Featherstone Mark
Sociology, Keele University, Keele, ST55BG Staffordshire UK.
Int J Semiot Law. 2020;33(2):409-431. doi: 10.1007/s11196-020-09715-8. Epub 2020 May 12.
The objective of this article is to explore the value of psychoanalysis in the early twenty-first century through reference to Freud, Lacan, and Stiegler's work on computational madness. In the first section of the article I consider the original objectives of psychoanalysis through reference to what I call Freud's 'normalisation project', before exploring the critique of this discourse concerned with the defence of oedipal law through a discussion of the post-modern 'individualisation project' set out by Deleuze and Guattari and others. Tracking the development of 'the individualisation project' in history, I consider its connections with the cybernetic theories of Wiener and Shannon in the psycho-cyber-utopianism of the 1990s, before moving on to consider the other side of the psychoanalytic-cybernetic interaction through a discussion of Jacques Lacan's rereading of Freud's in the second section of the article. In reading Lacan's seminar on Freudian drive in terms of the cybernetic repression of death, I set up the conclusion to the article which involves a discussion of Bernard Stiegler's 'survival project' that relies on a recognition of the limit of death in order to produce human significance and oppose the madness of our contemporary computational reality.
本文的目的是通过参考弗洛伊德、拉康以及斯蒂格勒关于计算性疯狂的著作,探讨精神分析在21世纪初的价值。在文章的第一部分,我通过参考我所称的弗洛伊德的“规范化计划”来考量精神分析的最初目标,之后通过讨论德勒兹、加塔利等人提出的后现代“个体化计划”,探究对这种通过捍卫俄狄浦斯法则的话语的批判。追溯历史上“个体化计划”的发展,我考量了它在20世纪90年代精神分析-控制论乌托邦主义中与维纳和香农的控制论理论的联系,然后在文章的第二部分通过讨论雅克·拉康对弗洛伊德著作的重新解读,进而考量精神分析-控制论互动的另一面。在从控制论对死亡的压抑角度解读拉康关于弗洛伊德驱力的研讨班时,我得出了文章的结论,其中涉及对贝尔纳·斯蒂格勒“生存计划”的讨论,该计划依赖于对死亡限度的认识,以产生人类意义并对抗我们当代计算现实的疯狂。