• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾移植候选者的性别、种族和社交网络规模是否会影响活体供者的请求数量?肾移植等待名单患者的多中心社交网络分析。

Does Sex, Race, and the Size of a Kidney Transplant Candidate's Social Network Affect the Number of Living Donor Requests? A Multicenter Social Network Analysis of Patients on the Kidney Transplant Waitlist.

机构信息

Division of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Kidney Transplantation, Department of Medicine, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.

Department of Social & Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.

出版信息

Transplantation. 2020 Dec;104(12):2632-2641. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003167.

DOI:10.1097/TP.0000000000003167
PMID:33214495
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8855970/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A kidney transplant candidate's social network serves as a pool of potential living donors. Sex and racial differences in network size, network strength, and living donor requests may contribute to disparities in living donor kidney transplantation.

METHODS

In this multicenter cross-sectional study, we performed an egocentric network analysis via a telephone survey of 132 waitlisted candidates (53% female and 69% Black) to identify demographic and network factors associated with requesting living kidney donations.

RESULTS

Female participants made requests to more network members than male participants: incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.24-3.06], P < 0.01. Black participants tended to make more requests than whites (IRR 1.65, 95% CI [0.99-2.73], P = 0.05). The number of requests increased with the size of the network (IRR 1.09, 95% CI [1.02-1.16], P = 0.01); however, network size did not differ by sex or race. Network members who provided greater instrumental support to the candidates were most likely to receive a request: odds ratio 1.39, 95% CI [1.08-1.78], P = 0.01.

CONCLUSIONS

Transplant candidates' networks vary in size and in the number of requests made to the members. Previously observed racial and sex disparities in living donor kidney transplantation do not appear to be related to network size or to living donation requests, but rather to the network members themselves. Future living donor interventions should focus on the network members and be tailored to their relationship with the candidate.

摘要

背景

肾移植候选人的社交网络是潜在活体供者的蓄水池。网络规模、网络强度以及活体供者请求方面的性别和种族差异,可能导致活体供肾移植的差异。

方法

在这项多中心横断面研究中,我们通过电话调查对 132 名候补者(53%为女性,69%为黑人)进行了个体中心网络分析,以确定与请求活体肾脏捐赠相关的人口统计学和网络因素。

结果

女性参与者向比男性参与者更多的网络成员提出请求:发病率比(IRR)1.95,95%置信区间(CI)[1.24-3.06],P<0.01。黑人参与者比白人参与者更倾向于提出更多的请求(IRR 1.65,95%CI[0.99-2.73],P=0.05)。请求的数量随网络规模的增加而增加(IRR 1.09,95%CI[1.02-1.16],P=0.01);然而,网络规模在性别或种族之间没有差异。向候选者提供更多工具性支持的网络成员最有可能收到请求:比值比 1.39,95%CI[1.08-1.78],P=0.01。

结论

候选者的网络在规模和向成员提出的请求数量上存在差异。先前观察到的活体供肾移植中的种族和性别差异似乎与网络规模或活体供者请求无关,而是与网络成员本身有关。未来的活体供者干预措施应侧重于网络成员,并根据他们与候选者的关系进行调整。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af9f/8855970/ced54f2a7710/nihms-1698039-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af9f/8855970/6350332939e7/nihms-1698039-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af9f/8855970/a9d5a2e83d45/nihms-1698039-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af9f/8855970/ced54f2a7710/nihms-1698039-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af9f/8855970/6350332939e7/nihms-1698039-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af9f/8855970/a9d5a2e83d45/nihms-1698039-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af9f/8855970/ced54f2a7710/nihms-1698039-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Does Sex, Race, and the Size of a Kidney Transplant Candidate's Social Network Affect the Number of Living Donor Requests? A Multicenter Social Network Analysis of Patients on the Kidney Transplant Waitlist.肾移植候选者的性别、种族和社交网络规模是否会影响活体供者的请求数量?肾移植等待名单患者的多中心社交网络分析。
Transplantation. 2020 Dec;104(12):2632-2641. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003167.
2
Social network interventions to reduce race disparities in living kidney donation: Design and rationale of the friends and family of kidney transplant patients study (FFKTPS).社会网络干预措施减少活体肾脏捐赠中的种族差异:肾移植患者朋友和家人研究(FFKTPS)的设计和原理。
Clin Transplant. 2023 Oct;37(10):e15064. doi: 10.1111/ctr.15064. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
3
Sex differences and attitudes toward living donor kidney transplantation among urban black patients on hemodialysis.血液透析的城市黑人患者中性别差异及对活体供肾移植的态度
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Oct 7;9(10):1764-72. doi: 10.2215/CJN.12531213. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
4
Evaluation of Kidney Donors: Core Curriculum 2018.《肾脏供体评估:2018 年核心课程》
Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 May;71(5):737-747. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.10.018. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
5
Social Determinants of Health and Race Disparities in Kidney Transplant.健康的社会决定因素与肾脏移植中的种族差异
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021 Feb 8;16(2):262-274. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04860420. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
6
Racial disparities in preemptive referral for kidney transplantation in Georgia.佐治亚州肾脏移植预先转诊中的种族差异。
Clin Transplant. 2018 Sep;32(9):e13380. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13380. Epub 2018 Aug 26.
7
Testing the Differential Access Hypothesis That Black Kidney Transplant Candidates Perceive Social Network Access to Fewer Potential Living Donors Than White Candidates.测试差异获取假设:黑人肾移植候选人感知到的潜在活体供体比白人候选人少。
Prog Transplant. 2023 Jun;33(2):130-140. doi: 10.1177/15269248231164174. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
8
Does Whom Patients Sit Next to during Hemodialysis Affect Whether They Request a Living Donation?患者在血液透析时身旁坐的是谁会影响他们是否要求活体捐献吗?
Kidney360. 2021 Jan 15;2(3):507-518. doi: 10.34067/KID.0006682020. eCollection 2021 Mar 25.
9
Racial differences in completion of the living kidney donor evaluation process.种族差异对完成活体肾捐献者评估过程的影响。
Clin Transplant. 2018 Jul;32(7):e13291. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13291. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
10
The Determinants and Consequences of Living Donor Discussion Direction.供者讨论方向的决定因素及其后果
Prog Transplant. 2023 Dec;33(4):310-317. doi: 10.1177/15269248231212913. Epub 2023 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Roles, Relationships, Resources, and Renal Exchange: Applying Social Capital Theory to Role Effects on Living Kidney Donation Behaviors.角色、关系、资源与肾脏交换:将社会资本理论应用于角色对活体肾捐赠行为的影响
Socius. 2023 Jan-Dec;9. doi: 10.1177/23780231231171097. Epub 2023 Jun 18.
2
Intersectional race and gender disparities in kidney transplant access in the United States: a scoping review.美国肾脏移植获取方面的交叉性种族与性别差异:一项范围综述
BMC Nephrol. 2024 Jan 25;25(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12882-023-03453-2.
3
Relationship of Social Deprivation Among Living Kidney Donor-Recipient Pairs.

