• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学校卫生中心提供避孕植入物:成本效益分析。

Provision of contraceptive implants in school-based health centers: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stamford Hospital, Stamford, CT, United States.

Division of Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.

出版信息

Contraception. 2021 Feb;103(2):107-112. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.11.009. Epub 2020 Nov 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2020.11.009
PMID:33221276
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of providing contraceptive implants in school-based health centers (SBHCs) compared to the practice of referring adolescents to non-SBHCs in New York City.

STUDY DESIGN

We developed a microsimulation model of teen pregnancy to estimate the cost-effectiveness of immediate provision of contraceptive implants at SBHCs over a 3-year time horizon. Model parameters were derived from both a retrospective chart review of patient data and published literature. The model projected the number of pregnancies as well as the total costs for each intervention scenario. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated using the public payer perspective, using direct costs only.

RESULTS

The health care cost of immediate provision of contraceptive implants at SBHCs was projected to be $13,719 per person compared to $13,567 per person for delayed provision at the referral appointment over 3 years. However, immediate provision would prevent 78 more pregnancies per 1000 adolescents over 3 years. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for implementing in-school provision was $1940 per additional pregnancy prevented, which was less than the $4206.41 willingness-to-pay threshold. Sensitivity analyses showed that the cost-effectiveness conclusion was robust over a wide range of key model inputs.

CONCLUSION

Provision of contraceptive implants in SBHCs compared to non-SBHCs is cost-effective for preventing unintended teen pregnancy. Health care providers and policymakers should consider expanding this model of patient-centered health care delivery to other locations.

摘要

目的

评估在纽约市的学校保健中心(SBHC)提供避孕植入物与将青少年转介到非 SBHC 的做法相比的成本效益。

研究设计

我们开发了一个青少年怀孕的微观模拟模型,以估计在 SBHC 中立即提供避孕植入物在 3 年时间内的成本效益。模型参数来自对患者数据的回顾性图表审查和已发表的文献。该模型预测了每种干预方案的怀孕数量和总成本。使用公共支付方视角,仅使用直接成本计算增量成本效益比。

结果

在 3 年内,与在转诊预约时延迟提供相比,在 SBHC 中立即提供避孕植入物的医疗保健成本预计为每人 13719 美元,而每人 13567 美元。然而,立即提供将在 3 年内预防每 1000 名青少年中增加 78 例怀孕。实施校内提供的增量成本效益比为每预防一次额外怀孕 1940 美元,低于 4206.41 美元的支付意愿阈值。敏感性分析表明,在广泛的关键模型输入范围内,成本效益结论是稳健的。

结论

与非 SBHC 相比,在 SBHC 中提供避孕植入物在预防意外青少年怀孕方面具有成本效益。医疗保健提供者和政策制定者应考虑将这种以患者为中心的医疗保健提供模式扩展到其他地点。

相似文献

1
Provision of contraceptive implants in school-based health centers: A cost-effectiveness analysis.学校卫生中心提供避孕植入物:成本效益分析。
Contraception. 2021 Feb;103(2):107-112. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.11.009. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
2
Contraceptive provision in Oregon school-based health centers: Method type trends and the role of Title X.俄勒冈州校医院的避孕措施提供情况:方法类型趋势和《Title X 法案》的作用。
Contraception. 2021 Aug;104(2):206-210. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.03.020. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
3
A comparison of contraceptive services for adolescents at school-based versus community health centers in Oregon.俄勒冈州校办卫生中心与社区卫生中心提供的青少年避孕服务比较。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb;57(1):145-151. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13889. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
4
Reproductive health in school-based health centers: findings from the 1998-99 census of school-based health centers.学校健康中心的生殖健康:1998 - 1999年学校健康中心普查结果
J Adolesc Health. 2003 Jun;32(6):443-51. doi: 10.1016/s1054-139x(03)00063-6.
5
A Mobile Health Contraception Decision Support Intervention for Latina Adolescents: Implementation Evaluation for Use in School-Based Health Centers.移动健康避孕决策支持干预措施在拉丁裔青少年中的应用:在学校健康中心的使用实施评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Mar 14;7(3):e11163. doi: 10.2196/11163.
6
Cost-Effectiveness of Immediate Compared With Delayed Postpartum Etonogestrel Implant Insertion.产后立即植入与延迟植入依托孕烯植入剂的成本效益比较
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;126(1):47-55. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000907.
7
Provision of Contraception in New York City School-Based Health Centers: Impact on Teenage Pregnancy and Avoided Costs, 2008-2017.2008-2017 年,纽约市校医院提供避孕措施对青少年怀孕率和避免成本的影响。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2019 Dec;51(4):201-209. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12126.
8
Contraceptive services in SBHCs: A community experience in creating change.
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2011 Nov;12(4):208-14. doi: 10.1177/1527154411431967. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
9
Cost-effectiveness of emergency contraception options over 1 year.1 年内紧急避孕方案的成本效益。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 May;218(5):508.e1-508.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.01.025. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
10
Contraceptive Access Through School-Based Health Centers: Perceptions of Rural and Suburban Young People.通过校医院获取避孕措施:农村和郊区青少年的看法。
Health Promot Pract. 2022 May;23(3):425-431. doi: 10.1177/15248399211026612. Epub 2021 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of mechanical engineering innovations in biomedical advancements.机械工程创新在生物医学进步中的影响。
In Vitro Model. 2024 Jan 25;3(1):5-18. doi: 10.1007/s44164-024-00065-4. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Modeling the impact of a health coaching intervention to prevent teen pregnancy.模拟健康指导干预对预防青少年怀孕的影响。
Prev Med Rep. 2022 Jan 29;26:101716. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101716. eCollection 2022 Apr.