究了特定的反事实思维是否可以区分不同形式的嫉妒,即良性嫉妒,它包含向上的动机,以及恶性嫉妒——它包含敌意。对 8 项研究(1 项预先注册,N=1264)的元分析支持了这样的观点,即回忆起良性嫉妒和恶性嫉妒的片段分别以更多的附加的、以自我为中心的反事实思维或以更多的以他人为中心的反事实思维为特征。此外,对 6 项研究(1 项预先注册,N=1299)的元分析支持了诱发这些反事实思维会促进相应形式的嫉妒。与反事实思维和嫉妒的功能解释一致,这些结果突出了潜在的认知过程,这些过程为嫉妒反应的功能分歧路径提供了依据。