Looijaard S M L M, Maier A B, Voskuilen A F, Van Zanten T, Bouman D E, Klaase J M, Meskers C G M
Department of Human Movement Sciences, @AgeAmsterdam, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, VU University, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Medicine and Aged Care, @AgeMelbourne, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, 300 Grattan Street, Parkville, Melbourne, 3050, Victoria, Australia.
Heliyon. 2020 Nov 9;6(11):e05437. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05437. eCollection 2020 Nov.
It is unknown whether computed tomography (CT)-based total abdominal muscle measures are representative of specific abdominal muscle groups and whether analysis of specific abdominal muscle groups are predictive of the risk of adverse outcomes in older cancer patients.
Retrospective single-center cohort study in elective colon cancer patients aged ≥65 years. CT-based skeletal muscle (SM) surface area, muscle density and intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) surface area were determined for rectus abdominis; external- and internal oblique and transversus abdominis (lateral muscles); psoas; and erector spinae and quadratus lumborum (back muscles). Outcomes were defined as severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo score >2) and long-term survival (median follow-up 5.2 years).
254 older colon cancer patients were included (median 73.6 years, 62.2% males). Rectus abdominis showed the lowest SM surface area and muscle density and the back muscles showed the highest IMAT surface area. Psoas muscle density, and lateral muscle density and percentage IMAT were associated with severe postoperative complications independent of gender, age and cancer stage.
CT-based total abdominal muscle quantity and quality do not represent the heterogeneity that exists between specific muscle groups. The potential added value of analysis of specific muscle groups in predicting adverse outcomes in older (colon) cancer patients should be further addressed in prospective studies.
基于计算机断层扫描(CT)的全腹肌肉测量是否能代表特定的腹部肌肉群,以及特定腹部肌肉群的分析是否能预测老年癌症患者出现不良结局的风险,目前尚不清楚。
对年龄≥65岁的择期结肠癌患者进行回顾性单中心队列研究。测定腹直肌、腹外斜肌、腹内斜肌和腹横肌(外侧肌肉)、腰大肌以及竖脊肌和腰方肌(背部肌肉)基于CT的骨骼肌(SM)表面积、肌肉密度和肌间脂肪组织(IMAT)表面积。结局定义为严重术后并发症(Clavien-Dindo评分>2)和长期生存(中位随访5.2年)。
纳入254例老年结肠癌患者(中位年龄73.6岁,62.2%为男性)。腹直肌的SM表面积和肌肉密度最低,背部肌肉的IMAT表面积最高。腰大肌密度、外侧肌肉密度和IMAT百分比与严重术后并发症相关,独立于性别、年龄和癌症分期。
基于CT的全腹肌肉数量和质量并不能代表特定肌肉群之间存在的异质性。特定肌肉群分析在预测老年(结肠)癌患者不良结局方面的潜在附加价值应在前瞻性研究中进一步探讨。