Gold Michael H, Nestor Mark S, Berman Brian, Goldberg David
Gold Skin Care Center, 2000 Richard Jones Road, Suite 220, Nashville, TN 37215.
Center for Clinical and Cosmetic Research, 2925 NE 199th St, Suite 205, Aventura, FL 33180.
Burns Trauma. 2020 Nov 14;8:tkaa031. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkaa031. eCollection 2020.
Keloids are a fibroproliferative disorder that can result from a cutaneous injury to the reticular dermis. Recurrence rates as high as 100% have been reported following surgical excision alone. Consequently, a variety of post-surgical techniques have been employed to prevent keloid recurrence, including the use of radiation. Although numerous studies have shown post-excisional X-rays, electron beam, lasers and brachytherapy can reduce the rate of keloid recurrence, numerous inconsistencies, including a wide range of definitions for keloid recurrence, make it difficult to compare study outcomes. The review aims to examine the various means for defining keloid recurrence in clinical trials involving the use of radiation therapy. Searches of the Cochrane Library and PubMed were performed to identify the available information for post-surgical keloid recurrence following radiation therapy. Each identified study was reviewed for patient follow-up and criteria used to define keloid recurrence. The search results included clinical studies with external beam radiation, brachytherapy and superficial radiation therapy. Many studies did not include a definition of keloid recurrence, or defined recurrence only as the return of scar tissue. Other studies defined keloid recurrence based on patient self-assessment questionnaires, symptoms and scar elevation and changes in Kyoto Scar Scale, Japan Scar Workshop Scale and Vancouver Scar Scale scores. The results of this review indicate keloidectomy followed by radiation therapy provide satisfactory recurrence rates; however, clinical studies evaluating these treatments do not describe treatment outcomes or use different definitions of keloid recurrence. Consequently, recurrence rates vary widely, making comparisons across studies difficult. Keloid recurrence should be clearly defined using both objective and subjective measures.
瘢痕疙瘩是一种纤维增生性疾病,可由网状真皮的皮肤损伤引起。据报道,仅手术切除后的复发率高达100%。因此,人们采用了多种术后技术来预防瘢痕疙瘩复发,包括使用放射治疗。尽管大量研究表明,切除术后的X射线、电子束、激光和近距离放射治疗可降低瘢痕疙瘩的复发率,但存在许多不一致之处,包括瘢痕疙瘩复发的多种定义,这使得比较研究结果变得困难。本综述旨在研究在涉及放射治疗的临床试验中定义瘢痕疙瘩复发的各种方法。检索了Cochrane图书馆和PubMed,以确定放射治疗后手术瘢痕疙瘩复发的可用信息。对每项纳入研究进行了患者随访和瘢痕疙瘩复发定义标准的审查。检索结果包括外照射、近距离放射治疗和浅表放射治疗的临床研究。许多研究没有包括瘢痕疙瘩复发的定义,或者仅将复发定义为瘢痕组织的再次出现。其他研究根据患者自我评估问卷、症状、瘢痕隆起以及京都瘢痕量表、日本瘢痕研讨会量表和温哥华瘢痕量表评分的变化来定义瘢痕疙瘩复发。本综述结果表明,瘢痕疙瘩切除术后进行放射治疗可提供令人满意的复发率;然而,评估这些治疗方法的临床研究没有描述治疗结果,或使用了不同的瘢痕疙瘩复发定义。因此,复发率差异很大,难以在不同研究间进行比较。应使用客观和主观指标明确界定瘢痕疙瘩复发。