Arslanoglu Sertac, Boquien Clair-Yves, King Caroline, Lamireau Delphine, Tonetto Paola, Barnett Debbie, Bertino Enrico, Gaya Antoni, Gebauer Corinna, Grovslien Anne, Moro Guido E, Weaver Gillian, Wesolowska Aleksandra Maria, Picaud Jean-Charles
Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey.
PhAN, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Université de Nantes, CRNH-Ouest, Nantes, France.
Front Pediatr. 2019 Mar 22;7:76. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00076. eCollection 2019.
Evidence indicates that human milk (HM) is the best form of nutrition uniquely suited not only to term but also to preterm infants conferring health benefits in both the short and long-term. However, HM does not provide sufficient nutrition for the very low birth weight (VLBW) infant when fed at the usual feeding volumes leading to slow growth with the risk of neurocognitive impairment and other poor health outcomes such as retinopathy and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. HM should be supplemented (fortified) with the nutrients in short supply, particularly with protein, calcium, and phosphate to meet the high requirements of this group of babies. In this paper the European Milk Bank Association (EMBA) Working Group on HM Fortification discusses the existing evidence in this field, gives an overview of different fortification approaches and definitions, outlines the gaps in knowledge and gives recommendations for practice and suggestions for future research. EMBA recognizes that "Standard Fortification," which is currently the most utilized regimen in neonatal intensive care units, still falls short in supplying sufficient protein for some VLBW infants. EMBA encourages the use of "Individualized Fortification" to optimize nutrient intake. "Adjustable Fortification" and "Targeted Fortification" are 2 methods of individualized fortification. The quality and source of human milk fortifiers constitute another important topic. There is work looking at human milk derived fortifiers, but it is still too early to draw precise conclusions about their use. The pros and cons are discussed in this Commentary in addition to the evidence around use of fortifiers post discharge.
有证据表明,母乳是最适合婴儿的营养形式,不仅适合足月儿,也适合早产儿,无论短期还是长期都有益健康。然而,对于极低出生体重(VLBW)婴儿,按常规喂养量喂食母乳时,无法提供足够营养,导致生长缓慢,存在神经认知障碍风险以及其他不良健康后果,如视网膜病变和支气管肺发育不良。应给母乳补充(强化)供应不足的营养素,尤其是蛋白质、钙和磷,以满足这类婴儿的高营养需求。本文中,欧洲母乳库协会(EMBA)母乳强化工作组讨论了该领域的现有证据,概述了不同的强化方法和定义,列出了知识空白,并给出了实践建议和未来研究方向。EMBA认识到,“标准强化”目前是新生儿重症监护病房最常用的方案,但对一些极低出生体重婴儿来说,在提供足够蛋白质方面仍有不足。EMBA鼓励使用“个性化强化”来优化营养摄入。“可调整强化”和“靶向强化”是个性化强化的两种方法。母乳强化剂的质量和来源是另一个重要话题。目前有关于源自母乳的强化剂的研究,但就其使用得出确切结论还为时过早。本述评除了讨论出院后使用强化剂的证据外,还探讨了其利弊。