Premkumar Muralidhar H, Pammi Mohan, Suresh Gautham
Baylor College of Medicine, Section of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Houston, Texas, USA.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 7;2019(11):CD013145. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013145.pub2.
Preterm infants who are fed breast milk in comparison to infant formula have decreased morbidity such as necrotizing enterocolitis. Multi-nutrient fortifiers used to increase the nutritional content of the breast milk are commonly derived from bovine milk. Human milk-derived multi-nutrient fortifier is now available, but it is not clear if it improves outcomes in preterm infants fed with breast milk.
To determine whether the fortification of breast milk feeds with human milk-derived fortifier in preterm infants reduces mortality, morbidity, and promotes growth and development compared to bovine milk-derived fortifier.
We searched the following databases for relevant trials in September 2018. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (the Cochrane Library, Issue 9), electronic journal reference databases including MEDLINE (1980 to 20 September 2018), PREMEDLINE, Embase (1974 to 20 September 2018), CINAHL (1982 to 20 September 2018), biological abstracts in the database BIOSIS and conference abstracts from 'Proceedings First' (from 1992 to 2011). We also included the following clinical trials registries for ongoing or recently completed trials: ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov), the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP; www.whoint/ictrp/search/en/) and the ISRCTN Registry (www.isrctn.com/), and abstracts of conferences: proceedings of Pediatric Academic Societies (American Pediatric Society, Society for Pediatric Research and European Society for Paediatric Research) from 1990 in the 'Pediatric Research' journal and 'Abstracts online' (2000 to 2017).
We included randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials that compared preterm infants fed breast milk fortified with human milk-derived fortifier versus those fed with breast milk fortified with bovine milk-derived fortifier.
The data were collected using the standard methods of Cochrane Neonatal. Two authors evaluated trial quality of the studies and extracted data. We reported dichotomous data using risk ratios (RRs), risk differences (RDs), number needed to treat (NNT) where applicable, and continuous data using mean differences (MDs). We assessed the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.
One randomized trial with 127 infants met the eligibility criteria and had low risk of bias. Human milk-based fortifier did not decrease the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis in exclusively breast milk-fed preterm infants (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.2 to 4.54; 1 study, 125 infants, low certainty of evidence). Human milk-derived fortifiers did not improve growth, decrease feeding intolerance, late-onset sepsis, or death.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence evaluating human milk-derived fortifier with bovine milk-derived fortifier in exclusively breast milk-fed preterm infants. Low-certainty evidence from one study suggests that in exclusively breast milk-fed preterm infants human milk-derived fortifiers in comparison with bovine milk-derived fortifier may not change the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis, mortality, feeding intolerance, infection, or improve growth. Well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate short-term and long-term outcomes.
与婴儿配方奶粉相比,早产婴儿喂养母乳可降低坏死性小肠结肠炎等发病率。用于增加母乳营养成分的多种营养素强化剂通常来源于牛乳。目前已有源自人乳的多种营养素强化剂,但尚不清楚其能否改善以母乳喂养的早产婴儿的预后。
与源自牛乳的强化剂相比,确定在早产婴儿的母乳喂养中添加源自人乳的强化剂是否可降低死亡率、发病率,并促进生长发育。
我们于2018年9月检索了以下数据库中的相关试验。Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)(Cochrane图书馆,第9期)、电子期刊参考文献数据库,包括MEDLINE(1980年至2018年9月20日)、PREMEDLINE、Embase(1974年至2018年9月20日)、CINAHL(1982年至2018年9月20日)、BIOSIS数据库中的生物学文摘以及“Proceedings First”(1992年至2011年)的会议摘要。我们还纳入了以下临床试验注册库中正在进行或最近完成的试验:ClinicalTrials.gov(ClinicalTrials.gov)、世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台(WHO ICTRP;www.who.int/ictrp/search/en/)和ISRCTN注册库(www.isrctn.com/),以及会议摘要:1990年起发表于《儿科研究》杂志和“在线摘要”(2000年至2017年)中的儿科学术协会(美国儿科学会、儿科研究学会和欧洲儿科学会)会议论文集。
我们纳入了随机和半随机对照试验,这些试验比较了以源自人乳的强化剂强化母乳喂养的早产婴儿与以源自牛乳的强化剂强化母乳喂养的早产婴儿。
采用Cochrane新生儿组的标准方法收集数据。两位作者评估了研究的试验质量并提取数据。我们使用风险比(RRs)、风险差(RDs)、适用时的治疗所需人数(NNT)报告二分数据,使用均值差(MDs)报告连续数据。我们采用推荐分级的评估、制定和评价(GRADE)方法评估证据质量。
一项纳入127名婴儿的随机试验符合纳入标准且偏倚风险较低。基于人乳的强化剂并未降低纯母乳喂养的早产婴儿患坏死性小肠结肠炎的风险(RR 0.95,95% CI 0.2至4.54;1项研究,125名婴儿,证据确定性低)。源自人乳的强化剂未改善生长情况、未降低喂养不耐受、迟发性败血症或死亡率。
在纯母乳喂养的早产婴儿中,评估源自人乳的强化剂与源自牛乳的强化剂的证据不足。一项研究的低确定性证据表明,在纯母乳喂养的早产婴儿中,与源自牛乳的强化剂相比,源自人乳的强化剂可能不会改变坏死性小肠结肠炎的风险、死亡率、喂养不耐受、感染情况或改善生长。需要设计良好的随机对照试验来评估短期和长期结局。