Tandon Sunit, Singh Baldev, Kapoor Sudarshan, Mangal Suruchi
Department of Surgery, GMC, Amritsar, Punjab, India.
Department of Pathology, SGRD, Amritsar, Punjab, India.
Niger J Surg. 2020 Jul-Dec;26(2):122-126. doi: 10.4103/njs.NJS_14_19. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
Wound healing is a dynamic process involving tissue repair and regeneration. Nonhealing and chronic wounds are a significant health problem that many patients all over the world are suffering from. Proper wound care is hence very important. Wound dressings have undergone continuous and significant changes over the time period. Optimal dressing should ensure a moist wound bed, help drainage, remove debris, and be anti-allergic and without immunogenicity.
The objective of the study is compare the effect of pH modulation on wound healing with topical application of citric acid versus superoxide ions. The aim is to study the efficacy and safety of citric acid versus superoxide ions in the prevention and control of infection and their effect on wound healing in similar wound types.
We conducted randomized, prospective comparative study in a total of 100 patients admitted at Guru Nanak Dev Hospital, attached to Government Medical College, Amritsar. The patients were divided into two groups: Group A where wound management was done using superoxide ions and Group B where citric acid was used. A standard grading was done in terms of a decrease in wound size, an increase in granulation tissue, and a reduction in wound discharge.
The wounds treated with citric acid showed an average reduction in wound size of 73.43% by the 14 day as compared to 66.52% in the control group. The difference seen in the average reduction of wound size was statistically significant ( = 0.032). The wounds treated by citric acid application showed an average increase in granulation tissue of 56.66% as compared to 50.87% in the wounds treated by superoxide ions. The average hospital stay in patients of Group B was comparatively less than that of patients in Group A.
Citric acid is safe and effective in all types of wound management and gives better efficacy and faster response as compared to superoxide ions. Citric acid promotes wound healing by the formation of granulation tissue and fibroblast proliferation.
伤口愈合是一个涉及组织修复和再生的动态过程。难愈合和慢性伤口是一个重大的健康问题,全世界许多患者都深受其害。因此,恰当的伤口护理非常重要。随着时间的推移,伤口敷料经历了持续且重大的变革。理想的敷料应确保伤口床湿润,有助于引流,清除碎屑,且具有抗过敏和无免疫原性的特点。
本研究的目的是比较局部应用柠檬酸与超氧离子对伤口愈合的pH调节效果。旨在研究柠檬酸与超氧离子在预防和控制感染方面的疗效和安全性,以及它们对类似伤口类型伤口愈合的影响。
我们在阿姆利则政府医学院附属的古鲁·那纳克·德夫医院对总共100名住院患者进行了随机、前瞻性比较研究。患者被分为两组:A组使用超氧离子进行伤口处理,B组使用柠檬酸。根据伤口大小的减小、肉芽组织的增加和伤口渗出物的减少进行标准分级。
到第14天时,用柠檬酸处理的伤口平均伤口大小减少了73.43%,而对照组为66.52%。伤口大小平均减少的差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.032)。与用超氧离子处理的伤口相比,应用柠檬酸处理的伤口肉芽组织平均增加了56.66%,而用超氧离子处理的伤口为50.87%。B组患者的平均住院时间比A组患者相对更短。
柠檬酸在所有类型的伤口处理中都是安全有效的,与超氧离子相比,具有更好的疗效和更快的反应。柠檬酸通过肉芽组织的形成和成纤维细胞增殖促进伤口愈合。