University of Bonn, INRES - Horticultural Science, Auf dem Hügel 6, 53121, Bonn, Germany.
J Environ Manage. 2021 Jan 15;278(Pt 1):111453. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111453. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
I) BACKGROUND: Carbon footprint studies of locally produced and consumed wine are missing. II) PURPOSE(S): The objective of the present study was to identify management strategies and carbon reduction potentials for a sustainable wine production based on the carbon footprint and the water footprint of locally grown grapes and wine locally produced and consumed. III) METHODS: Two wineries (A and B) were investigated, both of which grow the same white (Riesling) and the same red grape (Pinot Noir/Spätburgunder) on the same rootstock in the Rhine river valley of Germany. The study was based on PAS 2050-1 (BSI) and comprised 99% primary data derived from historical farm records. System boundaries ranged from planting of the grapevines to eventual disposal of a typical 0.75 L glass bottle, which served as the functional unit (FU). IV) RESULTS: The product carbon footprint (PCF) was 1.91 ± 0.3 kg COeq/bottle (A) or 1.69 ± 0.3 (B) kg COeq/bottle of white wine and 1.86 ± 0.3 kg COeq/bottle of red wine for both wineries. These results were attributed to the consumer behaviour (22-30%), followed by the use and production of glass bottles (20-27%). Grapevine cultivation amounted to 0.3-0.4 kg COeq/bottle; grape processing caused ca. 0.05-0.06 kg COeq/bottle, packaging 0.5-0.6 kg COeq/bottle, distribution 0.2-0.4 kg COeq/bottle, while use and disposal of the glass bottles emitted 0.5-0.6 kg COeq/bottle. The plant protection chemicals caused only ca. 1.4% and organic fertilizer ca. 2.8% of the product carbon footprint (PCF). Red and white wine appeared commensurate in their PCF within 3-8% in both vineyards. The water footprint was ca. 5.7 ± 0.6 (A) and 2.1 ± 0.4 (B) L blue water/bottle for both red and white wine. V) DISCUSSION: The results are discussed with higher carbon footprint values for wine from overseas. We have identified the following reduction potentials such as the following management strategies: VI) RECOMMENDATIONS: a) reduction of fossil fuels for gas heating of the premises and for farm vehicles, b) the use of lightweight glass bottles and c) alternative means of transport for the consumer purchase at the winery when using a private vehicle.
一、背景:目前缺乏对本地生产和消费的葡萄酒的碳足迹研究。二、目的:本研究的目的是基于本地种植的葡萄和本地生产和消费的葡萄酒的碳足迹和水足迹,确定可持续葡萄酒生产的管理策略和减排潜力。三、方法:研究了两家酒厂(A 和 B),它们都在德国莱茵河谷的同一砧木上种植相同的白葡萄(雷司令)和红葡萄(黑比诺/斯贝博贡德)。该研究基于 PAS 2050-1(BSI),包含 99%源自历史农场记录的原始数据。系统边界从种植葡萄到最终处理典型的 0.75 升玻璃瓶,该玻璃瓶作为功能单元(FU)。四、结果:A 厂和 B 厂的白葡萄酒和红葡萄酒的产品碳足迹(PCF)分别为 1.91±0.3kg COeq/瓶和 1.69±0.3kg COeq/瓶。这些结果归因于消费者行为(22-30%),其次是玻璃瓶的使用和生产(20-27%)。葡萄栽培量为 0.3-0.4kg COeq/瓶;葡萄加工造成约 0.05-0.06kg COeq/瓶,包装造成 0.5-0.6kg COeq/瓶,分配造成 0.2-0.4kg COeq/瓶,而玻璃瓶的使用和处置排放 0.5-0.6kg COeq/瓶。植物保护化学品仅造成产品碳足迹(PCF)的约 1.4%,有机肥造成约 2.8%。两个葡萄园的红白葡萄酒的 PCF 相差 3-8%。红葡萄酒和白葡萄酒的水足迹分别约为 5.7±0.6(A)和 2.1±0.4(B)升蓝水/瓶。五、讨论:我们讨论了海外葡萄酒的碳足迹值较高的情况。我们确定了以下减排潜力和管理策略:六、建议:a)减少用于场地燃气加热和农场车辆的化石燃料,b)使用轻质玻璃瓶,c)当消费者使用私人车辆在酒庄购买时,使用替代运输方式。