• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性阑尾炎计算机辅助诊断评分系统。前瞻性研究与回顾性研究的价值。

Scoring system for computer-aided diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The value of prospective versus retrospective studies.

作者信息

Arnbjörnsson E

出版信息

Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1985;74(4):159-66.

PMID:3909908
Abstract

The high negative exploration rate in patients with suspected acute appendicitis is the main compelling reason to improve the accuracy in managing patients with acute abdominal pain. In this article, data from a prospective study on a group of patients undergoing an acute appendectomy were used to devise a scoring system for the purpose of differentiating between the patients with an acute appendicitis and those found to have a normal appendix at operation. The results show that by using the scoring system described, 30% of the unnecessary appendectomies could have been avoided. These findings show the potential value of this method. The results of the prospective study were compared with the results of a retrospective study on the same group of patients demonstrating a significant difference and hence the unreliability of retrospective studies.

摘要

疑似急性阑尾炎患者的高阴性探查率是提高急性腹痛患者管理准确性的主要迫切原因。在本文中,一组接受急性阑尾切除术患者的前瞻性研究数据被用于设计一个评分系统,目的是区分患有急性阑尾炎的患者和手术中发现阑尾正常的患者。结果显示,通过使用所描述的评分系统,30%的不必要阑尾切除术本可避免。这些发现表明了该方法的潜在价值。将该前瞻性研究的结果与对同一组患者的回顾性研究结果进行比较,显示出显著差异,因此回顾性研究不可靠。

相似文献

1
Scoring system for computer-aided diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The value of prospective versus retrospective studies.急性阑尾炎计算机辅助诊断评分系统。前瞻性研究与回顾性研究的价值。
Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1985;74(4):159-66.
2
Routine use of a scoring system for decision-making in suspected acute appendicitis in adults.在疑似成人急性阑尾炎的决策中常规使用评分系统。
Acta Chir Scand. 1987 Sep;153(9):545-51.
3
The use of white blood cell count and left shift in the diagnosis of appendicitis in children.白细胞计数及核左移在儿童阑尾炎诊断中的应用。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007 Feb;23(2):69-76. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31802d1716.
4
[Can diagnostic scoring systems help decision making in primary care of patients with suspected acute appendicitis?].[诊断评分系统能否有助于疑似急性阑尾炎患者的基层医疗决策?]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1999 May 7;124(18):545-50. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1024357.
5
Laparoscopic appendectomies: results of a monocentric prospective and non-randomized study.腹腔镜阑尾切除术:一项单中心前瞻性非随机研究的结果
Hepatogastroenterology. 2007 Jun;54(76):1146-52.
6
[Acute appendicitis at the National University Hospital in Bangui, Central African Republic: epidemiologic, clinical, paraclinical and therapeutic aspects].[中非共和国班吉国立大学医院的急性阑尾炎:流行病学、临床、辅助检查及治疗方面]
Sante. 2001 Apr-Jun;11(2):117-25.
7
A feasibility study of computer aided diagnosis in appendicitis.阑尾炎计算机辅助诊断的可行性研究。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982 Nov;155(5):685-8.
8
[Laparoscopic diagnosis in suspected acute appendicitis].
Helv Chir Acta. 1994 Jul;60(5):787-91.
9
The accuracy of C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis compared with that of clinical diagnosis.与临床诊断相比,C反应蛋白在急性阑尾炎诊断中的准确性。
Med Arh. 2000;54(2):109-10.
10
Would measurement of C-reactive protein reduce the rate of negative exploration for acute appendicitis?检测C反应蛋白会降低急性阑尾炎阴性探查率吗?
J R Coll Surg Edinb. 2000 Feb;45(1):21-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Many diagnostic tools for appendicitis: a scoping review.许多用于阑尾炎诊断的工具:范围综述。
Surg Endosc. 2023 May;37(5):3419-3429. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09890-2. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
2
Evaluation of appendicitis risk prediction models in adults with suspected appendicitis.成人疑似阑尾炎患者阑尾炎风险预测模型的评估。
Br J Surg. 2020 Jan;107(1):73-86. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11440. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
3
Diagnostic score in acute appendicitis. Validation of a diagnostic score (Lintula score) for adults with suspected appendicitis.
急性阑尾炎诊断评分。一种用于诊断疑似阑尾炎的成年人的诊断评分(Lintula 评分)的验证。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010 Jun;395(5):495-500. doi: 10.1007/s00423-010-0627-0. Epub 2010 Apr 9.
4
Appendicitis score for children with suspected appendicitis. A randomized clinical trial.疑似阑尾炎患儿的阑尾炎评分。一项随机临床试验。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2009 Nov;394(6):999-1004. doi: 10.1007/s00423-008-0425-0. Epub 2008 Oct 8.
5
Comparison of the levels of accuracy of an artificial neural network model and a logistic regression model for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.人工神经网络模型与逻辑回归模型在急性阑尾炎诊断中的准确性水平比较。
J Med Syst. 2007 Oct;31(5):357-64. doi: 10.1007/s10916-007-9077-9.
6
A new approach to accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis.一种准确诊断急性阑尾炎的新方法。
World J Surg. 2005 Sep;29(9):1151-6, discussion 1157. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-7853-6.
7
A diagnostic score for children with suspected appendicitis.疑似阑尾炎儿童的诊断评分
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2005 Apr;390(2):164-70. doi: 10.1007/s00423-005-0545-8. Epub 2005 Feb 19.
8
Diagnostic score in appendicitis. Validation of a diagnostic score (Eskelinen score) in patients in whom acute appendicitis is suspected.阑尾炎的诊断评分。对疑似急性阑尾炎患者的诊断评分(埃斯凯林评分)进行验证。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2004 Jun;389(3):213-8. doi: 10.1007/s00423-003-0436-9. Epub 2003 Nov 18.
9
Acute appendicitis: does removal of a normal appendix matter, what is the value of diagnostic accuracy and is surgical delay important?急性阑尾炎:切除正常阑尾有影响吗?诊断准确性的价值是什么?手术延迟重要吗?
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1995 Sep;77(5):358-63.