• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠病毒病的异质性和退行性后果:来自高质量面板数据的证据

The heterogeneous and regressive consequences of COVID-19: Evidence from high quality panel data.

作者信息

Crossley Thomas F, Fisher Paul, Low Hamish

机构信息

European University Institute, IFS, ESCoE and Understanding Society, Italy.

ISER, University of Essex and Understanding Society, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Public Econ. 2021 Jan;193:104334. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104334. Epub 2020 Nov 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104334
PMID:33223577
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7666552/
Abstract

Using new data from the first two waves of the COVID-19 Study collected in April and in May 2020 in the UK, we study the labour market shocks that individuals experienced in the first wave of the pandemic, and the steps they and their households took to cope with those shocks. is based on probability samples and the Covid-19 Study is constructed carefully to support valid population inferences. The Covid-19 Study collected novel data on the mitigation strategies that individuals and households employ. Further, prior observation of respondents in the panel allows us to characterize regressivity with respect to pre-pandemic economic positions. Our key findings are that those with precarious employment, aged under 30 and from minority ethnic groups faced the biggest labour market shocks. Almost 50% of individuals have experienced declines in household earnings of at least 10%, but declines are most severe in the bottom pre-pandemic income quintiles. Methods of mitigation vary substantially across groups: borrowing and transfers from family and friends are most prevalent among those most in need.

摘要

利用2020年4月和5月在英国收集的新冠疫情研究前两波的新数据,我们研究了个人在疫情第一波中所经历的劳动力市场冲击,以及他们及其家庭为应对这些冲击所采取的措施。该研究基于概率样本,并且新冠疫情研究经过精心构建,以支持有效的总体推断。新冠疫情研究收集了关于个人和家庭采用的缓解策略的新数据。此外,对该小组中受访者的先前观察使我们能够描述相对于疫情前经济状况的累退性。我们的主要发现是,就业不稳定、年龄在30岁以下以及来自少数族裔群体的人面临着最大的劳动力市场冲击。近50%的个人家庭收入下降了至少10%,但在疫情前收入最低的五分之一人群中,收入下降最为严重。缓解方法在不同群体之间有很大差异:向家人和朋友借款和转移是最有需要的人群中最普遍的方式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3fe/7666552/c3f4d7760644/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3fe/7666552/c3f4d7760644/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3fe/7666552/c3f4d7760644/gr1_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
The heterogeneous and regressive consequences of COVID-19: Evidence from high quality panel data.新冠病毒病的异质性和退行性后果:来自高质量面板数据的证据
J Public Econ. 2021 Jan;193:104334. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104334. Epub 2020 Nov 14.
2
Implications of COVID-19 labour market shocks for inequality in financial wellbeing.新冠疫情对劳动力市场的冲击对金融福祉不平等的影响。
J Popul Econ. 2021;34(2):655-689. doi: 10.1007/s00148-020-00821-2. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
3
Labour Market Shocks and Parental Investments during the Covid-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间的劳动力市场冲击与父母投资
Labour Econ. 2023 Jun;82:102341. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2023.102341. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
4
Adult life-course trajectories of psychological distress and economic outcomes in midlife during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from the 1958 and 1970 British birth cohorts.成年后生活轨迹中的心理困扰和中年时期在 COVID-19 大流行期间的经济状况:来自 1958 年和 1970 年英国出生队列的证据。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2023 May;58(5):779-794. doi: 10.1007/s00127-022-02377-w. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
5
Sociodemographic inequality in exposure to COVID-19-induced economic hardship in the United Kingdom.英国在接触新冠疫情引发的经济困难方面的社会人口不平等现象。
Res Soc Stratif Mobil. 2020 Oct;69:100551. doi: 10.1016/j.rssm.2020.100551. Epub 2020 Sep 6.
6
Inequality and psychological well-being in times of COVID-19: evidence from Spain.新冠疫情期间的不平等与心理健康:来自西班牙的证据
SERIEs (Berl). 2021;12(4):489-548. doi: 10.1007/s13209-021-00255-3. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
7
The Income and Consumption Effects of COVID-19 and the Role of Public Policy.新冠疫情的收入与消费影响及公共政策的作用
Fisc Stud. 2020 Dec;41(4):805-827. doi: 10.1111/1475-5890.12252. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
8
Is any job better than no job at all? Studying the relations between employment types, unemployment and subjective health in Belgium.有工作是否总比完全没有工作要好?对比利时就业类型、失业与主观健康之间的关系进行研究。
Arch Public Health. 2017 Aug 24;75:55. doi: 10.1186/s13690-017-0225-5. eCollection 2017.
9
Understanding labour market disruptions and job losses amidst COVID-19.了解新冠疫情期间劳动力市场的混乱和失业情况。
J Soc Econ Dev. 2021;23(Suppl 2):301-319. doi: 10.1007/s40847-020-00125-x. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
10
Impacts of adult illness on employment outcomes of rural households in India.印度成年人疾病对农村家庭就业结果的影响。
J Glob Health. 2018 Dec;8(2):020408. doi: 10.7189/jogh.08.020408.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in Income and Well-Being Inequality During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan.日本新冠疫情期间的收入与福祉不平等趋势
Soc Indic Res. 2024 Dec 21. doi: 10.1007/s11205-024-03478-6.
2
Productivity changes during the COVID-19 pandemic and its associated risk factors.新冠疫情期间的生产力变化及其相关风险因素。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2025 Sep 1;51(5):394-403. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4237. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
3
Resilience Among Undocumented Migrants: An Analysis of the Likelihood to Participate in a Panel Study Among Undocumented Migrants Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic.

