Suppr超能文献

患者门户访问和使用的障碍:来自健康信息国家趋势调查的证据。

Barriers to Patient Portal Access and Use: Evidence from the Health Information National Trends Survey.

机构信息

From the Division of Intramural Research, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (SET); Division of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (SET, AM); School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis (AM); School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (SC); Division of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (EJPS); Office of the Director, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, Bethesda, MD (EJPS).

出版信息

J Am Board Fam Med. 2020 Nov-Dec;33(6):953-968. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.06.190402.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient access to their medical records through patient portals (PPs) facilitates information exchange and provision of quality health care. Understanding factors that characterize patients with limited access to and use of PPs is needed.

METHODS

Data were from the 2017-2018 Health Information National Trends Survey 5, Cycles 1 and 2, a nationally representative survey of US adults ≥ 18 years old (n = 6789). Weighted multivariate logistic regressions modeled the associations between patient characteristics and access to, facilitators of use, and use of PPs and their functions.

RESULTS

Individuals without (vs with) a regular doctor (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.4; CI, 0.3-0.5) or health insurance (aOR, 0.4; CI, 0.2-0.7), those with high school (aOR 0.4; CI, 0.3-0.5) or with vocational/some college (aOR, 0.5; CI, 04.-0.7) education (vs college/postgraduate), or those with limited English proficiency (vs those who speak English very well) (aOR, 0.7; CI, 0.5-0.9) were less likely to report accessing their personal medical records. Women (vs men) were more likely to report accessing their medical records (aOR, 1.5; CI, 1.2-1.8). Similar patterns were found for PPs access and facilitators of use. Less consistent associations emerged between patient characteristics and use of PP functionalities.

CONCLUSIONS

PP access and use are low. Having a primary care clinician, patient's educational attainment, and being a woman were factors associated with PP access and use, but not race/ethnicity. Once access was achieved, use of PP functionalities was generally uniform across demographic segments. Facilitating PP access and use among all patient populations is warranted.

摘要

背景

患者通过患者门户(PP)访问其病历,有助于信息交流和提供高质量的医疗保健。需要了解限制患者访问和使用 PP 的因素。

方法

数据来自 2017-2018 年健康信息国家趋势调查 5 号,循环 1 和 2,这是一项针对美国≥18 岁成年人的全国代表性调查(n=6789)。加权多变量逻辑回归模型分析了患者特征与访问、使用促进因素以及使用 PP 及其功能之间的关联。

结果

与有固定医生(调整后的优势比 [aOR],0.4;95%置信区间 [CI],0.3-0.5)或医疗保险(aOR,0.4;CI,0.2-0.7)的个体相比,没有固定医生或医疗保险的个体(aOR,0.4;CI,0.3-0.5),高中(aOR,0.4;CI,0.3-0.5)或职业/大专(aOR,0.5;CI,0.4-0.7)教育程度(与大学/研究生相比),或英语水平有限(与英语非常好的人相比)(aOR,0.7;CI,0.5-0.9)的个体不太可能报告访问个人医疗记录。女性(与男性相比)更有可能报告访问其医疗记录(aOR,1.5;CI,1.2-1.8)。PP 访问和使用促进因素也存在类似的模式。患者特征与 PP 功能的使用之间存在不太一致的关联。

结论

PP 的访问和使用率较低。拥有初级保健临床医生、患者的教育程度和女性是与 PP 访问和使用相关的因素,但与种族/族裔无关。一旦获得访问权限,PP 功能的使用在各个人口统计群体中通常是一致的。有必要促进所有患者群体对 PP 的访问和使用。

相似文献

1
Barriers to Patient Portal Access and Use: Evidence from the Health Information National Trends Survey.
J Am Board Fam Med. 2020 Nov-Dec;33(6):953-968. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.06.190402.
3
Progress and Persistent Disparities in Patient Access to Electronic Health Information.
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Nov 3;4(11):e233883. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.3883.
5
Use of provider-sponsored patient portals among older adults and their family caregivers.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Apr;71(4):1177-1187. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18187. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
6
Determinants of Use of the Care Information Exchange Portal: Cross-sectional Study.
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Nov 11;23(11):e23481. doi: 10.2196/23481.
8
Patient-centered communication, disparities, and patient portals in the US, 2017-2022.
Am J Manag Care. 2024 Jan;30(1):19-25. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2024.89483.
10
Disparities in Patient Portal Engagement Among Patients With Hypertension Treated in Primary Care.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2411649. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.11649.

引用本文的文献

2
Virtual Care Among Adults Facing Language Barriers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2513906. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.13906.
4
Patient-facing chatbots: Enhancing healthcare accessibility while navigating digital literacy challenges and isolation risks-a mixed-methods study.
Digit Health. 2025 Apr 28;11:20552076251337321. doi: 10.1177/20552076251337321. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
5
New Horizons for Consumer-Mediated Health Information Exchange.
Yearb Med Inform. 2024 Aug;33(1):179-190. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1800741. Epub 2025 Apr 8.
7
Social risk factors screening preferences among breast and prostate cancer survivors: A qualitative study.
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2025 Feb 13:1-19. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2025.2463389.
9
Discussions of Cannabis Over Patient Portal Secure Messaging: Content Analysis.
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 12;26:e63311. doi: 10.2196/63311.
10
Patterns of digital health access and use among US adults: A latent class analysis.
BMC Digit Health. 2024;2(1). doi: 10.1186/s44247-024-00100-0. Epub 2024 Jul 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Are Patients Electronically Accessing Their Medical Records? Evidence From National Hospital Data.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Nov;38(11):1850-1857. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05437.
2
Who Isn't Using Patient Portals And Why? Evidence And Implications From A National Sample Of US Adults.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Dec;37(12):1948-1954. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05117.
3
Association between Having a Regular Health Provider and Access to Services Linked to Electronic Health Records.
Hosp Top. 2019 Jan;97(1):1-10. doi: 10.1080/00185868.2018.1551102. Epub 2018 Dec 31.
4
Communicating with diverse patients: How patient and clinician factors affect disparities.
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Dec;101(12):2186-2194. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.08.021. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
5
Electronic health record adoption in US hospitals: the emergence of a digital "advanced use" divide.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Nov 1;24(6):1142-1148. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx080.
6
HITECH Act Drove Large Gains In Hospital Electronic Health Record Adoption.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Aug 1;36(8):1416-1422. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1651.
7
Patient-Perceived Facilitators of and Barriers to Electronic Portal Use: A Systematic Review.
Comput Inform Nurs. 2017 Nov;35(11):565-573. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000377.
8
Personal Health Records: A Systematic Literature Review.
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jan 6;19(1):e13. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5876.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验