本文引用的文献

1
Together We Can Improve Outcomes in Kidney Failure: Examining Social Networks in Hemodialysis.我们携手可改善肾衰竭治疗效果:透析患者社交网络研究
Kidney Med. 2019 May 13;1(3):79-82. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2019.05.002. eCollection 2019 May-Jun.
2
Racial differences in completion of the living kidney donor evaluation process.种族差异对完成活体肾捐献者评估过程的影响。
Clin Transplant. 2018 Jul;32(7):e13291. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13291. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
3
OPTN/SRTR 2016 Annual Data Report: Kidney.OPTN/SRTR 2016 年度数据报告:肾脏。
活体肾供受者对之间的社会剥夺关系。
Transplant Direct. 2023 Dec 12;10(1):e1559. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001559. eCollection 2024 Jan.
4
Expanding Access to Living Donor Kidney Transplants Through Social Networks.通过社交网络扩大活体供肾移植的可及性。
Kidney Med. 2023 May 6;5(6):100654. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2023.100654. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
Dialysis Patients' Social Networks and Living Donation Offers.透析患者的社交网络与活体捐赠提议
Kidney Med. 2023 Apr 15;5(6):100640. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2023.100640. eCollection 2023 Jun.
6
The ties that transplant: The social capital determinants of the living kidney donor relationship distribution.移植的纽带:活体肾脏捐赠者关系分配的社会资本决定因素。
Soc Sci Res. 2023 Jul;113:102888. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2023.102888. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
7
Reviewing Racial Disparities in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: a Socioecological Approach.审查活体供肾移植中的种族差异:一种社会生态学方法。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Apr;11(2):928-937. doi: 10.1007/s40615-023-01573-x. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
8
Utilizing Social Media to Identify Potential Living Donors: Learning from US Living Donor Programs.利用社交媒体识别潜在活体捐赠者:借鉴美国活体捐赠者项目的经验
Curr Transplant Rep. 2022;9(4):318-327. doi: 10.1007/s40472-022-00382-1. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
9
Greater community vulnerability is associated with poor living donor navigator program fidelity.社区脆弱性越大,与不良的活体供者招募员计划一致性相关。
Surgery. 2022 Sep;172(3):997-1004. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.04.033. Epub 2022 Jul 10.
10
Impact of having potential living donors on ethnic/racial disparities in access to kidney transplantation.潜在活体供者对获取肾移植机会的种族/民族差异的影响。
Am J Transplant. 2022 Oct;22(10):2433-2442. doi: 10.1111/ajt.17090. Epub 2022 May 24.
Am J Transplant. 2018 Jan;18 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):18-113. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14557.
4
A Scoping Review for Strategies to Increase Living Kidney Donation.增加活体肾脏捐献策略的范围综述。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Sep 7;12(9):1518-1527. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01470217. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
5
Pregnancy-Induced Sensitization Promotes Sex Disparity in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation.妊娠诱导的致敏作用促进活体供肾移植中的性别差异。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Oct;28(10):3025-3033. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016101059. Epub 2017 May 8.
6
Communicating About Choices in Transplantation (COACH).移植选择沟通(COACH)。
Prog Transplant. 2017 Mar;27(1):31-38. doi: 10.1177/1526924816679844. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
7
Predictors and Moderators of Educational Interventions to Increase the Likelihood of Potential Living Donors for Black Patients Awaiting Kidney Transplantation.增加等待肾移植的黑人患者潜在活体供体可能性的教育干预措施的预测因素和调节因素。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2016 Sep 8. doi: 10.1007/s40615-016-0286-0.
8
A Smartphone App for Increasing Live Organ Donation.智能手机应用程序提高活体器官捐献
Am J Transplant. 2016 Dec;16(12):3548-3553. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13961. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
9
Multiple imputation methods for bivariate outcomes in cluster randomised trials.整群随机试验中双变量结局的多重填补方法。
Stat Med. 2016 Sep 10;35(20):3482-96. doi: 10.1002/sim.6935. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
10
Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: Overcoming Disparities in Live Kidney Donation in the US--Recommendations from a Consensus Conference.活体供肾移植:克服美国活体肾捐献中的差异——共识会议建议
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Sep 4;10(9):1687-95. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00700115. Epub 2015 Apr 16.