本文引用的文献

1
The short-term economic consequences of COVID-19: Exposure to disease, remote work and government response.COVID-19 对短期经济的影响:疾病暴露、远程办公和政府应对。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 15;18(3):e0270341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270341. eCollection 2023.
2
Unequal consequences of Covid 19: representative evidence from six countries.新冠疫情的不平等后果:来自六个国家的代表性证据。
Rev Econ Househ. 2021;19(3):769-783. doi: 10.1007/s11150-021-09560-z. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
3
Early evidence of the impacts of COVID-19 on minority unemployment.
无证移民的复原力:对新冠疫情期间无证移民参与一项专题研究可能性的分析
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251324378. doi: 10.1177/00469580251324378. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
4
The "Great Lockdown" and cultural consumption in the UK.英国的“大封锁”与文化消费
J Cult Econ (Dordr). 2022 Nov 17:1-33. doi: 10.1007/s10824-022-09463-6.
5
Impact of COVID-19 Containment Measures on Unemployment: A Multi-country Analysis Using a Difference-in-Differences Framework.新冠疫情防控措施对失业率的影响:基于双重差分框架的多国分析。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7036. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7036. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
6
The economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on ethnic minorities in Manchester: lessons from the early stage of the pandemic.新冠疫情对曼彻斯特少数族裔的经济影响:疫情早期的经验教训。
Front Sociol. 2023 May 19;8:1139258. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2023.1139258. eCollection 2023.
7
The economic impacts of COVID-19 and city lockdown: Early evidence from China.新冠疫情与城市封锁的经济影响:来自中国的早期证据
Struct Chang Econ Dyn. 2023 Jun;65:151-165. doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2023.02.018. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
8
Multidimensional Deprivation from Labor Market Opportunities in Armenia: Evidence from 2018 and 2020.亚美尼亚劳动力市场机会的多维剥夺:2018年和2020年的证据
Comp Econ Stud. 2023 Feb 17:1-40. doi: 10.1057/s41294-023-00206-w.
9
Adult life-course trajectories of psychological distress and economic outcomes in midlife during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from the 1958 and 1970 British birth cohorts.成年后生活轨迹中的心理困扰和中年时期在 COVID-19 大流行期间的经济状况:来自 1958 年和 1970 年英国出生队列的证据。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2023 May;58(5):779-794. doi: 10.1007/s00127-022-02377-w. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
10
The challenge of estimating the direct and indirect effects of COVID-19 interventions - Toward an integrated economic and epidemiological approach.估算 COVID-19 干预措施的直接和间接影响的挑战 - 迈向综合经济和流行病学方法。
Econ Hum Biol. 2023 Apr;49:101198. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2022.101198. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
新冠疫情对少数族裔失业影响的早期证据。
J Public Econ. 2020 Dec;192:104287. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104287. Epub 2020 Sep 14.