Klin Onkol. 2020 Fall;33(Supplementum 3):20-25. doi: 10.14735/amko20203S20.
Hepatocellular carcinoma remains a serious global disease. Its incidence is increasing. Standard procedures have been developed for each stage. The complexity of this disease shows that the selection of patients in stage 0/A for different types of surgical treatment is very complicated. Treatment methods of stage B, especially locoregional treatment represented by TACE (transarterial chemoembolization or radioembolization of TARE), radiofrequency ablation and others, move freely to lower and higher stages as adjunctive therapy. Lenvatinib can replace TACE with equal efficacy in cases where locoregional treatment cannot be used. Until 2016, the only systemic treatment option for stage C was sorafenib. Lenvatinib became a second-line drug to show non-inferiority to sorafenib in OS. Retrospective analyzes revealed that patients who responded to the treatment with lenvatinib or sorafenib had a median survival of over 22 months. Sequential treatment with sorafenib and regorafenib in the RESOURCE study with a median survival of more than 24 months was similar. Ramucirumab was effective only in patients with high AFP levels. The study demonstrated the importance of selecting patients according to prognostic factors (extrahepatic spread and vascular invasion). Second-line cabozantinib has shown the same benefit as regorafenib. In the second line, immunotherapy represented by anti PD-1 antibodies nivolumab and pembrolizumab was used. Sequential administration after sorafenib prolonged the median overall survival of about 22 months. We currently have sorafenib and lenvatinib in the first line, regorafenib, cabozantinib, ramucirumab (AFP 400 μg/L), pembrolizumab and nivolumab in the second line. The possibilities of monotherapy have been exhausted. The discovery of a synergistic effect of angiogenesis inhibitors, which convert a cold tumor into a hot one and facilitate the efficacy of anti-PD-1 / anti-PDL-1 antibodies, has led to a highly effective combination therapy. In study IMbrave150, the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab was successfully used compared to sorafenib in the first-line treatment. Additional studies are currently underway using other tyrosin kinase inhibitors - regorafenib, lenvatinib and cabozantinib - in combination with nivolumab, ipilimumab and pembrolizumab. This development of treatment at all stages evoked with renewed urgency the need to find a suitable way to search for the early stages of HCC and to create a more effective system for selecting patients for the most appropriate treatment.
肝细胞癌仍然是一种严重的全球性疾病。其发病率正在上升。每个阶段都制定了标准程序。这种疾病的复杂性表明,对于 0/A 期的不同类型手术治疗的患者选择非常复杂。B 期的治疗方法,特别是 TACE(经动脉化疗栓塞或 TARE 放射性栓塞)、射频消融等局部区域治疗,作为辅助治疗可以自由地转移到较低和较高的阶段。仑伐替尼可以替代局部区域治疗无法使用的 TACE,具有等效疗效。直到 2016 年,C 期的唯一系统治疗选择是索拉非尼。仑伐替尼成为二线药物,在 OS 中显示出非劣效性优于索拉非尼。回顾性分析显示,对仑伐替尼或索拉非尼治疗有反应的患者中位生存期超过 22 个月。在 RESOURCE 研究中,索拉非尼和regorafenib 的序贯治疗中位生存期超过 24 个月,结果相似。ramucirumab 仅对 AFP 水平高的患者有效。该研究证明了根据预后因素(肝外扩散和血管侵犯)选择患者的重要性。二线药物 cabozantinib 与 regorafenib 疗效相同。二线药物包括抗 PD-1 抗体 nivolumab 和 pembrolizumab 代表的免疫疗法。索拉非尼序贯给药可使中位总生存期延长约 22 个月。我们目前在一线有索拉非尼和仑伐替尼,二线有 regorafenib、cabozantinib、ramucirumab(AFP 400μg/L)、pembrolizumab 和 nivolumab。单药治疗的可能性已经耗尽。发现血管生成抑制剂的协同作用,将冷肿瘤转化为热肿瘤,并促进抗 PD-1/抗 PDL-1 抗体的疗效,这导致了一种非常有效的联合治疗。在 IMbrave150 研究中,与索拉非尼一线治疗相比,atezolizumab 和 bevacizumab 的联合治疗成功应用。目前正在进行其他研究,将其他酪氨酸激酶抑制剂——regorafenib、lenvatinib 和 cabozantinib——与 nivolumab、ipilimumab 和 pembrolizumab 联合使用。这种在所有阶段的治疗进展唤起了人们迫切需要寻找一种合适的方法来寻找 HCC 的早期阶段,并为最适合的治疗方法为患者选择建立一个更有效的系统。